Log in

View Full Version : **RotK - Frodo (Elijah Wood)**


Estelyn Telcontar
12-16-2003, 01:07 PM
What did you think of Frodo in this movie and the way Wood acted the role?

mark12_30
12-17-2003, 04:27 AM
There was a lot to like: Shelob's Lair; up in the tower; lots of good stuff. Sammath Naur was superb I thought. The conflicts between Frodo and Sam were well done (if non-canonical.) <P>I was surprised after the Ring was destroyed that Frodo looked a lot more healed-up than I thought he would. I expected the weariness so apparent at Sammath Naur to still be reflected in him; but once he's returned to The Shire he seemed all rosy again. Somehow his departure didn't seem so vital. If I hadn't read the books I don't think that I would have gotten that. I think if I was the makeup artists, I'd have left him looking a lot more worn and aged, to get that point across. <P>(Who was that guy speaking Bilbo's lines?? Overdone?? Some of that aging should have been put on Frodo...)<P>I'll have to see the Grey Havens a couple more times, and then I'll be able to decide more about that. It's just quite different from what I had expected; I wish I'd seen more spoilers about it.<P>But then, I'll see it again this afternoon.

burrahobbit
12-17-2003, 05:23 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>I'll have to see the Grey Havens a couple more times<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I have no idea what you are talking about.

mark12_30
12-17-2003, 05:31 AM
Doesn't surprise me.

Lindolirian
12-17-2003, 07:55 AM
The tension between Sam and Frodo was something that I consider a good change. I felt tears in my eyes when Frodo told Sam to go home...

Finnguala
12-17-2003, 09:41 AM
He was great!! And so was Sean... ooh man, I have never cried so much during a movie!!

*LillianTinuviel*
12-17-2003, 10:10 AM
I haven't seen ROTK yet... , but I am so trying 2 get to a theater ASAP, & the you people's comments are making me even more eager!!

Birdland
12-17-2003, 11:38 AM
Truth be told, I'm a little disappointed with Elijah Wood's performance. He was a perfect hobbit in the first film, but I saw no growth - or wearing down - of his character as the films progressed. <P>He tried, I know, but he just will not let go. His smile in particular just bugs the crap out of me.<P>And I agree Mark, the make-up department really failed the actor. After the Hobbits return to the Shire, Frodo pretty much looks like he did when he set out. Pretty as ever, except for the stump. Couldn't he at least have had a scar and a few crow's feet to suggest what he had been through? Perhaps Mr. Wood has a "Pretty" clause in his contract.

Eomer of the Rohirrim
12-17-2003, 01:28 PM
He seemed too weak all through <I>The Two Towers</I> and then became strong too late at parts in <I>The Return Of The King</I>. Especially when he suddenly got the energy to sprint to the Crack of Doom.<P>But I thought he was good. Not perhaps a standout performance (which the role really requires?) but a pretty good one.<P>I'm glad there were no rolling eyes this time around from Mr. Baggins!

Carorëiel
12-17-2003, 04:12 PM
I thought Elijah Wood did a great job--I was impressed with this performance of the character in Mordor.<P>A question, though--after Frodo is captured, the orcs take his clothes--except for his pants. We see him lying there with no shirt and Sam has the comment about not walking around Mordor in nothing but his skin. Then we see Sam and Frodo in orc armor. Fine. The next time we see them they are both wearing pants and hobbit shirts. Where did Frodo's shirt come from???? (And his suspenders are there, too, I think.)

Oddwen
12-17-2003, 04:33 PM
I think he was my favorite this time around. Like cheese and wine, his performance got better over time.<P>Hee hee, cheese.

DarkRose
12-17-2003, 05:04 PM
I thought our dear Mr.Wood did an excellent job of portraying Frodo this time around. You could see the sense of dread about him and you could almost feel the pain.<P>I think the whole thing with him sprinting to the crack of doom was, perhaps, like his "second wind" or something. <P>I agree that perhaps he should have looked more worn and weathered at the end of the movie, but still.. The renewal of his appearance kind of reminded me how the great weight of the ring was truly lifted from him.

