The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2004, 05:18 PM   #1
Lumiel
Registered User
 
Lumiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Land of Mordor (MWUAHAHAHA!...ahem...)
Posts: 95
Lumiel has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien Originality in fantasy Post-Tolkien

Alright. Is it just me, or do most fantasy/sci-fi (emphasis on the fantasy though) books seem to copy Tolkien in some form or another? Mind you, I love the basic idea....the unassuming underdog undergoes (hee hee! alliteration! ) Herculean trials and emerges stronger than any thought possible and Voila! the day is saved! It's simply classic and I love to rehash things that I already like.

I remember that one of the first books I read after finishing the trilogy for the first time was Terry Brooks' The Sword of Shannara. It was a wonderful book, and his style reminds me somewhat of Tolkien, only less cryptic if you know what I mean. But from the very first chapter, it's impossible to escape the fact that the plot is almost identical to LOTR. Brooks is imaginative in creating his own world, which although similar, is still different in key ways, such as his portrayal of elves, dwarves, humans, and the like. His later books in the series branch off into different (although all with an underlying theme that is nearly the same) storylines and plots and his other series, such as A Knight of the Word are completely different from his Shannara series and in another world altogether from Tolkien's work.

I was just wondering what other people think about this; do books nowadays seem only to remake what's already been done by Tolkien? Or are they just doing what's been done for thousands of years? And also, what books have you read that are similar to Tolkien's work and what are entirely new or groundbreaking as far as the fantasy genre goes?
Lumiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2004, 07:22 PM   #2
One of the Nine
Haunting Spirit
 
One of the Nine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In my mind. What? Why are you looking at me like that?
Posts: 84
One of the Nine has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to One of the Nine Send a message via MSN to One of the Nine
Tolkien

I havn't personally read "The Sword of Shannara," but my brother is and he says that it is very much like "The Lord of the Rings." The only thing that is different is that Shannara has more books than LotR.
I can't think of any series that I have read with almost the exact plot line as LotR, but one thing I have noticed is that a lot of people like to knock LotR and some have even gone to the length of writing books that make fun of LotR. Not to stray from the original subject too much, but my dad owns a copy of "Bored of the Rings." I have half a mind to read it, but I'm still thinking...
__________________
I have a very short attention span, and it sometimes affects me when I'm, ooo a squirrel....
One of the Nine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2004, 11:55 PM   #3
Imladris
Tears of the Phoenix
 
Imladris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Putting dimes in the jukebox baby.
Posts: 1,494
Imladris has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien

I don't know if this topic has done but I'm going to answer just because this particular issue is a sore spot with me.

Quote:
Alright. Is it just me, or do most fantasy/sci-fi (emphasis on the fantasy though) books seem to copy Tolkien in some form or another?
I think that we are forgetting that Tolkien himself copied most shamelessly. He built most of his own mythology upon already existing Norse mythology (such as Beowulf). The whole scene with Bilbo stealing the cup is based on a scene in Beowulf. Even his languages were built on already existing languages.

Quote:
I was just wondering what other people think about this; do books nowadays seem only to remake what's already been done by Tolkien? Or are they just doing what's been done for thousands of years? And also, what books have you read that are similar to Tolkien's work and what are entirely new or groundbreaking as far as the fantasy genre goes?
There are only a few storylines in this world that we could number them on one hand. What makes a story, however, is the way you tell that story. That's what Tolkien did. He told a common story line and he made it unique.

Sometimes, when I read these sort of threads (nothing against you Lumiel), it seems as if people view Tolkien as the king of all fantasy -- and that's simply not true. It's illogical to say that Tolkien is the accumulation of the fantasy genre and that anything written is a mere rehash and rip off. That would be denying the uniqueness and creativity of human nature.

Of course Tolkien was a major turning stone in the fantasy genre. So was Shakespeare. Shakespeare coined many words -- is it wrong to use them? Tolkien helped build the fantasy genre. He gave a new and better definition to elves. Why not use it? That would be like ignoring mechanical advances because they were built on someone else's shoulders.

Yes, there are some shameful copies. But there are only a few. The Chronicles of Prydain by Lloyd Alexander, The Chronicles of Narnia, George MacDonald (was he before or after Tolkien?) and many others are not rip offs -- yet they are fantasy.
__________________
I'm sorry it wasn't a unicorn. It would have been nice to have unicorns.

Imladris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 08:00 AM   #4
starkat
Wight
 
starkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cair Paravel during the Golden Age of Narnia
Posts: 146
starkat has just left Hobbiton.
I really disagree with you about the Chronicles of Narnia being a copy of Tolkien's work. Lewis and Tolkien for one were contemporaries. Not to mention that one is geared for an older audience while the other is geared for children. Why do you think the CoN are copies of Tolkien's work?
starkat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 09:19 AM   #5
Imladris
Tears of the Phoenix
 
Imladris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Putting dimes in the jukebox baby.
Posts: 1,494
Imladris has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien

You misread me:

Quote:
The Chronicles of Prydain by Lloyd Alexander, The Chronicles of Narnia, George MacDonald (was he before or after Tolkien?) and many others are not rip offs -- yet they are fantasy.
I said they were not ripoffs.

Cheers,
Imladris
__________________
I'm sorry it wasn't a unicorn. It would have been nice to have unicorns.

Imladris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 11:44 AM   #6
starkat
Wight
 
starkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cair Paravel during the Golden Age of Narnia
Posts: 146
starkat has just left Hobbiton.
I'm sorry. I'll pay closer attention in the future. Thanks for correcting me.
starkat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 02:54 PM   #7
Eruwen
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 901
Eruwen has just left Hobbiton.
Tolkien

I agree with Imladris on this topic, Lumiel, but I would like to elaborate a little on it.

It amazes me sometimes how much is in Tolkien's writings of Middle Earth. Whenever I sit down to read or write, even when it comes to reading the Bible, I find things that resemble Tolkien. I see character and place names that seem familiar and countless events that are parallel to those of Tolkien. I don't think it's necessarily the fact that writers want to copy Tolkien, it's just the fact that it's hard to write anything that doesn't resemble it in some way.

Tolkien's stories have so many plot lines within plot lines and so many events that happen, that it's hard to find an event that Tolkien did not write about. I have found that the Lord of the Rings itself is packed with just about every type of incident and character type possible. Take the movie "A Beautiful Mind", for instance. You could take Russell Crowe's character and say that the writers were copying Gollum by making the character Skitzo. That's one of the less defining examples there, but it's all I could come up with at the time.

My point is that yes, some writers for some reason are cynical and feel a need to copy and criticize Tolkien, but most do not. Many are just stuck in a rut, whether they know it or not, of not being able to write a story that does not veer towards Tolkien. Tolkien was a very good and broad writer. Sadly, he has made it hard on all of rising writers to be creative in our works. That's just how it is.
Eruwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 03:18 PM   #8
Gothmog
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Gothmog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home
Posts: 443
Gothmog has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via MSN to Gothmog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eruwen
It amazes me sometimes how much is in Tolkien's writings of Middle Earth. Whenever I sit down to read or write, even when it comes to reading the Bible, I find things that resemble Tolkien.
I doubt that the Bible is inspired by Tolkien

It's true that many of the fantasy stories written after LotR are similiar, but I thinks it's unevitable that authors get inspired by Tolkiens world. They're not copying (well, there are those who do) and I think they deserve full respect for they're work, which is unique for them. OK, they borrow some stuff from the master himself, mr JRRT, but almost every book ever written is similiar to something else.

To say that all fantasy-writers are copying Tolkien is like saying that every story copies from the great ancient play-writers that made masterpieces like The Oddysée (is it spelled like that in Eng. ?) or Oidiphus etc etc...

Just my opinion
__________________
Three switched witches watch three Swatch watch switches.
Which switched witch watch which Swatch watch switch?

He who breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom
~Lurker...
Gothmog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 09:26 PM   #9
Lush
Fair and Cold
 
Lush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the big onion
Posts: 1,803
Lush is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Send a message via ICQ to Lush Send a message via AIM to Lush Send a message via Yahoo to Lush
To elaborate on something Imladris already mentioned: there is nothing new under the sun. The challenge that writers face, in whatever they write, is in taking something familiar and making it their own, and making it readable, clever, fun, deep, you name it.

For example, you can take "The Wasteland" and chew out Eliot for just clumping together a bunch of references to other writers and peppering the whole thing with a little Modernist gloom and doom. That would be missing the point. Of course Eliot was playing off his predecessors, but "The Wasteland" is deeper than that, because it makes you think of things in a new way; it touches you in a new way; it it rattles and excites and horrifies you in a new way.

The somebody like Adrienne Rich comes along and is clearly influenced by "The Wasteland" and Eliot's other works, but, through the strength of her talent, has something new to add.

This, I believe, is evident in pre- and post-Tolkien movements in literature, with many different evolving themes intersecting. The results are usually worthless (at least, in my not so humble opinion), but that has more to do with the fact that most literature is worthless in general.

Yet there is always that smattering of books that are worth your time; these are the books that, according to Vladimir Nabokov's rule of thumb regarding "great" literature, cannot be read, they can only be re-read. As the Danielle Steeles of the world get richer, there are still writers out there who produce awesome, important stuff that our grandkids will hopefully be reading (unless, um, we destroy the world 'till then, but I try to be optimistic).

And I would gladly place J.K. Rowling into that pile of authors that saw some things in Tolkien they could play off of and did it wiith style, grace, and a good sense of humour no less.
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~

Last edited by Lush; 04-25-2004 at 09:37 PM.
Lush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2004, 09:38 PM   #10
Lobelia
Wight
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 150
Lobelia has just left Hobbiton.
Okay, guys, here's a suggestion: read Diana Wynne Jones' TOUGH GUIDE TO FANTASYLAND. Very funny, and it has a great dig at all the cliches in fantasy. Stew. Inns. The red-haired big-breasted villainess. And so on.

What's really a shame is that people often accuse Tolkien of cliches when he did some things that are now standard in fantasy before they became cliches. If Sword of Shanarra looks familiar, it's because the publishers commissioned Terry Brooks to write a Tolkien-style book. It was a cash-in. I remember buying the book when it first came out and throwing it across the room in fury. I couldn't finish it. I'm a minority, of course; he's been wildly successful for 20 years.

Oh, and read Bored of the Rings - it's great fun and quite affectionate. It's a classic.

Yes, there is indeed a common source for *good* fantasy, but, guys, there are also a lot of rip-offs out there and nothing is more likely to put me off than reading a rave on a book cover comparing it with Tolkien. I love fantasy, but I like it individual. Barbara Hambly. Jennifer Fallon. George R.R.Martin. Guy Gavriel Kay. Diana Wynne Jones - the list goes on. None of them has to imitate. If you have read a lot, you should be able to discern the difference between common sources and rip-off. Good characters you can care about - that's what makes the difference. Tolkien knew that, but so does any good fantasy writer.
Lobelia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 01:26 AM   #11
HerenIstarion
Deadnight Chanter
 
HerenIstarion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,301
HerenIstarion is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Send a message via ICQ to HerenIstarion
being in general agreement with the "no new story under the sun" line, I nevertheless, would refute:

Quote:
it seems as if people view Tolkien as the king of all fantasy -- and that's simply not true
With quite an opposite maxim (but for one word in it) as "Tolkien is the king of all modern fantasy". He gave the whole genre enormous push, pulling it out of oblivion or, rather, creating it and shaping it as a branch of modern literature. Prior to that, fantasy was the field of scholars, on one extreme (with Golden Bough and what not) and field of nurses and mentors of young children on another extreme, considered either very serious reasearch material or not serius read at all for people above ten. Abundant flow of yearly books (with boasty maxims of "as good as JRRT at his height" on the back of their covers) gives some nourishment for musing oupon him being the said royal person of fantasy...
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal

- Would you believe in the love at first sight?
- Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time!
HerenIstarion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 05:17 AM   #12
Keeper of Dol Guldur
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Keeper of Dol Guldur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 315, CNY Boys and girls.
Posts: 405
Keeper of Dol Guldur has just left Hobbiton.
Agree, but disagree

I think inclusion of dwarves, elves, wizards and goblins are what make fantasy fantasy, and therefore can't count as ripoffs, because without them it wouldn't be fantasy anyway . . . I do see a lot of characters and themes based on them repeated.

For starters, dwarves are always depicted as greedy, grumpy, gruff little guys.

The very idea of dwarves is short, bearded, tool wielding men who mine underground . . .

The very idea of elves are forest dwellers with pointy ears, although graceful, spirtual and godly creatures are pretty LOTR driven . . .

The epic quest theme is what I think is repeated too often. There's almost always a symbolic heirloom, a dark tyrant and a journey that lasts forever.

What somebody needs to do, is set other genres in a fantasy setting, like a psychological thriller about a dragon-slayer, or a vigilante story about a band of werewolves . . . or the troubles of a some sociopaths who just happen to be vampire hunters . . . or even make a fantasy into a drastic allegorical satire of society (which Tolkien adamantly was not doing, but somebody really should go for it, with that in mind).
__________________
"I come from yonder...Have you seen Baggins? Baggins has left, he is coming. He is not far away. I wish to find him. If he passes will you tell me? I will come back with gold." - Khamul the Easterling
Keeper of Dol Guldur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 05:39 AM   #13
HerenIstarion
Deadnight Chanter
 
HerenIstarion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,301
HerenIstarion is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Send a message via ICQ to HerenIstarion
To Keeper:

But the very ideas you depict as necessary for fantasy, are very indo-european, or even narrower, European ideas (or archetypes, as some prefer to put it )

But for Tolkien (and overflowing stream of his followers), they would presumably remain European folk lore. Now, what we have throughout the world, they are becoming universal ideas. And universal as Tolkien gave them - elves tall, star-eyed noble people, and fair number of other cliches too. If you look through the list of our members, you'll find that a lot of them is from Malaysia, Indonesia or elsewhere which do not have the background you seem to look at so obvious adn natural. Not to go very far, I for myself may be quite a good exapmle. Georgian mythos in no way has bearded dwarves or star-eyed elves, yet I'm affected to the extent that concept of bearded short guy under the mountain is my own already. I recognize archetypes which would have been blank for my grandfather thanks to Tolkien, and him mostly.

(BTW, That is why it is so hard to translate Tolkien into non European languages, for Germans, Dutch and Norwegians take some conventions for granted which would look just very strange for Japanese (assuming he/she never heard of Tolkien, or read it in his adulthood with no previous hint as of European mythos)

And even with his enormous popularity, Tolkien is often giving way to newly born American urban mythos, which is, may I say so, mightily exported from USA along with the general culture export taking place this last fifty years (ah, Hollywood) - with lot of 'man' suffixed epic heroes (i.e Spiderman, Superman etc)

But for Tolkien (not position arguable, but merely strong feeling on my part nevertheless), those would become universal ideas instead, and for all their value, for me it would be a sad thing
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal

- Would you believe in the love at first sight?
- Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time!

Last edited by HerenIstarion; 04-26-2004 at 05:55 AM.
HerenIstarion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 07:07 AM   #14
Bêthberry
Cryptic Aura
 
Bêthberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,159
Bêthberry is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.Bêthberry is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.Bêthberry is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.Bêthberry is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.
Boots

Good point, I think, HI, to point out that Tolkien worked specifically within European traditions of myth to create his fantasy. This makes me wonder what forms of fantasy, if any, exist in other cultures that might not have been influenced (at least until recently) by Tolkien. Can it be said that the genre of fantasy exists in, say, Chinese, Japanese and Indian literatures?

There is also another way to think about this comment from Keeper, which perhaps reflects much of the thought here that the 'content' or type of characters is what marks fantasy:

Quote:
I think inclusion of dwarves, elves, wizards and goblins are what make fantasy fantasy, and therefore can't count as ripoffs, because without them it wouldn't be fantasy anyway . . . I do see a lot of characters and themes based on them repeated.
In this regard, Tolkien's essay "On Fairy-Stories" is very interesting, for Tokien specifically says that fantasy is not based on content, on the simple inclusion of elves or beasts. Part of his arguement is as follows:

Quote:
The definition of a fairy-story--what it is, or what it should be--does not, then, depend on any definition or historical account of elf or fairy, but upon the nature of Faërie: the Perilous Realm itself, and the air that blows in that country.... The magic of Faërie is not an end in itself, its virtue is in its operations: among these are the satisfaction of certain primordial human desires. One of these desires is to survey the depths of space and time. Another is (as will be seen) to hold communion with other living things. A story may thus deal with the satisfaction of these desires, with or without the operation of either machine or magic, and in proportion as it succeeds it will approach the quality and have the flavour of fairy-story.
Perhaps one way of thinking about how other writers use fantasy is to consider what they add to this idea, or whether they ignore it.
__________________
I’ll sing his roots off. I’ll sing a wind up and blow leaf and branch away.
Bêthberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 08:39 AM   #15
Olorin_TLA
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gardens of Lórien, Valinor.
Posts: 420
Olorin_TLA has just left Hobbiton.
This tradition doesn't realy exist in Europe outside of Spain, but in Spain and Latin America the genre of magic-realism has been their "fantasy" for aaages. So fantasy, as you quoted, doesn't need Elves etc to be fantasy...it just needs to have a spark of the extra-ordinary (aka, fantastci).
__________________
"For I am Olórin! And Olórin means me!"

ELENDIL! - Join "Forth Tolkiengas!"
Olorin_TLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 05:45 PM   #16
Saraphim
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Saraphim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The other side of freezing.
Posts: 410
Saraphim has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Saraphim
The Eye

I am an aspiring writer, and have been for years, and I just recently had an original idea that does not copy Tolkien. But even looking at my notes now, I can see how Tolkien has influenced me on a subconcious level.

It has been a struggle to stay away from the Lord of the Rings fantasy world, and I can see how many authors can slip, or even cash in on the popularity of that sort of setting.

That happened recently with a book I shall not name for fear of being flamed. But it has more direct relations to Tolkien's respective works than I have ever see. I get so angry with that peice of work.
__________________
I drink Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters!
~
Always remember: pillage BEFORE you burn.
Saraphim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 05:45 PM   #17
Lhundulinwen
Wight
 
Lhundulinwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wishin' and hopin' in the Shire
Posts: 139
Lhundulinwen has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Lhundulinwen Send a message via MSN to Lhundulinwen Send a message via Yahoo to Lhundulinwen
White Tree

I am a writer, and I began writing long before I read LOTR, but after reading it, I found that many of my short stories had Tolkien-ish elements when I revisited them. I hadn't read that much fantasy (especially fantasy written after Tolkien), but I had read classical stories such as The Odyssey and bits of Beowulf. Tolkien did borrow shamelessly, but he mixed these elements together in such a way that it made something so unique and different it is a classic work in its self.

I had to take a seriously long break in my novel after reading LOTR because I would unconsciously put an Aragorn or Gimli character into it. When a writer sits down to write, everything they've ever experienced, felt, read, or been around is game to be but down on paper (or screen). To consciously block anything out takes a lot of effort.

Yes, a lot of writers purposefully copy Tolkien. Brooks's Sword of Shannara is a good book, but it is really really close to being the same as LOTR. (If you love LOTR, please don't read the book; you may end up having a screaming arguement at the book!!!) Yes, there really aren't that many different plots, or for that matter, types of characters.

Most writers who have any self respect try their best to be original. But a lot of them, whether they know it or not, borrow from the same classical works as Tolkien did; or they may copy directly from Tolkien because LOTR is their favorite book, they just haven't read it in years or just forgot all the juicy details we all love.

Whether fantasy or not, all writer's try to be original and different; but with such a great epic work as Tolkien, in the last fifty years it has been hard to be original compared to the Master of Fantasy.
__________________
~*Just call on me, and I'm there. I'll always be your Sam*~
Lhundulinwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 06:05 PM   #18
Lush
Fair and Cold
 
Lush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the big onion
Posts: 1,803
Lush is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Send a message via ICQ to Lush Send a message via AIM to Lush Send a message via Yahoo to Lush
Keeper, your definition of fantasy is narrower than Paris Hilton's waist (for all of you living under a rock, that's pretty durn narrow).

Oh, and as much as I believe in the whole "nothing new under the sun" notion, there is still a lot of fantasy out there that a) Wasn't one of the sources Tolkien drew on for his stuff and/or b) Wasn't revolutionized by the advent of Tolkien.

Try Russian folklore, an area that was virtually inaccessible to Western scholars even as the world began to grow small in the past century (thank you, Uncle Stalin). Check out, for example, the myth of the wise grey wolf and compare it to Tolkien's vicious wargs.

See, the basic building blocks are usually the same, but stories are interpreted and re-interpreted over time. And that's interesting.
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~
Lush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 08:24 PM   #19
Mad Baggins
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Mad Baggins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A place where after thunder golden showers come falling like a rain of flowers.
Posts: 374
Mad Baggins has just left Hobbiton.
Have any of you read the Xanth series by Piers Anthony? They are a quite good (in my mind) series of fantasy novels. They are in no way similar to Tolkien, and I find that quite refreshing after having seen novels like Eragon in which there are so many Middle-earth related names it's insane. Another good set of fantasies are the MYTH series; I can't remember the author at the moment. They too are completely original in their ideas. So in my opinion, there are still a lot of authors that are finding new sources for their fantasy novels, just like there are a lot of authors finding sources for their fantasies in Tolkien's works.
__________________
I like buying snacks from a vending machine because food is better when it falls. Sometimes at the grocery, I'll drop a candy bar so that it will achieve its maximum flavor potential.
Mad Baggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 09:01 PM   #20
Lobelia
Wight
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 150
Lobelia has just left Hobbiton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keeper of Dol Goldur

What somebody needs to do, is set other genres in a fantasy setting, like a psychological thriller about a dragon-slayer, or a vigilante story about a band of werewolves . . . or the troubles of a some sociopaths who just happen to be vampire hunters . . . or even make a fantasy into a drastic allegorical satire of society (which Tolkien adamantly was not doing, but somebody really should go for it, with that in mind).
Great idea, Keeper! Do it!

You'd probably like Parke Godwin - his novel about Beowulf has great psychological depth regarding Beowulf's relationship with his father, and presents a sympathetic Grendel. I can't name any books of the kind you suggest above, though I'm pretty sure someone has done all of them at some stage. But they're not that common.
Lobelia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 11:36 PM   #21
HerenIstarion
Deadnight Chanter
 
HerenIstarion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,301
HerenIstarion is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Send a message via ICQ to HerenIstarion
Quote:
That happened recently with a book I shall not name for fear of being flamed. But it has more direct relations to Tolkien's respective works than I have ever see. I get so angry with that peice of work.
Please tell us, for I at least am very curious. We could make a lovely discussion around it, without flaming, I believe (or is it that you are the author? Than, if you feel it is too private an affair, I withdraw my bidding)


Quote:
MYTH series; I can't remember the author at the moment.
Robert Asprin. Quite good, indeed
__________________
Egroeg Ihkhsal

- Would you believe in the love at first sight?
- Yes I'm certain that it happens all the time!

Last edited by HerenIstarion; 04-26-2004 at 11:53 PM.
HerenIstarion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 04:44 AM   #22
Olorin_TLA
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gardens of Lórien, Valinor.
Posts: 420
Olorin_TLA has just left Hobbiton.
I know what you mean, Saraphim, I'm an aspiring author too, and it's hard to get away from Tolkien, even if it's just coincidental similarities! (For instance, wanting to avoid using the name High Elves (my Elves are getting too different now in many ways from "fantasy" Elves that it's odd for me to use the term tho) I went for Golden Elves, because I was stuck for a better term. Any way, at one point a whole bunch of refugees move into a wood, cohabiting with the people there to form the Golden Wood. I realised I'd just named a wood the Golden Wood, and gave up trying to escape fro Tolkein's shadow. ;)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keeper of Dol Goldur
What somebody needs to do, is set other genres in a fantasy setting, like a psychological thriller about a dragon-slayer, or a vigilante story about a band of werewolves . . . or the troubles of a some sociopaths who just happen to be vampire hunters . . . or even make a fantasy into a drastic allegorical satire of society (which Tolkien adamantly was not doing, but somebody really should go for it, with that in mind).
Well Pratchett's got the last point covered, and covered well. :)

But why should they set out to be a "thriller" or any other genre, in a fantasy setting? If a fantasy story has vigilantes in them, or psychological thriller-like areas, (and they do) it's because that's how the plot and characters develop, not because the author said, "I'm going to take a stock-plot and just change the setting" - which generally is as bad as an imitation of LotR, because they're just imitating 2 things now. ;)

About the Dark Lord effect...yes, it is an extremely easy thing to imitate. And yet, was Tolkien the first to use it? I's just that it deosn't seem like the kind of thing that could have not been aroudn forever, yeet I can't think of any thing close, unless you take the archeenemy of a novel, scuh as Moriarty, as being a mslal version of a Dark Lord figure. Hoom hom.
__________________
"For I am Olórin! And Olórin means me!"

