![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||||||||||
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
This is one question I have been thinking about several times in the past. We are told that Sauron did not use the name "Sauron" for himself, for obvious reasons, however still it seems that the name was far more spread than any other names he might have made for himself - and that is, not only among his enemies (where it makes sense), but also among his own soldiers and followers. Let us make a quick recapitulation:
Quote:
Sauron is being referred to by his enemies as Sauron, or "the Enemy", or, more scarcely, "the Dark Lord". Of course Sauron's servants are not calling him "Enemy". The most "affectionate" term for Sauron is probably "the Great Eye", such as in: Quote:
Quote:
So this far, it would all be very nice. For the Free Peoples, Sauron is mostly "Enemy" or "Sauron" for those, who have the Harry Potter syndrome and are not afraid to speak his name aloud, even though, as we heard from Aragorn, he really does not approve of that. Sauron's servants, on the contrary, call him "Great Eye" or simply "Him". But what to make of... Quote:
First question: all right, let us say, if this guy was really Sauron's right-hand man, perhaps he was such a favourite that Sauron did not mind that this guy would use his right name. This would, however, make sense let's say (to stick with the example I have already been using) in the case of Voldemort. But Sauron does not call even himself "Sauron", so why should he allow anybody to call him that? Aside from that, the etymology of the name Sauron (I assume everybody knows, but this is essential of course for this whole post): Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, back to the original topic - definitely calling oneself "Mouth of Sauron" does not make sense. Well, I think we could still attempt to save it by saying that it was a "diplomatic title" - although that is the second problem, I really don't think the solution is perfectly "clean" either. What I mean is, "and he said: 'I am the Mouth of Sauron'" could mean that the Mouth of Sauron used it only on the outside, i.e. while presenting himself (and his master) to the "outworlders". He was a diplomat, after all, and he was definitely using his master's "right" name in the negotiations: Quote:
Quote:
Nevertheless, calling Sauron "Sauron" in diplomatic talks is slightly, well, inappropriate? Don't you think so too? If Gandalf was the one to use it, it would make sense, and then the Mouth of Sauron could shout "Hey, watch your mouth [sic], you grey Beard [sic ![]() It is true that in diplomatic talk with random Easterling or Southron barbaric tribes, who have heard of Sauron only as Sauron, it might be just easy to use the name for the sake of clarity. (An emissary coming with an offer such as: "Hello, I am emissary of... well, you know... and I would like that you join... well, you know... he is really strong, surely you have heard of him..." wouldn't probably rally many nations to his cause.) The policy might be as well: "Join Sauron the Great!" and only later: "Okay, so if you agree, let us sign this pact which consists of three points, 1. you will have our military aid, 2. we will have your military aid, 3. we will give your chieftain a cool ring, 4. you will not use the name 'Sauron' from now on." The usage of "Sauron the Great" in diplomatic talks is supported at least by Glóin's account of the emissary coming to Erebor: Quote:
This raises an interesting question, however. Even if the word "Sauron" was used only in the contact with the "outsiders", what was the Mouth called in the Barad-Dur hierarchy? "The Mouth of the Eye" sounds definitely poetic, but slightly confusing. "His Mouth" sounds almost comical, if there wasn't for this fear of punishment, I could imagine the Orcs secretly calling him "His Mouthness". Perhaps, as I have once seen in Middle-Earth playing cards, calling him "The Mouth" would be a good choice (and it would fit, something like "The Eye". The only thing that remains is to call the sniffing Khamul "The Nose" and we have almost complete face).
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Wight of the Old Forest
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Unattended on the railway station, in the litter at the dancehall
Posts: 3,329
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Then, of course, we have the name Annatar, "Lord of Gifts" (or, according to a later source, Aulendil) which Sauron used as an alias in his dealings with the Gwaith-i-Mirdain (and possibly the Númenoreans as well?). All this makes the use of Sauron's 'right name' by his subordinates all the more puzzling. The need for clarity in diplomatic negotiations sounds like a good explanation to me, but I'd like to hear some other opinions. *Afterthought: After the fall of Númenor, Sauron Quote:
__________________
Und aus dem Erebos kamen viele seelen herauf der abgeschiedenen toten.- Homer, Odyssey, Canto XI |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,038
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nice thread, Legate. This is something I've wondered about from time to time.
As you note, Sauron was his name among all those in the West of Middle-earth. He would have had different names in the tongues of the Easterlings and Haradrim, and probably also in the Black Speech, but Sauron he was to all his enemies in the Third Age. In the Elder Days, all the Valar and Maia known to the Elves of Valinor were given names. Sauron would have been a result of his association with Morgoth. Quote:
So he'd had the moniker Sauron almost from the first. If he had been given any other name by the Eldar before that, it would only have been used a relatively brief time, before his service to Melkor became known. His 'original' name would possibly have made a reference to Sauron's beauty, or perhaps his service to Aulë (and I'm admittedly just guessing here). But would a name making reference to his being good have been appealing to him in the Third Age, when he was well aware he could no longer fool the West by appearing to be beautiful and good? On the contrary: he reveled in evil, relished the thought of crushing the West. Therefore, I think being called the abhorred was something that could have given him some perverse pleasure. As to the Mouth's name in Sauron's forces, I think it might actually have been 'Mouth', or 'the Speaker', or something like that. After all, his original identity had been swallowed up, so what else would they have called him?
