So, Best and Worst Characters?

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

First of all, I wish to apologise for the lame thread title.

Now on to business. Most of us will have been able to see the final extended version of the trilogy. What are your final thoughts as to the questions implied in the title? Which one character do you think was the best in the films overall? And which would you say was the worst?

Vague terms indeed, but take into account all you can. I would say take especial regards to the acting, dialogue, and possible storyline quirks.

Here are my nominations. As to best character, I would argue for Meriadoc Brandybuck. I thought the storytellers found the perfect niche for him, one of my favourite characters in the book. He was never in danger of outshining Frodo and Samwise, the really important Hobbit characters. But he was given enough so that the audience really cared about him. This came to a head with the climax of his story in the Extended version of The Return of the King. The acting was very good, I thought Monaghan had the right look for the part, and I really cannot think of anything wrong that happened with Merry in any of the films. The only complaint I can think of is that he was not featured very much in the first two films, but I think the character was rightly developed a lot overall.

Now worst. It may apear as if I am contradicting myself here because I have been quite the defender of this film character in the past. However, I think that game of Devil's advocate was slightly off-key when faced with the grand picture that stood there glowering at me all that time. That character is Faramir. I thought the acting was weak. Did anyone gauge any strength that the man had? The dialogue was sometimes bad, and dreadful in at least one part; "Saruman attacks from Isengard, Sauron from Mordor..." No kidding, genius. As Avie so brilliantly pointed out on another thread, Faramir played a typical 'damsel-in-distress'. Always weepy-eyed and just weak in general. Think of the part where Madril advises him to forsake Osgiliath. Wenham gives a pitiful cry of order, barely loud enough for anyone to hear him. There was also that whole Frodo and Sam bit which is still highly debatable. Overall, a really poor portrayal of what I think is a golden character.

So, please give me your nominations. Remember to give at least a couple of reasons for why you are choosing the characters. Remember also that this thread is not really the place to argue with others about certain characters.

Maybe it will wind up being just another list topic. Hopefully, it will at least be entertaining to read. A survey of the Barrowdowners, of sorts.

Thanks. :)

[Boromir88]

Don't worry about the lame thread title, atleast it covers the topic. ;)

As for best character...hmm, if it must be from ROTK, then I would say Theoden. I often find myself repeating his lines (his pep-talks in Helm's Deep and on Pelennor fields). I love Bernard Hill, I think he is a wonderful actor, I adored him as the crazy scientist Philos in the below average movie "Scorpion King." Also, as mentioned in another thread, I love the look on his face when he sees this soldier fighting ferociously next to him, little does he know that soldier is Eowyn. Theoden's my favorite character, save Boromir :) .

As for worst, I can't express how much I hate Gothmog. This man that receives one little sentence in the book, gets more screen time then the Witch-king. I hate his lines too "The time of man is over, the time of the orc has come." No it hasn't. Then "Feaaaah, the city is rank with it, eahahaha." His mutilation in the EE even gets me to cringe more.

[King of the North]

Because the answer should be mostly based on dialogue, acting, and possible storyline quirks; my choice for favorite character will be different than that from the book.

Even though not in all three films, Boromir was my favorite character (movies only). Sean Bean portayed the tormented and at the same time valiant character with perfection. None of his lines seemed to be weak or flimsy, but instead left a lasting impression on me. I did not find any flaws in Sean Bean's acting either. The movies show Boromir as more of an evil character than in the books, but that is purely because they are movies. As a result of that, there is much less background information on Boromir which helps define the character to a fuller extent. When I first read the Fellowship of the Ring I did not have a picture perfect understanding of Boromir's nature and appearance. After seeing the movie version, Sean Bean's portrayal fit perfecting into my imagination. Now whenever I read the book, his image appears.

Also quickly I would like to say that if I had to chose from a character that remained in all three movies it would be Meriadoc Brandybuck. Dominick whatever his last name is played the character really well. He also fit perfectly into my vision of Merry from the books. He most definitely outshined the portrayals of Sam and Frodo, who I believe in some parts were poorly played by Sean Astin and Elijah Wood (mostly in the Return of the King).

Lastly I would like to name my least favorite character from the movies. At first I made this decision with a little reluctance, but after reviewing the facts once again it was easy. Legolas was by FAR the worst character in these movies. In the books however, the Sindarin elf was my utmost favorite. Orlando Bloom butchered this beloved character of mine, ESPECIALLY in the amazingly STUPID stunts he pulls in the Two Towers and RotK. If u do not remember, then let me refresh ur memory: In the Two Towers he defies the laws of physics and gravity by lifting himself onto a horse...... well nvm that cant even be explained in words its so impossible, I guess u'd have to see it. Also in RotK he climbs up an Oliphaunt by using arrows (which would easily break, they are basically twigs for God's sake) and then by using the force or something he balances on the back of the beast and shoots the rope holding up the battlement on the Mumak's back. Then (while still keeping perfect balance) walks to its head and shoots it (totally un-accurate, an Oliphaunt has to be shot in the eye to die). As the creature falls to the ground he still amazingly keeps his balance and then ramps off the creatures tentacle thingy in the front (cant remember wat it called) and lands safely. I seriously wanted to throw a hammer at the movie screen after watching that. In the book, Legolas is fairly normal, he's just an elf, so therefore automatically has more wisdom and skill, but the reason he's a hero is because of his skill with a BLADE and a BOW. I had no idea he was supposed to be the Messiah. In the first film, the portrayal is quite good (doesnt even compare to the Legolas in the book though), but later on down the road it worsens quite a bit. Peter Jackson and Orlando Bloom could have easily saved this character if they would have stayed away from the uber lame stunts. I did not have much of a problem with Legolas' appearance in the films, but with the rest of the elves in the movies I did. Please forgive me if I sound homophobic but it makes me have somewhat less respect for them (good thing they normal in books) Answer me this: since wen did all elven men become metro-sexuals that talk very feminitly?

Well I'm done FINALLY. o and btw nice comments Eomer of the Rohirrim.

[Boromir88]

Even though not in all three films, Boromir was my favorite character (movies only). Sean Bean portayed the tormented and at the same time valiant character with perfection.
I agree, I misunderstood, I thought since Eomer was talking about the ROTK EE, person had to be from ROTK (but I'll stay with Theoden). I love Sean Bean in whatever movie he is in (Goldeneye, National Treasure, Lorna Doone, Patriot Games, Troy). I love the scene PJ added with Boromir swordfighting for the hobbits, and they kick him over "for the Shire!," I get a laugh and I think it's some good addition of PJ's. I love when Sean Bean sees the small wooden horse, in Troy, then he sort of looks and rubs his chin like "ahh." Then I can not wait until National Treasure is out to buy, the dialogue between him and Cage are great. They know eachother so well, they complete eachother's sentences, but yet their personalities are totally different. Switching my fond approval now to my grimacing dislike...
Answer me this: since wen did all elven men become metro-sexuals that talk very feminitly?
Good point, Haldir has a bit of an annoying voice, but I like his character in TTT. Despite Elves not being at Helm's Deep, I still like his lines "An alliance once existed between elves and men, we come to honor that allegiance." I find Celeborn's voice to be the most annoying however, atleast he didn't have too many speaking lines. I go into convulsions (I believe that's the word) when I hear, "Tell me where is Gandalf, for I much desire to speak with him?" I can't think it, without being annoyed.

[Finwe-89]

The best character is for me Legolas. I just love Elves. He can be so calm and speaks so softley... I just love it. And he sees evil approtcing when no one else does. Of course I love him too cause he's one of the best archers, but he's, I don't know, I don't know if I have the words to tell. And the WORST character is... NONE, I like all the characters, even all the Orcs. They are all a little piece of a puzzle called Middle-Earth, and that makes them great.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Hmm, already one character with a nomination for Best and Worst. :D

Indeed, I was referring to the trilogy as a whole, and not just the final film. I only mentioned the Extended DVD of The Return of the King because I was talking about Merry, whom I think shone brightest in that film.

[Boromir88]

I'm going to say we are going to see Legolas' name pop up a couple more times, and probably Denethor's name under the "worst."

[Lalwendë]

The films were literally stuffed with good actors so it's very difficult to think of the best one, but this also has the advantage of making the weaker actors stand out. In many cases, where a character was messed about with a little too much (e.g. Faramir), I am prepared to allow for this. In the case of Faramir, I think David Wenham did a decent job with the part he was given; it was wrong, but he did offer up a sensitive portrayal. But I'm not prepared to allow for it in every case. This will sound rather catty but I found Liv Tyler a little wooden in the films. Yes, the role was 'beefed up' and that will colour my opinion, but I found her a little too expressionless. She is a beautiful woman, and seemed at times merely to concentrate on portraying Arwen's beauty; seeing as they did 'up' the role of Arwen, I think she could have put a little more into it. Now you're all free to call me nasty. ;)

However, I was disappointed with much about how the Elves came across - they were almost too ethereal at times. I did not picture Elrond in the manner that he was portrayed in the films, but he did come across as truly powerful, unlike some other Elves I dare not mention. :eek: The best Elven portrayal was Galadriel though - apart from the 'scary moment' she played Galadriel very powerfully.