ELENDIL! - Join "Forth Tolkiengas!"
Olorin_TLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 01:01 AM   #23
Keeper of Dol Guldur
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Keeper of Dol Guldur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 315, CNY Boys and girls.
Posts: 405
Keeper of Dol Guldur has just left Hobbiton.
Repeat

Quote:
Keeper, your definition of fantasy is narrower than Paris Hilton's waist (for all of you living under a rock, that's pretty durn narrow).
I'll admit, that it was a pretty narrow definition. I realise there's a lot more to fantasy. The reflection of yourself in varying extremes expressed and showcased in their sort of incarnate races seems to be a part (take dwarves, as an example of the greediness and selfishness people are capable of, although not as the absolute example of it, just an extreme form. The same can be true of orcs and their representation of hatred, etc...). Also, fantasy does seem to be in the mindset of discovering the ability in yourself to overcome something, whether mental or physical. And there's a lot more to it, clearly. While Tolkien didn't want to use it in any allegorical sense, fantasy can be used in that way very, very effectively (although the same can be said for more than just fantasy, naturally).

Anyway, it just seemed to me that (which ties in to another reply) it's the mythic races and creatures that are repeated over and again, but a lot of people have a lot of different things to express with those characters. (and when Tolkien's ideas and themes are re-used, that's when it's wicked, wicked noticeable).

Quote:
Great idea, Keeper! Do it!
Already did, I wrote a 12 page (which is still unfinished) short story called "Beneath Every Cover" that got be some credit in high-school anyway, and got me into a writer's convention. That's nothing huge, but it goes with my suggestion; all the fantasy I write is to point out society's problems on a small scale. The entire setting of BEC was in a Prancing Pony-esque tavern (there were huge differences ... it was in the seedy side of a port town, and the whole of the patrons were crooked captains of the guard and thieves. My only elf was a bigot).

Anyway, it was a breath of fresh air for me to write it, and I plan on doing more.

Anyway, I have read some good fantasy that really put different spins on our tried and true elements and alluded to different themes. Weis and Hickman's "Death Gate Cycle" was good, it was about a warmonger named Haplo who thought he was a demigod coming to grips with the fact he was no better than a mere human or dwarf, or his mortal enemy and equally powerful rival, for those who haven't read it. I recommend it, since the world is split into different worlds in it, and each place he visits has completely different interpretations of elves, humans, dwarves and dragons ...

And who is the real enemy is the biggest surprise ...

That's my recommendation for those of you who want less cliched fantasy, because I think that's where the problem lies - the cliches.
__________________
"I come from yonder...Have you seen Baggins? Baggins has left, he is coming. He is not far away. I wish to find him. If he passes will you tell me? I will come back with gold." - Khamul the Easterling
Keeper of Dol Guldur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2004, 08:56 PM   #24
Lhundulinwen
Wight
 
Lhundulinwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wishin' and hopin' in the Shire
Posts: 139
Lhundulinwen has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Lhundulinwen Send a message via MSN to Lhundulinwen Send a message via Yahoo to Lhundulinwen
Silmaril

I agree with Keeper on that one- to make good fiction of any kind, take one characteristic and emulate it. And showing one of societies many problems is a great way to incorpoate a theme. Is "Death Gate Cycle" a novel? It sounds interesting.

Oh, and one more thing. This is just my pet peeve, and one of those things I get really close to being a motivational speaker about, so just bear with me on this one-
Just because you aren't published or have published very little, you ARE a writer, not an aspiring writer as long as you have written something just because you wanted to lately. (not counting high school english assignments- or college!)
__________________
~*Just call on me, and I'm there. I'll always be your Sam*~
Lhundulinwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2004, 10:45 PM   #25
Osse
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Osse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Encircling Sea, deciding which ship to ruin next...could be yours.
Posts: 274
Osse has just left Hobbiton.
I'd just have to say: yes, for many years it has frustrated me that i have found few fantasy writings that are not in some way... let's just say, to be pollitically correct, INSPIRED (cough cough) by Tolkien's works or ideas. Characters, plot schemes, races, etc. all seem to have been 'adapted'.


This is not to say that everyone steals ideas ... there are some fantastic fantasy works out there that are very disssimilar to the works of Tolkien... they are rare and hard to find. Those cheapy fantasy paperbacks for example are often just straight copies, yet many authors (MaCathery, Lustbader, Pratchett, etc etc) can still come up with vibrant original works.

It's sad, but hey! Tolkien's ideas are all so awesome, it's hard not to write with some of them, it's kind of what we expect fantasy to be nowadays.
__________________
'A thinking tyrant, it seemed to Vetinari, had a much harder job than a ruler raised to power by some idiot system like democracy. At least HE could tell the people he was THEIR fault.'
Osse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 08:31 PM   #26
Kitanna
Child of the West
 
Kitanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Watching President Fillmore ride a unicorn
Posts: 2,390
Kitanna is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.Kitanna is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.
Shield

Ok it's clear Tolkien didn't invent the fantasy genre. I mean that's been around since the days of ancient Greece. I think Tolkien just took it to a new level. Just reading some fanatasy books out there now you can tell that the author had to have read Tolkien or that's just an amazing coinidence. Not all fantasy authors do it, but many do it's hard to write a fantasy and not have someone compare it to LOTR. I don't think fantasy authors are "ripping off" Tolkien's work, but there are similarties. Hey, but that's just my opinion.
__________________
"Let us live so that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." - Mark Twain
Kitanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 02:27 PM   #27
Mahal
Haunting Spirit
 
Mahal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Paradox Realm
Posts: 66
Mahal has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via MSN to Mahal
Some authors, are ofcourse blantantly ripping off. There are always, people who do that for money. Some are trying to create, new worlds, and have things in common, and get blasted, for being the same. Well, I also like the Exalted fiction(Exalted being an Pen and paper Rpg), and it is also quite different from Tolkien. It has exotic things, from Asia, Egypt, Europe, and other cultures, and its a very good read, I recommend it.
__________________
A new technology does not add or substract something. It changes everything.
Mahal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 06:38 PM   #28
Lhundulinwen
Wight
 
Lhundulinwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wishin' and hopin' in the Shire
Posts: 139
Lhundulinwen has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to Lhundulinwen Send a message via MSN to Lhundulinwen Send a message via Yahoo to Lhundulinwen
Silmaril

I agree Mahal, exotic mythology (not Greek, Norse, Roman, etc.) makes a story so much more fresh. Obsidian Butterfly of the Anita blake series is a lot better than most of the other books in the series because it uses Southwestern myths and Inca traditions in the climax.
Does anyone have a favorite book or collection of these types of myths? I was looking for Australian and Asian (esp. Polynesian) myths and legends at the library, and they only had the familar myths. Any suggestions?
__________________
~*Just call on me, and I'm there. I'll always be your Sam*~
Lhundulinwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2004, 07:56 PM   #29
Lobelia
Wight
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 150
Lobelia has just left Hobbiton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhundulinwen
Just because you aren't published or have published very little, you ARE a writer, not an aspiring writer as long as you have written something just because you wanted to lately. (not counting high school english assignments- or college!)
Well said! If you write, you're a writer. And make sure you submit because, as someone once said, even rejection slips prove you're a writer. Only writers get them. And don't worry you may be "ripping off" Tolkien. For one thing, every new writer is inspired by *someone*. You develop your own style as you go. For another, let's face it, Tolkien created many things have become standard, even cliched in fantasy fiction, so how can you help it? Mind you, I still recommend Diana Wynne Jones' TOUGH GUIDE TO FANTASYLAND, which has fun with those cliches and can help you avoid being (negatively) compared with JRR.
Lobelia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004, 07:26 AM   #30
Essex
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Essex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 887
Essex has just left Hobbiton.
OK, one writer who I don't think has taken too much from Tolkien's world but has created (in my opinion) the second best fantasy story is Stephen King, and his Dark Tower series.

OK, so he admits himself he is influenced by Tolkien, but in the DT collection of books I cannot see too many references (if any) to Middle-earth.

Ok, so perhaps one! You could compare the rainbow stones to the Palantiri, but even THIS is a loose connection to me. The rainbow stones are far much MORE than the seeing stones in LOTR.

To me, the Dark Tower series of books is the 2nd best thing I have read to LOTR. And to me, Roland of Gilead is one of the best written characters I have ever read.

Another trilogy I haven't heard mentioned here, and I'm surprised about is Pullman's His Dark Materials. But I'm glad people don't see this work as original as I don't believe it is myself. It could be that Pullman himself has dissed LOTR (ie he's used the good old 'no characterisation' cliche about Tolkien), but I see many throwbacks to Tolkien's plot in Pullman's trilogy. For example, two main characters 'sacrifice' themselves in a position not unfamilliar with the cracks of doom and the last scene in the last book is very Grey Havens-like. (PS regarding Pullman's point on the lack of characterisation in lotr, the only character to me that stands out in his trilogy is Iorek Byrnison).
Essex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.