Best Post of the Week

[Bêthberry]

Yes, yes, we have the reputations system, but we cannot see all the highly rated posts there, only the tallies, unless Barrow Wight does his magic again.

Therefore, let us here make nominations for the laurel wreath. And make good our reasons.

To start things off, I hereby nominate Kransha's post #30 (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=353224&postcount=30) on the Why There were no women in the fellowship thread in Mirth.

Firstly, the modesty with which Mr. Kransha begins his address. A true gentleman, his tongue never drools but is kept firmly in his cheek. Second, the dexterity with which he addresses issues of philological import. Mr. Kransha's overarching metaphorical grasp of golden and star takes my breath away. Third, his grasp of early mythological texts which allows him to boldly make interpretations where others have not gone before. We all knew about the derivation of 'Gandalf' but who had the patience, perception, and downright prescience to seek out Gimli? Fourth, Mr. Kransha's very clever re-visioning of the very stale Legolas-Gimli question should put to rest henceforth any questionable aspertions about those who only serve. 'Nuff said here.

Fellow Downers, I ask you: Can Mirth get any better than this?

[Imladris]

No. That is Mirth at its best. A perfect example of humour. *claps hands*

*mutters under breath* Intelligence I tell you...pure intelligence.

[Bêthberry]

Right. I forgot reason the fifth: it's darn funny.

[Encaitare]

Ah, yes, I just read that one. Delightful; it gave me many a chuckle. Note to Kransha: I wanted to add to your reputation for it, but apparently I gave recently and can't again for awhile... oh well, I suppose it's the thought that counts. :p

[Estelyn Telcontar]

Bêthberry, what a wonderful thread idea! I'd have seconded your nomination for Kransha's great post if I hadn't read The Saucepan Man's post (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=353257&postcount=213) on the 'Reunification of the Entish Bow' RPG first. As it is, I must cast my vote for that one. My reason(s):

This is parody at its very best! The names are hilarious, the characters well-drawn, their dialogues side-splitting, the ideas sparkle with wit (Aerophaunts!!), the clever inclusions of movie allusions and non-LotR references, the descriptive writing, especially at the beginning, commented by the sentence: One thing that could be said about the weather of Muddled-Mirth was that it had a profound sense of occasion. And all of that so well-written that the only complaint could be the one Tolkien heard about his book - it wasn't long enough!

I could quote the whole thing, but go ahead and read it yourself!! :D

[Bêthberry]

Estelyn, a superb nomination and one which I'm sure makes SaucepanMan feel better about how Kransha upstaged him on the Why are there no women in the Fellowship thread. :p :D

I am in a quandry here, as I have found another post which I think stands head and shoulders above the rest--and this isn't a quick shampoo job to get rid of the flakes. :rolleyes:

Am I allowed two nominations in one week? Can I say this is a tie? Yes, I believe I can.

Therefore, let me call upon kudos for Imladris' Post #1 (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=353437&postcount=1) on her thread The Capturing of Myth in the Movies forum.

Movie threads are rarely as well argued and well-thought out as Imladris' thread here. Often, they depend upon a simple statement of "well I liked" or "this is just my opinion" rather than a reasoned argument. (Not to be 'holier than thou' here, I've been guilty of this simplistic response myself.)

Imladris provides a clear sense of what she means by myth (well, okay, she cribbed it from Lewis, but she acknowledges that *insert winking smilie here as I might have used up my limit*) and by Peter Jackson's treatment of myth. She provides examples which demonstrate her point.

More importantly, I think she also gets us thinking about what a mythological impulse is. We all tend, I think, to refer off hand to Tolkien's mythology or Legendarium but we don't often ask just what it is that makes Tolkien's fantasy a mythology.

Definitely worth a read and very deserving of thoughtful replies!

[The Saucepan Man]

... makes SaucepanMan feel better about how Kransha upstaged him on the Why are there no women in the Fellowship thread.Aw, how could I feel too bitter! After all I was just going for a wind-up. :p

Thanks for the nomination, Esty. It does make me feel better about staying up to the wee hours to finish the post and feeling very bleary-eyed the next morning at work. :rolleyes:

I don't wish to make this thread too REB-centric, but I do feel compelled to nominate Mithadan's latest post in REB2 (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=353177&postcount=212) (I can't do that link to a single post thing, can anyone explain? Edit: I can now, thanks Helen).

This, to me, goes beyond good parody. It skilfully merges the parody of two different genres, not just by mention but by capturing the spirit of both at the same time. We have the wraith confused about his nature, a wonderful characterisation in itself, a reference to the wraith's well-known fear of water and a novel remedy for it, superb incorporation of other ongoing characters and, the icing on the cake, not just one but two fantastic parody characters from a well-known sci-fi classic. Can't you just hear Captain Cirkdan enunciating those words? As for a parrot (Dr Macaw, no less) uttering those famous words ... well, what more can I say?

This has just gotta be best (humorous) post of the week, if not year. :D

[mark12_30]

Saucie, look at the upper-righthand corner of a post. There's a green "#" and a yellow number. Clicking on the yellow number will display just that post. Then link as usual.

Watch out where the Huskies go
And do not eat the yellow snow;
But if on yellow text you click
You will find a BD link.

[HerenIstarion]

Can it be done statistically? Say, the post getting most reputation + most views is the winner for a given time period. The least unit may be week, and we may make monthly/yearly bulletin by the end of each month/year.

[Bêthberry]

Well, HI, numerical quantifying is one way to go and that is certainly a possibility. I think, though, that the kind of tallying you are suggesting can be done onlyby BarrowWight and he is already very busy managing the site--look at the great new game of magnetic poetry he has added yesterday. Would he have time for doing weekly,monthly or yearly analysis like that?

But to tell you the truth, I was really more interested in personal statements, in the reasons given for nominating any particular post. Numbers demonstrate popularity, and popularity can determine style preferences, but I was interested in our ideas of what makes a great post. There are two points here.

First is the way different people have of explaining their admiration. SpM's explanation of why he liked Mithadan's post so much is related very much to our nature as a discussion forum. His reasons highlight the qualities of Mithadan's post in a way that simple tallies of numbers or 'hits' would not. This can lead us into consideration in particular detail of what we value or enjoy here at the Downs. We can become more aware of the strength of this forum.

His reasons also suggest something about his personality, just as Estelyn's reasons show her values and preferences. Just compare the two! This leads to the second point, that preferences and evaluations are unique. Sometimes meaningful or valuable ideas can be missed because they don't reflect the majority opinion. Just because a majority or plurality of people have rated one post does not mean that a different person's rating of another post cannot tell us something about what we value here at the Downs. We can learn from each other's opinion.

I have to admit that I have been too busy in RL to keep up with the formidable reading over all of this forum and so did not nominate any posts last week. (I wasn't even able to keep up with the Chapter by Chapter discussion. :( ) However, anyone is free to post here. The thread certainly doesn't depend on me and my reasons are only one person's opinion. Other Downers will have other preferences and tastes and they surely can make those known.

Right now, given the examples here, it seems to me that humour is of substantial worth to Downers, which is an interesting phenomenon, because, for example, davem is one of the two most highly rated posters here, but I cannot recall any of his contributions to Mirth or the RPGs. (not meaning to single out davem or to suggest any kind of question about the humorous posts or the rep system.) Maybe this week we will see 'serious' posts nominated here. Who can say.

But thanks, HI for bringing up the question and the thread. I'll keep my eye out for good posts to refer to here. And so should other Downers!

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Kransha posted a wonderful thread-initiating bundle of words recently, concerning one of my favourite characters Denethor. Check it out, c'est tres bien.

[HerenIstarion]

Lies, darn lies, and statistics!

And who would have thought! I have been tought that 'statistics knows everything'. The world is full of disenchantments...

But I do see the point. Let it be so.

Er, with that in mind, allow me to play severe auntie's part again, and request that posters should provide full title and authorship of the nominées, please? With links, if you don't mind? Thank you!

So, Eomer of the Rohirrim nominates Kransha's The Importance of Being Denethor (http://69.51.5.41/showthread.php?t=11256)

cheers

[Estelyn Telcontar]

I second that nomination of Kransha's new Denethor thread!

[HerenIstarion]

Now I've read it, I third the nomination

More, I would suggest to post it as an article (http://www.barrowdowns.com/articles.php) on the main site.

[davem]

Right now, given the examples here, it seems to me that humour is of substantial worth to Downers, which is an interesting phenomenon, because, for example, davem is one of the two most highly rated posters here, but I cannot recall any of his contributions to Mirth or the RPGs. (not meaning to single out davem or to suggest any kind of question about the humorous posts or the rep system.)

Unfortunately, I don't have enough time to post as much as I'd like on the Downs :( (also, my sense of humour is something of an aquired taste & is usually taken the wrong way ;) ), & if you've struggled through my only fanfic (Orophin Dreams of the Waters of Awakening - in the fanfic section), I'm not sure you'd want me involved in an RPG!

[Bêthberry]

Thank you HerenIstarion for providing that link and playing severe auntie. ;) I had PMed a certain person suggesting a link would help but your gracious post was anything but severe.

Ah, davem, I have indeed read your fanfic. The main problem I can see if you and I were to join an RPG together is that we likely could never agree just what our intentions are. My bogan would forever be miswriting your spriggan. And vice versa. ;)

Kransha's post is amazing. To be quite honest, it makes me realise that Meela was on to something about Denethor even though I couldn't understand her way of getting at it. Hmm. I hope that statement is taken the right way. It is meant as a compliment all round. :)

Having said that, I wish to acknowledge a rather unique contribution here. It is not one that most of us could make, but still I think it deserves great mention here: The Barrow Wight's Middle earth Magnets thread. (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=11255) This new game manages to combine several of the best features of our site: humour, playful respect for Tolkien, knowledge of Middle earth, imagination, and just darn good writing. A superb new contribution from the guy who just never runs out of great new ways to make this site interesting. Kudos!

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

I accept being scolded and whipped. Thank you HI for adding the necessary. :)

[Meela]

I hadn't noticed this thread highlighting Denethor until it was mentioned here, and having just read it (and drifted off somewhere through the first post, I must admit. I never was one for complexity.) I thoroughly back it and it's nominations.
It highlights much of what I have already studied, so at least I was more than familiar with the points raised.

[Tulkas the Mighty]

Well it's not from this week, but this one (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?p=327786#post327786) has been one of the most entertaining I've read in a while.

[Feanor of the Peredhil]

Which post did you mean, Tulkas? You linked to the thread, but not the individual post.

Regards,
Feanor

[Tulkas the Mighty]

Sorry. i had thought I linked Lindolirian's post (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=327786&postcount=17) . That should work now. Fordim's was also funny.. Poor guy.

[Bêthberry]

Now why does Lindolirian's post make me think of Frodo sneaking mushrooms from Farmer Maggott's field? " Linfrodolirian" :D

This was, it seems to me, a very busy week on the forum. I haven't kept up with everything--which is a shame as I am sure there are other meritorious posts out there which deserve recognition-- but for now here are several posts which brought more than a wee chuckle to me this week.


Kransha's Hobbit Hooplah (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=358164&postcount=5) contains too many gems to quote here. Who could keep a straight face over the "legendary, elusive and often hunted homo legolasus" or Napoleon Bonaparte as the only French hobbit? It's as good on subsequent reads as on the first. We'll take your two kopecks' worth any week, Kransha.

Then there is Saucey's Lament for Celeborn (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=358218&postcount=804) . I'm sure that these pictures were indeed worth a thousand words and did more for Sauce's argument than any post on the Chapter by Chapter thread could have.

Deserving honourable mention for its proof that a good post need not imitate those of the Canonicity thread or Kalessin's rant is Rimbaud's one sentence reply (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=358278&postcount=18) on the "ONLY the Silmarillion" thread. It almost makes one wish burrahobbit would return also. Nice to have you back, Rim.

There were a great number of worthy posts on the Chapter by Chapter thread this week--Chapter 7, Galadriel's chapter, Book 2. An old nugget, Kalessin's Rant, proved that mining old threads can still bring forth treasures. And our hobbit discovery threads, from Child's serious thread to Lalwendë's mirth thread, were as good as a tankard or two.

I know I've missed threads and posts. Can anyone else suggest other posts they wish to single out for particular merit?

[HerenIstarion]

I second legendary, elusive and often hunted homo legolasus :D. 'To do' list activated.

[Estelyn Telcontar]

I have a new nomination for post of the week - it's appropriate for the season, on-topic for LotR, and very funny besides! To top it off, it's the first post by a new member - what a way to start with a bang! Thanks, Kima Pesan, for Middle Earth Christmas Carols (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?p=365837#post365837)!

[mark12_30]

Unbelievable.

[Amanaduial the archer]

Brilliant!

[HerenIstarion]

It was too big for the Quote of the Day (http://69.51.5.41/showthread.php?t=11548) thread, besides, it was the whole post worth nomination, and more - I doubt it is beatable for quite a while. So here it gets a higher honour (be it week-end or not), for the following is the best post of many weeks!


The Barrow Balrog comes with detachable wings that you can leave on or take off as you prefer. Better yet, buy two so you can have one of each. Invite your friends over and stage battles between the Winged and Non-Winged versions.

And, as a special gift, there is the Action Button Activator/Deactivator Key. Use it to turn the wing motion on or off, giving you total freedom to have a Balrog with wings that work, or wings that are simply for show.

The Barrow Products Post #76 (http://69.51.5.41/showpost.php?p=372701&postcount=76)

[Sophia the Thunder Mistress]

:D How utterly appropriate.

[Encaitare]

I definitely agree with that nomination. Now, where can I buy one? Or two, rather? :D

[Lindolirian]

LMP's Trickster thread (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=11634): his first question and own answer (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=374649&postcount=12) to it were a good read. And of course everyone who posted on it as well.

[HerenIstarion]

with post #32 (http://69.51.5.41/showpost.php?p=377610&postcount=32) of Death of Crystal Heart thread by Child of Seventh Age

I won't spoil it with comments, read for yourselves :D

cheers

[Feanor of the Peredhil]

I would like to nominate Inktomi Slurp Spider's first post (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=377658&postcount=23) for not only being an enigma in itself, as well as hilarious, but for encouraging a highly on-topic and uh... somewhat in depth... discussion.

[Lhunardawen]

mark 12_30 with post #32 of Death of Crystal Heart thread by Child of Seventh Age Oops. I knew I should have done something else aside from repping it. Thanks, HI. :)

[Bêthberry]

Wonderful to see people contributing here, and learning the various ideas and styles each of us appreciates! Helen's post is poignant and Inktomi Slurp Spider is certainly generating curiosity, but I would like to recommend a post here from someone who is long overdue for acknowledgement of fantastic contributions to the Downs.

Behind this post lie many others, week by week, which direct and inspire a very long-term discussion. Each of them could easily be nominated here, but since I'm back this week with my new computer, I have chosen to draw your attention to Estelyn Telcontar's initial post in the Chapter by Chapter thread "Book 3, chapter 11, The Palantir." (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=377148&postcount=1)

What I like in particular about this post is that is raises questions for us to answer about Pippin and provides some context for the use of the poem in this chapter. We seem quickly in the Chapter by Chapter discussion to jump ahead with ideas and connections and less interested in tying in the current thread with what has gone before. Not something wrong by any means, but it is good to have the eagle eye of the Ghosted Princess keeping track of when things were last brought into the story.

Kudos, Estelyn!

[Nimrodel_9]

Can we nominate a whole thread? Me thinks the Death of Crystal Heart thread would win. ;)

I nominate burrahobbit's post in the Death of Crystal Heart thread. http://69.51.5.41/showpost.php?p=377446&postcount=25

It is rather short, but it was so sudden (and shocking) that I later found it hilarious. :)

[Bêthberry]

My dear Nimrodel_9, there is indeed a thread to celebrate Best Thread of the Month (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=11681).

However, one essential criteria is that the thread starter manage it successfully. I wonder if that has happened with The Fate of Crystal Heart thread. :p :rolleyes: ;)

Brevity, thy name is wit, or burra. He rocks, often. And I love him. But Esty still deserves considerable commendation for her work here. Sometimes the size (of a contribution) does matter.

[mark12_30]

Bethberry, Estelyn's faithfulness, thoughtfulness, and stamina is worthy of more honor than any single nomination can give. If only for Esty, there should be another awards ceremony at some point. Alas that I have no organization skills! But for starters, perhaps I shall make it a weekly habit to rep those opening posts.... I haven't seen one yet that wasn't worthy.

[Child of the 7th Age]

Nimrodel_9

Can we nominate a whole thread? Me thinks the Death of Crystal Heart thread would win.

No, you can not nominate the thread. I am the starter of the thread and will not accept a nomination. This situation has never come up before but I am assuming the starter of a thread has the right to decline when he or she feels that a nomination of the thread is little more than an attempt to elicit a laugh at the expense of the people who posted there. I can think of no other reason for nominating that thread.

You might feel differently if you had posted on the original thread. For the past week, my mailbox has been stuffed with notes from people who did post on that thread. A number of these writers were 'philosophical' about what had happened--similar to Mark12_30's excellent post; some were clearly upset by the fact that a poster had unfairly taken advantage of both themselves and others in this way.

We seem to fall into two broad groups: those who find the situation hilarious because they enjoy seeing people duped, and those who feel that there is something wrong when someone tells a lie about death and sits back to laugh at what others say. I'd like to think I'd be in the second group even if I had not started the thread.

Bethberry -

However, one essential criteria is that the thread starter manage it successfully. I wonder if that has happened with The Fate of Crystal Heart thread.

You are correct. I did not manage the thread "successfully". For any interchange or conversation on this site to be "successful", people have to be willing to expose themselves enough to speak with some grain of honesty. This is as true in Mirth as it is in Books. When each of us posts on this site, we do so in the belief that others look at our ideas, whether serious or humorous, as having value. That did not happen here.

I can state with a fair degree of certainty that this situation will never again occur on this site. Moderators and admins will automatically assume that any announcement of serious illness, accident, or death is probably a hoax and will respond with corresponding skepticism. How sad and ironic given the meaning of the books that we are discussing!

[Bêthberry]

Let me step in here immediately with my sincere apologies to Child of the 7th Age. Child certainly knows how to manage a thread successfully. Some of the most successful and informative threads here on the Downs began with Child's thoughts and followed through under her excellent guidance.

When I made the post above stating that the Crystal Heart thread was not worthy of nomination, I was thinking completely in terms of the annoucement from the purported sister of Crystal. I had completely forgotten that Child had started the thread. It was Melissa after all who started things off with her claim about Crystal. That kind of affair certainly has no place in being commemorated for meritorious acclaim.

And I agree wholeheartedly with Child that to offer the event for nomination as best thread is to be completely insensitive to the feelings of those who believe they were taken advantage of. We try to build community here, not create divisions and dischord and bad feelings.

Again, Child, I did not have you in mind. My comments were intended totally towards the perpetrator of the hoax.

[Child of the 7th Age]

Child certainly knows how to manage a thread successfully.

Bethberry -

Well, I don't think I'd go that far :D but thank you for the positive words. I admit I have been known to go fleeing to the far hills when I get in over my head in a literary or philosophical discussion and leave it to others to finish running the gauntlet.

Like you, I am quite sure that there must be better threads to nominate for an honor other than the particular one under discussion.

To return to the topic of this thread, I want to put in another word on behalf of Esty's most recent chapter-by-chapter post. What amazes me is that she seems completely unflappable, at least on this site. No matter what craziness, she responds with calm assurance. Moreover, it's one thing to do book posts when you are in the "right" frame of mind. I often have a way of slipping in and out of the books forum based partly on my schedule and partly on my mood. It is another thing to do these chapter posts week after week no matter what kind of mood you are in. These chapter discussions get off to a much better start because Esty takes the time to think things through and poses a number of questions for us to begin thinking about in our own reading.

Finally, there have been few mentions of RPG posts on this awards thread, but I mean to change that in the coming weeks and give a tip of the hat to a writer or two who has done a gracious or humorous post. My first nod goes to Amanaduial the Archer for her post in the Green Dragon Inn on the continuing sage of the Innkeeper and that rascal Snaveling. She has done such a clever job with this post (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=377890&postcount=1492) by weaving in a number of ongoing subplots and still finding time for a deliciously embarassing moment at the end.

[Bêthberry]

Well, a double nomination from me this week. Here's something to show what standards Middle earth Mirth can achieve:

"A muffin, English or othewise, is still not a patch on a crumpet, really." From the undoubtable Rimbaud on the American Readers (and others) thread (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=379127&postcount=22)

Not to be confused with strumpets, now, mind.

[Bêthberry]

This was posted last week on littlemanpoet's thread, The Emblems of Religion don't belong ... or do they?".

Son of Númenor's distinction between evangelical and eucatastrophic (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=383754&postcount=2)

I like Sono's post for two reasons. It is first of all succinct. And second it relates the question to aspects of Tolkien's own theorising about narrative. Tolkien did not proselytise his faith even while his faith is expressed in his art. Very astute and perceptive, Sono!

[Mithalwen]

There are six types of Troll written by Tolkien: See HERE. Only the Stone trolls encountered by Bilbo and the Dwarves were mentioned to be turned to stone with the sun's light.

I would imagine that if cleverly knocked down, a nice sharp stave/spear could be rammed in between the scales of the troll's hide (An armpit would be good - puncture the lung, and if shoved far enough and at a downward angle, the heart would be pierced). Or one right through the ear hole into the brain would do it. And of course there are always the eyes . . .

~*~ Pio, the bloodthirsty

I wish to nominate this post which probably had a limited audience since it was in response to a query of mine on troll killing on the "Fall of the North" Discussion thread. Partly it was a prompt, helpful and succinct response and partly it revealed an unsuspected dimension to Pio (unsuspected by me at least) :D

[Bêthberry]

Oh, indeed, Mithalwen, those of us who are familiar with pio's past gaming exploits are quite aware of her more recondite forms of knowledge. Why, Mithadan even--but I digress. Well does pio deserve a commendation here for her tireless and prompt help and information gathering for The Shire. She's a gem--our own "Gilmarillion"--and that's for both girl and gamer and gem!

I would like to nominate Helen/Mark 12_30's post (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=386357&postcount=24) from littlemanpoet's thread Smith of Wooton Major in Middle Earth?.

Why? because Helen presents a fascinating observation about the role of trespassing in The Silm and Tolkien's other works. Here's the relevent morsel that tantalises my thoughts:



The word "trespassing" comes to mind. (Remember the salmon swimming into the hot spring at the bottom of the lake? The narrator was out of his element, and you loved it, as I fondly recall.) Smith is essentially trespassing; Frodo is frequently trespassing; by contrast the Sil narrator has every right to be there. So where's the mystery that creates thirst in the soul? I suspect that what moves you is your desire for transcendance-- and that hunger is best whetted by mystery.

Perhaps the Sil creates regret, longing for the good old days, rather than the longing to pierce and percieve a mystery.


She puts her finger on another aspect too, but that's for the telling on lmp's thread.

Lovely observation, Helen!

[Estelyn Telcontar]

I would like to present an extremely hilarious post by Squatter for this category: Could I have a room with a view? (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?p=408817#post408817) on the 'Do Balrogs Have Wings?' thread. He combines friendly banter with his usual classy humour to make a post that has me laughing out loud!

[piosenniel]

Yes, Squatter's post was a delight to read. :) I was especially taken with the cat pictures. :smokin:

~*~ Pio

[Bêthberry]

Although I hesitate to disagree with two--two!--of our illustrious Moderators, I must demur. Clever as Squatter's post is, one other drew from me greater laughs. Allow me to nominate Estelyn own post, The Battle of the Battleship concerning Davossë and HI-wë and Laluinen (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=408470&postcount=277) on the infamous RPG, Revenge of the Entish Bow.

The BarrowDowns hath no higher reputation than this, to be enshrined within the posts of our very own parody. Esty, you slay us.

[Hookbill the Goomba]

I think Crazy captions, despite being very much a one-liner thread has some damned funny posts. My favourite one so far this week has been Éomer's patented melodramatic semi-colon gags (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=408822&postcount=6903) I just thought it was very amusing.

[Bêthberry]

Rimbaud's poetic tour de farce (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=426376&postcount=66) was upstaged in a late-night one-liner by Valesse's Ringing reply (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=426529&postcount=69).

Wham, bam, it's anagram slam this week.

[Bêthberry]

Lush makes a very perceptive observation about Denethor (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=431138&postcount=18) on lmp's thread, What's the worse thing characters had to face in Middle earth/.

Lush's observations speaks to something that I think we haven't much discussed here on the Downs, whether Tolkien (or the story) lends itself to the interpretation that what is needful is personal self-control rather than emotional excess. That contrast can itself be questioned, I realise, but still, Lush's point is I think a fascinating perspective from which to view the man who would fry his child.

Kudos to a very stimulating post. You go, Girl!

[Bêthberry]

The holidays always interrupt my playtime here, so this is a very late entry, but one which by all means ought to be highly recommended as a supreme example of what spending time on the Barrow Downs does to people.

I herebye nominate Abercrombie of Rohan's post with the Barrow Downs Periodic Table (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=433714&postcount=520) as one of the highlights not only of that week, but of that month and the entire year.

And durn it I can't get a small image of the periodic table to work here.

[Amanaduial the archer]

The holidays always interrupt my playtime here, so this is a very late entry, but one which by all means ought to be highly recommended as a supreme example of what spending time on the Barrow Downs does to people.

I herebye nominate Abercrombie of Rohan's post with the Barrow Downs Periodic Table (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=433714&postcount=520) as one of the highlights not only of that week, but of that month and the entire year.

And durn it I can't get a small image of the periodic table to work here. Seconded! Ah, 'tis a terrible thing that the Barrow-Downs obsession can do to people...*shakes head*

[AbercrombieOfRohan]

I'm honoured! Ah, 'tis a terrible thing that the Barrow-Downs obsession can do to people...

And, of course, don't forget an 1 and 1/2 hour Pre-Calculus class... That combination has continually led to disastrous things.