Enorëiel
12-17-2003, 05:35 PM
Elijah did an excellent job portraying Frodo. In fact, I've come to love Frodo even more! <P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> but once he's returned to The Shire he seemed all rosy again. Somehow his departure didn't seem so vital. If I hadn't read the books I don't think that I would have gotten that<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I'd say so! I seem to remember him being more worn in the books. I was a bit disappointed in this, you know what, if they wanted to make him look all rosy again, why not just leave him in Middle-Earth? That's about the just of it. There was a reason he was leaving, the movie didn't portray this very well (besides the whole journey, I'm talking about post-journey wise).<P>Other than this I absolutely LOVED Frodo (granted I really loved seeing him cheery and if I did have it my way, he wouldn't have left for the Grey Havens but hey - I'm not Peter Jackson, I can't change whatever I want )!!!!! I can't get enough of Frodo! Oh and Carorëiel, very good point; I was wondering the same thing.

Orual
12-17-2003, 05:53 PM
It almost seemed to me like a light bulb went on over Elijah Wood's head--all of a sudden it was like "Oh! Yeah! That's Frodo!" His vulnerability and the fact that he was so open to Gollum's little poisons read so well in Elijah's performance; even though it deviated from the books, I could completely believe it. There was less of the big-eyed lost-little-lamb aura around him, and more desperation and hopelessness. I found some of the Frodo/Sam/Gollum scenes excruciating to watch, not because they were bad, but because I could empathize so entirely with the pain that I could see the characters going through. When Frodo sent Sam away, with fairly subtle facial and vocal expressions Elijah managed to convey that though Frodo had succumbed to Gollum's suggestion, there was still a part of him that was struggling against it.<P>I think my favorite Frodo scene from the Return of the King, and perhaps the whole trilogy, was the scene at Mt. Doom. While Frodo is holding the Ring over the Cracks of Doom, the tension and mental agony that he is going through is so visible on his face, and then the moment of decision has just enough cold, out-of-character calculation to let us know that Frodo isn't really working on his own will. And when he said, after the Ring was destroyed, "I'm glad you're with me, Sam Gamgee, here at the end of all things," I started to cry, because there was this resignation and sense of a peace almost forgotten in his voice.<P>As may be obvious, I thought Elijah did a remarkable job; Return of the King showed off his best acting of the trilogy, in my opinion.

Arathiriel
12-17-2003, 06:13 PM
You know, PJ did right when he cast Elijah Wood as Frodo and Sean Astin as Sam because those two managed to get me to crying the most through this movie!<P>My heart broke when Frodo told Sam to go home and oh my it was nearly disturbing how real Elijah's portrayal of the Ring taking Frodo was!<P>Oh Elbereth - <B>I LOVE THIS MOVIE</B>!!!!!

Diamond18
12-18-2003, 12:47 AM
I've always liked Elijah Wood as Frodo, but I did think there was something definitely <I>better</I> about his portrayal in this last movie. I loved it. It was kind of funny that he seemed to have more strength and determination <I>now</I> than he did setting out "fresh", but by itself I was quite happy with it.<P>I still didn't like him telling Sam to go home, however. It wasn't a <I>horrible</I> change, but I just didn't "believe" it even as an alternate ME movie-universe.<P>He did look to "rosy" afterwards, but to be honest, that was one thing I "hated" about the book. "Hated" in a good way, I mean, as in I knew it was fitting and deep and all, and <I>agree</I> with Tolkien that that's the way it was, but I <I>wished</I> it didn't have to be like that. So I can't really complain about Frodo not looking so bad, because it's what I always secretly wished for. If I had been making the movie I would have probably gone for the really weary appearence and behavior and hated every minute of it. I'm being really hard to follow, I know, but I've always had that ambivalant spot about Frodo. I just can't read the parts about his waning in the Shire after the scouring because it's too sad. I don't really care that non book readers will wonder why he has to leave, after all. I'm selfish that way.

Arwen1858
12-18-2003, 01:31 AM
I think he was wonderful, and deserves an Acadamy Award for best actor!! His performance was amazing. I think his portrayal of Frodo was perfect. He just fit the part so incredibly well!

Essex
12-18-2003, 06:47 AM
Wood's best acting comes when he is on the ship in the Grey Havens. He turns round and the look of Joy on his face is beautiful. The only other time we see an identical look on his face is at the very begining of the film when he first hears Gandalf. I'm sure the comparison was meant by Jackson. (The looks are both more joyful than even his look when he's in bed after he's been rescued by Gandalf). <P>It's like a couple of bookends to the film. <P>It's heartbreaking looking at Frodo's face at the begining of the film when you know what he has to go through, but the smile at the end of rotk now helps.<P>It's just sad that Sam will not follow the Movie Frodo into the west, as he was not a Ring Bearer in the film.

mark12_30
12-18-2003, 07:29 AM
He carried it the whole time Frodo was Out. Doesn't matter whether he put it on or not. He'll go. 'Course only bookHounds will know that.

Essex
12-18-2003, 08:15 AM
I'm not sure what a bookhound is. Does reading the book at least a dozen times and all of the histories / silmarillion count?<P>Anyway, how does having the Ring in your pocket count as 'bearing' the ring? I personally believe that he would have to WEAR the ring to be a Ring Bearer. He only had to travel with the Ring for at most a couple of miles (according to Journeys of Frodo map book).<P>From the book then, Tom Bombadil a ring bearer (he actually wore it). But do you count Gandalf as a bearer of the One Ring when he took it from Frodo for a while at Bag End? In the film, do you regard Boromir as a Ring Bearer for holding the ring by its chain? <P>These are not flippant arguments. I mean what I say. Sam would surely have to wear the ring on his finger to be called a ring bearer. Thus in the film version, he would not follow Frodo across the Sundering Sea.<p>[ 9:17 AM December 18, 2003: Message edited by: Essex ]

mark12_30
12-18-2003, 08:41 AM
To "bear" something means to carry it. Not neccessarily to wear it.

Elentári_O_Most_Mighty_1
12-18-2003, 09:41 AM
I thought Gandy was a RingBearer because he bore one of the Elven Rings (I forget which one). <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> I'm glad there were no rolling eyes this time around from Mr. Baggins! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I personally loved the way he did that, but perhaps it's just me.<BR>I thought Frodo was on too much of a plateau- he seemed to reach the depths of his exhaustion in TTT. But hey- it was a really good effort, Gollum was amazing and Sam was a wonderful supporting hobbit. But when I was watching it this girl was giggling all the way through the sad bits (I felt ready to kill her- I know her, she's in my class). Bilbo freaked me out- he looked rather like Gollum when he was entering the mountain...

Essex
12-18-2003, 10:23 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> To "bear" something means to carry it. Not neccessarily to wear it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Disagree. You are taking the term too literally I believe.<P>PS Pedantically I looked up 'bear' in Webster's. There's quite a lot of meaning to the word. It's not just a cuddly toy!<p>[ 11:27 AM December 18, 2003: Message edited by: Essex ]

Maeglanthirion
12-18-2003, 10:35 AM
bear-To carry from one place to another; transport. <BR> I thought he did a fabulous job. The movie portrayed very well his wearing down throughout the movie. In TTT, you could tell it was getting to him. And now on Mt. Doom, he was like almost dead with exhaustion. That run to the Crack of Doom I think was like his final effort. He didn't think he was going to ever return to the Shire and he was not going to give up and die this close to his goal, on the slopes of Mt. Doom. I thought he did a great job. Oscar worthy? Maybe.

Arwen1858
12-18-2003, 12:32 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> Wood's best acting comes when he is on the ship in the Grey Havens. He turns round and the look of Joy on his face is beautiful <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Wasn't that wonderful? I loved it!

mark12_30
12-18-2003, 02:14 PM
What was he thinking?! Was it joy that the war-- external and internal-- was over?<BR>Was he looking forward to his own (and Bilbo's) arrival-- the white shores and green hills under a swift sunrise? Or was he "seeing" Sam's future-- kids, numerous consecutive terms as Mayor, long and happy life...? Or all of it at once?

Gorwingel
12-18-2003, 06:08 PM
I very much enjoyed the performance of Elijah in this film. But his look when he is poisoned by Shelob is freaky! Usually his eyes don't bother me much, but this time they did. I couldn't get emotional during the scene where Sam is cradling him because that look is just so scary. Someone needs to tell Mr. Jackson that he needs to have the eyes close when people die or get posioned, because if not it looks like there still alive (or frozen). But I know, I know, sometimes when people die their eyes don't close, but It is just that in the book there was (I think) a passage about how peaceful Frodo looked, but he didn't look peaceful here! It just bugs me.<P>Other than that, I personally didn't think that he looked too happy when he was in the Shire, you could see that he still had a little weariness, but yes, it wasn't as much as in the book. But the final scene when he is looking back from the Ship at the Grey Havens, I love that. That will be the image of the movie Frodo that I will remember forever <P>Oh, and I loved his new silver waistcoat too

Lyta_Underhill
12-19-2003, 01:42 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Someone needs to tell Mr. Jackson that he needs to have the eyes close when people die or get posioned, because if not it looks like there still alive (or frozen). <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Actually, I think having his eyes open was a very good touch. The combination of this and the unearthly-white face really bring home the idea in the viewers' minds and Sam's mind that Frodo is not just poisoned, but looks DEAD. It was a good cinematic device. The staring eyes are much more disturbing and final to my mind. (I'm kind of glad they didn't add the "sickly green" shade that Frodo proceeds to turn as Sam watches...)<P>I didn't much care for Frodo telling Sam to go home, but that didn't bother me as much as the fact the Sam went! (Oh yes, Mr. Frodo tells me to go so I'll go, even though I know he is accompanied by a villain who I KNOW means to murder him...) I don't think so! I thought that was a little TOO obvious as a device for conflict. The dynamic between the three (Gollum, Frodo, Sam) works pretty well the way PJ set it up, though, even though it is not in line with Tolkien's original.<P>As for Frodo's "young look" after the War of the Ring, I thought it was unnaturally youthful. He looked as young as he had in the Shire of the pre-quest days. I wondered at that time whether they had meant for him to partially transform to a more pure "elvish" look. Maybe it was part of his own 'fading?'. I had expected more wear and tear on Frodo's visage, and I was rather surprised at how decrepit Bilbo had become, even in the short time we had not seen him! <P>But all the previous commentary of mine above says nothing about Elijah Wood's own performance, really. More a commentary on how Frodo's character and physical development was handled. I must say that much of my opinion rests on the peculiar inflection I hear during the "Naked in the Dark" speech. There is something extra in his voice at that point that separates him completely, as if he is so far from Samwise and the waking world that he is having trouble even describing it. I find that, no matter what mangling of Frodo's character has gone before, the Mordor experience wipes him clean; it becomes a struggle beyond hope, a naked duel of sorts, and for me, a twist of inflection in Elijah's voice brings this home. All else falls away, and somehow, I can actually get inside the once inaccessible realm of Frodo in Mordor that is eternally seen by the reader from Sam's point of view. <I>Seeing</I> Frodo articulating in this way gives me a window into his soul that I think I only saw before through a reader's perception of Sam's thoughts. Either that, or I understand and identify with Sam a little better now, and that window is all that can be seen and should not be opened further, for there are still matters to be settled. "Let's be done with it then." Sam says simply, and gathers the strength that has become hardened within him. This moment is priceless, powerful and shows the great acting prowess of both Elijah and Sean.<P>I'm sure there's more to be said, but thanks for listening to my observations! <P>Cheers,<BR>Lyta

Finwe
12-19-2003, 12:20 PM
Elijah Wood was SOOOOO BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!! I was bawling like a baby by the end, both during the scenes at Mt. Doom and the Sammath Naur, and at the Grey Havens. Elijah was absolutely perfect for the role, I don't think anyone else could have played Frodo like he did.

Jjudvven
12-19-2003, 12:23 PM
Well, although I thought that Wood wasn't the ideal actor to portray Frodo, he did an excellent job. In the first movie, I had a hard time seeing Wood as Frodo(he just looked way to young, and Sam too old in my opinion), over the course of three years, I have gotten used to him, and now would have a hard time seeing him as anything else.

Nienna, sister of Feanturi
12-19-2003, 03:16 PM
I thought Elijah Wood was amazing in all the films, especially this one. I really can’t imagine anyone else as Frodo<BR> <P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> While Frodo is holding the Ring over the Cracks of Doom, the tension and mental agony that he is going through is so visible on his face <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>I agree, I thought that bit was done so well. I was really scared they were going to muck it up, because I think it has so much potential as a scene. I thought that maybe Frodo might have a monologue to tell us what was going on in his mind but when it came to it they didn’t need to. It actually managed to be better than I imagined it! <BR>I agree with Enoreiel about the Havens- it was understated and didn’t really make that much sense. Frodo didn’t seem to be tortured enough after destroying it.- there was nothing about him missing the Ring, or still desiring it which I always thought was one of the central reasons Frodo was so unhappy. I think it’s a pity they missed out the bit with Arwen giving Frodo that jewel thing. (Not that I didn’t think Liv got quite enough screen time). Elijah, oscar worthy? Hell, yeah!

faenaduial
12-20-2003, 01:09 AM
I think this was Elijah's best film. Although I may not have always liked the material the writers gave him, his performance throughout the movie was spot on.<P>We are truly blessed that in one film we have unbelievable performances by so many actors. Elijah, Sean, Andy and Billy were all standouts among a very good cast.<P>From our first look at Frodo during RotK you could see and feel his deterioration. <P>I had no problem with showing Frodo appearing to be restored to health when he was back in the Shire because you could just see the sadness in his eyes. I thought he did an excellent job showing how Frodo, although returned to his "normal" life, could never be the same. No make-up was needed. That is what true acting is about.<P>Bravo!

mark12_30
12-20-2003, 10:22 AM
There is an article on Tolkien's faith and catholicism posted at TORn, and here is a clip from the end of it. I include it because it explains Philippa Boyens' interpretation of that final smile from Frodo which so haunts and mystifies me. Apparently Boyens and Walsh are coming at this from two different angles, which I suppose isn't suprising, but Boyens has an explaination for that final smile. Comparing her take to what I find in TOlkien's letters, I find her take quite accurate. <P>SPOILER WARNING, of course. <P>Here is Boyens' explaination. <P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> <BR>“One of the things Tolkien understood, because he was a [Christian] humanist,” Boyens noted, “is that we all fail, and we have the ability within us to fail. Faith requires us to believe in a higher power. Gandalf very early on in the book says, ‘The ring came to Bilbo and in that moment something else was at work.’ Not the [ring’s] designer, the maker, this evil power, but some other power was at work. So it’s whether you believe in that or not, whether you choose to believe in that or not.” <P>In order to underscore her point, she referred to a key plot point. (Warning: If you don’t know how the story ends, you might want to skip the last paragraph.) <P>“Frodo dragged himself to that point and failed. And another power intervened,” Boyens said. Then, referring to the end of Frodo’s life in Middle Earth, Boyen added, “He ultimately surrenders to that power at the end of this movie, which is one of the most beautiful moments in the movie.” <BR> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>The entire article can be found <A HREF="http://www.ncregister.com/current/NCRWEB/lead1.htm" TARGET=_blank>here</A>.<p>[ 12:18 PM December 20, 2003: Message edited by: mark12_30 ]

Child of the 7th Age
12-20-2003, 11:21 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> “Frodo dragged himself to that point and failed. And another power intervened,” Boyens said. Then, referring to the end of Frodo’s life in Middle Earth, Boyen added, “He ultimately surrenders to that power at the end of this movie, which is one of the most beautiful moments in the movie.” <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Whoa! That's an extremely interesting quote from Boyens. I would not have suspected that kind of subtlety. And while I don't feel Frodo would have expressed himself in exactly those terms, it does line up with what Tolkien said in his Letters about Frodo's continuing temptation from the Ring, his shame over what he'd done (or rather what he had been unable to do), and his latent desire to have been the hero rather than a mere instrument of Providence. None of that, of course, is alluded to directly in the film.<P>Still, Tolkien's Frodo never came quite that far towards healing. In the Letters, Tolkien says he's not sure if Frodo would find peace within the circles of this world, even within the blessed realm of the West. And that seems in keeping with the author's personality -- the way he vacillated between hope and sadness (dare I say despair?).<P>Yet, I have to admit that when I saw Frodo's smile at the end of the movie, it was the scene I found most poignant. To me it said that somehow, someway, Frodo was going to be alright. And I guess I wanted to know that. I don't think I'm the only one to feel that way. There are many fanfictions written about Frodo's time in the West, but never have I seen one where Frodo remains as broken and despairing as he did in the Shire with his periodic illnesses. <P>Despite what JRRT said in the Letters, most readers even come away from the book with the feeling that Frodo will indeed be healed. The author seems to give us a hint of reassurance when the Elven ship approaches the shores of Tol Rressea and Tolkien describes what Frodo saw --- <P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> And then it seemed to him that as in his dream in the house of Bombadil, the grey rain-curtain turned all to silver glass and was rolled back, and he beheld white shores and beyond them a far green country under a swift sunrise. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Whenever I read these beautiful words, I can't hope but feel that Frodo is going to be alright. Of course, in the movie, similar lines were given to Gandalf in his discussion with Pippin in Minas Tirith, so they couldn't be used at the end of the movie (as they might have done in a voiceover). So perhaps Frodo's smile is meant to reassure us in the same way that Tolkien did in his brief but poignant description of the shores of the Blessed Lands.<p>[ 1:42 PM December 20, 2003: Message edited by: Child of the 7th Age ]

Alucard
12-20-2003, 11:35 AM
Wow, that explanation was great. Thanks for posting that mark12_30.

Failivrin
12-20-2003, 03:32 PM
I thought he was magnificent. i was really surprised because after TTT i was expecting him to be bad. The way he looked at the Sammath Naur was just perfect.<P>i wasn't really that fond of the Grey Havens and i would have liked to see him more aged.

Lathriel
12-23-2003, 12:58 AM
I agree with Faenduial that Elijah's performance in ROTK was the strongest. At the cracks of doom his acting was just perfect. He really got to the climax and made it a true climax to remember story and acting wise.

mark12_30
12-23-2003, 07:49 AM
Child: <P>Your point about Tolkien's stated uncertainty regarding Frodo's healing is well taken. Keep in mind the difference between healing and surrender. While they often go together, it's not necessarily so. The understanding that Frodo surrendered still leaves room for the Professor's doubt whether he will be healed *<I>in this life</I>*. (Of course, I want him to be!) What the surrender gives us, however (and I believe that doctrinally Tolkien would have held this same confidence) is that even if he is not healed in *this* life, it means that he certainly will be healed in eternity.<P>Weighing eternity in the balance, that quite satisfies me.<P>Boyen's comments have repeatedly amazed me since I read them, and made my third viewing all the more poignant. I'm very glad she was on the project. (!!!!!!*10**5)<p>[ 9:04 AM December 23, 2003: Message edited by: mark12_30 ]

Theron Bugtussle
12-23-2003, 09:30 AM
I agree with those whose opinions are that Wood played Frodo best in this film (RotK). I think it was in large measure due to the Tolkien-authored buildup over the course of the three movies: the emotion, determination, sacrifice, and at the end, the refusal to "do this thing." That is pure Tolkien, and PJ stayed with a winner.<P>Speaking of PJ, I disagree with the thought that Frodo's rejection of Sam is in any way a minor departure from Tolkien. Did the book story need more drama? NO. It was like the last straw for me. I had endured so many major and minor of his 'improvements' over Tolkien throughout the movies up to that point, that <I>at the Cracks of Doom, my only thought was, "PJ is not going to have Frodo decide to keep the Ring! Damn him!"</I> It nearly totally destroyed the scene for me. I will have to watch it again in the hope that, now that I know how it was actually done in the movie, I will not react in a PJ-instigated Pavlovian response. (<I>"See how he obeys--like a whipped cur!"</I>)<P>RE Frodo looking weary on his return to the Shire: I do not recall that from the book. I think the movie portrayed well Frodo's sense of alienation. Once the Scouring of the Shire was completed, Frodo just wanted to blend into the background, but he also thought he should be acclaimed in some way by those he saved and for whom he sacrificed so much. And it seemed to him that few appreciated it, and fewer were interested in any of his story. <P>So I do not think it was so much a weariness or aging, but this alienation, and the recurrence of the wounds that drove him to seek departure with the elves.

Tintalle
12-23-2003, 11:59 AM
I think Elijah Wood did an excellent job!! I liked him best here. I liked the part where he was hanging over the pit and you can see it in his eyes he wanted to let go (or maybe it's just my illsuion )and Sam reaching out his hand. Terrific!! <P>As for the part that he, finding the strength to run, my theory is after fighting Gollum, he just got envigorated by it, knowing that someone who coveted the ring that bad was close. (And correct me if I'm wrong but I read somewhere in the book that Frodo, getting weak as he got to Mordor, became somewhat stronger when Gollum tried to get the ring from him ... it's like instinct?) Oh well, I love Elijah's performance here. Bravo!

Kalimac
12-23-2003, 03:47 PM
I thought Wood was excellent in ROTK, and after TTT I'd been trepidatious, to say the least (as in "How much more can Frodo collapse, anyway?") But he was pitch-perfect; what I especially admired was the way he gradually transformed into someone who was basically insane (like others, I thought he handled the "I see it with my waking eyes" bit very well), but how, after the Ring was destroyed, you could almost see his real self snap back into place. The scene where he and Sam are sitting on the rock, waiting for what they think is inevitable death, somehow it's clear just from looking at his face that the old Frodo is back, if damaged. (And it was nice to see him holding Sam up, for a change!)

mark12_30
12-24-2003, 09:21 AM
Superb article on Frodo <A HREF="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/dalfonzo200312220001.asp" TARGET=_blank>here</A>.

Theron Bugtussle
12-24-2003, 01:53 PM
<B>mark12_30</B>, nice link--very well stated!

BoromirsBeard
12-26-2003, 03:27 AM
Interesting article, but I don't agree that Sam replaces Frodo as the hero. Sam himself says, "I can't carry it, but I can carry you" - a line to drive home exactly which task is the more difficult. The audience knows that.<P>Elijah is hauntingly good in this role. As has been said, the "naked in the dark" line came from somewhere terrifying within. And I think the weariness remains very much apparent when he returns to the Shire.

Evisse the Blue
12-26-2003, 04:28 AM
<A HREF="http://www.petitiononline.com/EliOscar/" TARGET=_blank>Sign the Oscar Petition for Elijah (or don't sign it - in any case here it is)</A>

aleesa
12-26-2003, 05:19 AM
It is in my honest opinion that Elijah Wood did a great job playing Frodo. I can't imagine someone else playing him. That part at Mt Doom just blew me away.

Arwen Imladris
12-26-2003, 09:26 PM
Elijah Wood was great. I really got to see the turmoil that the ring put him through. I think that he should have looked more worn when he returned to the shire, not much but a little. One other point is that they probably filmed that at the beginning, while they were shooting stuff from the Fellowship, so they probably didn't really have a clear idea of what Frodo was going to be by the end of ROTK. <P>About the opened eyes, I think that it could have worked, but not with EW's eyes. They are too big and too blue for him to look dead with them open. Perhaps if they were just partly shut he would have looked more poisoned. On the other hand they helped make the rest of him look really dead and pale.

The Saucepan Man
12-27-2003, 08:28 PM
Interesting article, Helen. But I am not sure that I wholly agree with it. The author says:<P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> It’s no wonder that many viewers are thinking of Sam — who follows Frodo at a distance and (as in the book) eventually saves his life — as the real hero of the piece. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>But wasn't that Tolkien's own view, as expressed in his <I>Letters</I>, that Sam is the real hero of the story?<P>Personally, I feel that there is sufficient material in the books to justify Frodo's degeneration in RotK. Yes, even to the extent of him sending Sam home, which set up what was, for me, a great sequence in Shelob's lair. To my mind, the fault with that line was that Sam actually does set off home, which I cannot believe he would ever have done. I would much have preferred it if the film had just left him sitting there in tears.<P>I did think that Elijah's Frodo succumbed to the Ring too much in TTT. But I thought that his degeneration was played just right in RotK. To my mind, it mirrors the way in which Frodo is portrayed during the closing chapters of the book. And, without it, Frodo's final decision to claim the Ring would have seemed too unbelieveable, particularly to film (ie non-book reading) audiences. It is also consistent with the way that Jackson has chosen to play up the power of the Ring.<P>Although I found Elijah Wood's portrayal of Frodo as just a little bit <I>too</I> "wimpy" (for want of a better word) in the two previous films, I thought that his portrayal in the RotK film was spot on. It was a real eye-opener, and I have a lot more respect for Elijah Wood after having seen this film. The expressions playing across his face as he held the Ring over the Crack of Doom were just fantastic, and his delivery of "The Ring is mine" was, for me, just perfect.<P>Oh, and minimal eye-rolling too - did someone have a word with him about that? <P>In this film, I felt that Elijah's Frodo really came of age.

Theron Bugtussle
12-29-2003, 01:49 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>But wasn't that Tolkien's own view, as expressed in his Letters, that Sam is the real hero of the story?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Perhaps, so, <B>Saucepan Man</B>. But to me, Sam is the hero in the supporting role. It is clear that Frodo HAD to have Sam's company and assistance all along. He would never have made it into Mordor, let alone to Mt. Doom without him. <P>That said, the article seems to indicate the movie denigrates Frodo's nobility and the development of his maturing process. The rejection of Sam was not needed to set up any scene, each of which were fully capable of being handled with the right finesse as Tolkien originally did--all effective, all believable.<P>Frodo's nobility is evidenced, I think, in his acceptance of Gandalf's wisdom highlighting Bilbo's pity on Gollum. <I>"Now that I see him, I do pity him."</I> Sam is much more practical in repeatedly wanting to do away with Gollum. Only at the end, on Mt. Doom, does Frodo's consistent example raise Sam's sight as he (Sam) decides to spare Gollum himself.<P>Nobility does not mean sinlessness or unending strength, though, so Frodo falling completely under the influence of the ring at the Cracks of Doom still fits the story well.<P>Tolkien clearly needed these two heroes for different roles. However, I think I well agree with the article. PJ has cheapened Frodo--unnecessarily. And perhaps it is a comment on the culture today.

mark12_30
12-29-2003, 02:25 PM
I've said this before elsewhere, but briefly: I admire Wood's interpretation of the role he was handed by PJ & co; but I think PJ & Co handed him a diminished role. Too bad!! <P>There are those who disagree, but I think Wood could have handled more than they offered him. <P>McKellan patrolled his scenes book-in-hand, and fought for many of the Professor's lines. Bravo. Too bad E. Wood did not have that solid reading background behind him. He had to depend on PJ & CO; and I think they oversimplified the role.<P>That said, I still think Sammath Naur was excellent.<P><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> Tolkien clearly needed these two heroes for different roles. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Yes. I highly recommend Ane Petty's book, "Tolkien in the Land of Heroes", for a discussion of just who is (or how many are) the hero(es) in LOTR. Fabulous book.<P> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> PJ has cheapened Frodo--unnecessarily. And perhaps it is a comment on the culture today. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I think so. It also reflects on PJ's own youth, I think. And I think that (unfortunately) is as it must be; if he were not young and energetic, he would not have had the drive to produce the work he did. Wisdom, or ambition? In this case, ambition was what got the job done. I do wish he'd had added age and wisdom on his staff of writers, but there it is.<p>[ 3:30 PM December 29, 2003: Message edited by: mark12_30 ]

Lily Bracegirdle
12-31-2003, 12:58 PM
I think Elijah Wood did a very good job of bringing Frodo to life. He's an excellent actor, though I think Sean Astin outshone him in this movie. I agree with Mark12_30 that missteps in Frodo's characterization were more due to PJ and the writers than the actor himself.<P>As for Frodo's "youthful and rosy" appearance at the end, I think that was due to those scenes being filmed at the beginning of the shoot when Elijah was still young and didn't know what was in store for his character. They would have been more effective if they had been filmed at the end of the shoot when Elijah had had a chance to grow up more and understand what happened to his character.<P>-Lily

Evisse the Blue
01-09-2004, 10:12 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> I admire Wood's interpretation of the role he was handed by PJ & co; but I think PJ & Co handed him a diminished role. Too bad!! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I agree. You could indeed see the difference between his performance and McKellen's or Lee's or Mortensen's. He did well, but minimally well - with only as much detail and subtlety of performance. It was as if he was playing a single musical note, with the same dedication and talent, but over and over again. At least that's how it was in FOTR and TTT. In ROTK, he's evolved. Like someone said before, 'a lightbulb appeared over his head, and realized how Frodo is supposed to be'. The scene at Mt Doom was pure perfection, and despite the eye-candy provided by visual effects, it could not have achieved perfection without Elijah's matching performance. <P>Let's face it, he did well in this entire enterprise, he did not fail PJ's trust and proved wrong all those who did not see him as Frodo. It's a remarkable thing, considering the pressure and especially at his age (ahem - I sound like I'm 20 yrs older, in fact I've the same age! ). Anyway - give Elijah that nomination! He deserves it!