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
And Dakêsîntrah, thanks for posting the list too - good to have it here (although of course it does not say anything to the question as it is, that is, how was the name "Sauron" used and why especially in relation to people such as the Mouth).
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,038
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
EDIT- had this thought also. Sauron was known only by that name to the West. Quote:
How would he have 'declared himself'? 'It is I, the one who you thought you beat in the Second Age. You took my Ring, but I'm back anyway. I will break you!' (couldn't resist the Rocky IV reference ![]() No. He would have named himself, by the moniker the west knew. 'I am Sauron. I will destroy you'. I do think it likely he didn't want his own servants to use that name under normal circumstances. He was not only their ruler, but aspired to be their god as well. The generic names used by the Orcs, Him, the Top, etc., would have been adequate for them, and would have helped keep Sauron as a totem in their eyes, a figure they would only need to see as their Master. But when dealing directly with those in the West, Sauron would suffice. Again, why not? The abhorred wasn't really all that demeaning, and it still seems likely Sauron would be amused by it, and probably proud of it.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. Last edited by Inziladun; 01-31-2010 at 12:31 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Animated Skeleton
|
Names of Sauron:
~ Annatar (Quenya "Lord of Gifts" -Sil, -UT) Name given to himself Second Age ~ Artano ("High Smith" -UT) Name given to himself Second Age -UT ~ Aulendil ("Servant of Aule" -UT) Name given to himself Second Age -UT ~ Dark Power (-LotR) ~ Enemy (-LotR) ~ Gorthaur the Cruel (Sindarin gor "horror, dread", thaur "abominable, abhorrent" -Sil) ~ Lord of the Rings (-LotR) ~ Necromancer (-LotR, -BoLT2) ~ Sauron (Quenya for "abominable"; "the abhorred"-Sil) ~ Sorceror of Dol Guldur ~ Tevildo Prince of Cats (early cat form that fought Huan -BoLT1) ~ Thauron (early Quenya) ~ Thu the Hunter (early Sindarin) ~ Thu the Necromancer (-BoLT2) ~ Tiberth (Noldorin/Gnomish name for Tevildo, replacing Tifil -BoLT2) ~ Tifil (BoLT2) References: LotR, Sil, UT, BoLT 1 & 2 http://www.valarguild.org/varda/Tolk...auronNames.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
![]() |
Quote:
The easiest explanation is that Aragorn is wrong. He is the only character who makes this claim about Sauron's name. Certainly Gimli assumed that Sauron permitted the use of his name, so it definitely isn't exactly "common knowledge" that the use of Sauron's name is forbidden. Note that the messenger of Sauron who visits Dain also refers to his master as "Sauron". Three things occur to me: 1. Perhaps the use of "Sauron" was only forbidden when he was residing in Dol Guldur. His true identity was not known at that time, although it was suspected by the White Council. Instead he was referred to as the Necromancer. Aragorn was alive at this time (although much younger) so perhaps he thinks (erroneously) that Sauron still forbids the use of the name. Sauron required secrecy when he was based in Dol Guldur - after he returned to Mordor there was no longer a requirement for secrecy. 2. When communicating with people of the West it certainly makes sense for Sauron's emissaries to use the name by which he is commonly known in the West. 3. Many people in the West are reluctant to actually speak Sauron's name out loud, so for a feared servant of Sauron to use the dreaded name could well just be a psychological ploy. As for Sauron's feelings about the meaning of the name, "The Abhorred", why would he be concerned? Surely he relishes the fact that he is regarded the most hated and feared individual in Middle Earth! Another possibility is that Aragorn was partially correct. Perhaps regular Orcs are forbidden from mentioning the name of their Master. Certainly none of them do. However, the prohibition may not extend to Sauron's most trusted servants - some of whom are Men. If there is some special exception to the Rule then surely this would not be well-known, even to someone like Aragorn. I'm sure Aragorn isn't familiar with every Rule and By-law of Barad-dur! Alternatively, Tolkien may have simply made a mistake. Aragorn's remark may be a leftover from an earlier draft that was left in due to an oversight. In fact, looking at what appears to be the original draft in HOME VII, The Treason of Isengard I see this: 'S is for Sauron,' said Gimli. 'That is easy to read.' 'Nay,' said Legolas. 'Sauron does not use the Runes.' 'Neither does he use his right name or permit it to be spelt or spoken,' said Trotter. 'And he does not use white. The orcs of his immediate service bear the sign of the single eye.' He stood for a moment in thought. 'S is for Saruman, I guess,' he said at last. (from XIX The Departure of Boromir) So that is almost identical to the final version. Presumably the idea of the Mouth of Sauron came much later in the writing process. Still, I wonder about the earlier emissary of Sauron who went to Erebor? What did he say in the earlier drafts (if he was there at all)? Back to HOME again... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |