Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
02-26-2007, 06:54 PM | #1 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
|
Question about CT's editing hand in the Sil
Hi, folks. I'm new around here, obviously. I performed a search to try to find the answer to this, but couldn't find what I was looking for, so I thought I'd ask it here.
I'm a big fan of The Silmarillion and have just begun reading it again for the first time in several years. I'm aware that the Sil's place in Tolkien's "canon" is up for debate; I also know that HoME contains a wealth of knowledge dealing with how Christopher Tolkien went about compiling his father's work, and then published posthumously. Unfotunately, I've yet to read HoME. So my question is this: To what extent did Chrisopher Tolkien play in "editing" his father's work for the Silmarillion? Was he... A. The "voice", or narrator in effect of the Sil, using the stories written by his father and presenting them in the stylistic manner of his choosing (syntactical, dictional, etc.) B. Merely the curator of his father's previously written works, splicing them together to form a narrative comprised of JRR's own words C. Some undefinable combination of the two? --- I guess what I'm interested in finding out is this: Was it the father's stories and the son's words or was it the father's words and the son's arrangement? I know it's probably somewhere in the middle, but I'd like to know a little about how the book that I'm reading came to be. Can anyone shed some light? |
02-27-2007, 01:52 AM | #2 | |
A Mere Boggart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under the bed
Posts: 4,737
|
Fair enough question!
Given that Tolkien appointed Christopher full rights over his work, we can say that even had Christopher rewritten Tolkien's work in whatever manner he wished, that Tolkien would have been content. Here's what Tolkien said in his will: Quote:
Nobody could have done a better job than CT, except perhaps another member of the Tolkien family; I believe the job will pass on to Adam Tolkien when Christopher passes away. The family are fully involved in the work of the estate and fully involved with The Tolkien Society - don't believe some of the rubbish put about around the net about sinister intentions because it's blatantly untrue and unfair. Sorry, had to say that. It's one of those things which really irks me.
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|
|
02-27-2007, 04:29 PM | #3 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
|
Hey, thanks for responding!
I'm with you really, and do understand that Christopher has the right to do what he has done with his father's work. And for that I am very thankful--The Silmarillion is probably my favorite Tolkien work, and without his contributions in getting the stuff compiled and published we would have been oblivious to the true scope and grandeur of his father's mythology. So I harbor no ill feelings whatsover. I'm still curious though if the extent of his involvement in arranging the actual word is actually known: Is JRR responsible for the writing style? I know some call it "dry" or "detatched", but I find that a boon to its authority (in a way) and relish the almost poetic flow of language. Do we know if JRR actually wrote his Silmarillion tales in that manner or did Christopher take his father's ideas and present them as such? Knowing that the latter is responsible wouldn't detract from my enjoyment; I'm just wondering who to give credit to . |
03-18-2007, 11:53 PM | #4 |
Loremaster of Annúminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,301
|
CRT's Editing
Maglor,
The best way to answer your question is to refer you to the History of Middle-earth, especially Volumes X and XI, which contain Tolkien's latest (post-Lord of the Rings) versions of the First Age material. In general, your Option 2 is essentially correct: the text Christopher published in 1977 was 'assembled,' not written, by him: the words are all JRRT's (well, about 96% aside from half of one chapter), 'selected and arranged' from the Professor's mountain of disparate manuscripts. |
03-19-2007, 06:00 PM | #5 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
|
Thanks for your response as well. I had wondered how much of a role Christopher Tolkien played...interesting to know that his presence was, for the most part, minimal. And regarding the HoME, it's definitely on my "To-Read" list...so I hope to discover more about the process in due time.
But I appreciate you answering my basic question. Thanks again! |
03-20-2007, 12:30 PM | #6 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
You may want to take a look at the Silmarillion chapter discussions where I've been highlighting some of the more significant changes and editorial decisions CT made.
|
03-20-2007, 05:49 PM | #7 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
|
Thanks for the link, Aiwendel. I've just purchased Unfinished Tales as well, so already I'm beginning to get a clearer picture about how The Silmarillion was shaped .
|
03-21-2007, 11:24 PM | #8 | |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|