Its hard to pick a 'best' portrayal. Part of me wants to go for Bilbo because Ian Holm did him so well, and he is my favourite character anyway. I also want to go for Bernard Hill's Theoden as he played him with real gravitas and brought tears to my eyes when he was mourning his son's death. Sean Bean was splendid as ever as Boromir; it seemed a part made for him. And Ian McKellen was an excellent Gandalf. But I think, all in all, my vote would have to go for Christopher Lee as Saruman. He was a character I could not entirely fix on a visualisation for in the books - his image kept 'shifting' (as does his character!) and I saw him more on a 'tjhought' level, as in I saw how his mind was working and heard his voice, but no picture came up. But Chris Lee was perfect. He was sinister, commanding, not a little frightening, and perfectly controlled.

[Mithalwen]

Although I love Christopher Lee, until I watched the EE this morning I thought that he had missed the "seductive" aspect to his voice but he captured it perfectly. I wish they had had more of the "we will have peace scene" - For me the acid test is whether film image has "overwritten" my mental image from the books and radio version. In many cases it has - Boromir, Galadriel, Elrond, , Theoden, Eomer and despite initial misgivingsMerry and Pippin & Aragorn and Eowyn. Gimli, Gandalf are neutrals ..... the cracks of doom scene made me forgive "sam and Frodo" a lot but I reaqlly think they played Frodo to young and Sam too fat... (and for me Ian Holm and Bill Nighy are just perfect in the radio version). However Faramir, Denethor and Arwen ...................... nnnoooooooooooooooooo Faramir - the part was awful rather than the actor and the same with Denethor ... what ever Denethor's mental state I am sure his table manners would not allowed him to slurp his food like that. And Arwen .... too wooden, too trout pouty, too irritating...

[Gurthang]

I agree with Boromir and King of the North.

When I first saw this post, I was thinking Denethor for the worst character. His potrayal was horrible. From the books, I thought him a once kind man who had been driven mad with despair. The movies made him wholly evil. Even in the flashback with Boromir, Faramir and him in Osgiliath, he was a complete jerk! He did have some good lines, but helik a manicdepressant most of the time. You'd turn your head and he'd change from a grieving father to a power-hungry psycho. It was ridiculous.

But after reading King's post, I agree that Legolas is worse. His image was really good in FotR, but was just bad the last two. Seriously, even if the uber-stunts weren't bad enough, he had this whole overplayed I'm-better-than-Gimli-in-everything attitude .

Now, on a better note, I personally thought that Viggo Mortensen did an excellent job playing Aragorn. He at first appeared as a simple ranger who had given up who he might become. But slowly he realized that his path was leading him to a kingship. And as he grasped that role, I thought he really did a good job of taking control of the plot.

BTW, I thought Gimli's character was hilarious in RotK, if somewhat unrealistic.

[Boromir88]

The only thing that gets me from not choosing Denethor, is John Noble's acting. I put aside my own personal view of Denethor (from what I learned from the books) and I just said, John Noble plays a wonderful scum bag. However, I agree with Mith, I think the food shoveling is just over the top. I don't care how evil PJ makes Denethor, it's unnecessary to make the guy a slob too. My view is, I still have my view of Denethor from the books, the movies don't change that, the movies are purely entertainment, and since Noble did such a great performance, and a guy that you too would want to hit with a staff if you had it, then I give a thumbs up to him.

[Tuor of Gondolin]

As has been noted above, there are a remarkable number of good
characters/portrayals in the movies. While Gandalf and Boromir (among others)are well acted and the casting by PJ and friends was good I'd say Eowyn, partly because I had significant doubts that the character could be adequately portrayed in the movies.

The worst must again be mentioned, Denethor!
While not depicted in the book as kindly (ala Theoden) I see him as more
a tragic hero, flawed but dedicated to Gondor, and to some extent, the West as a whole. Although in one of his Letters JRRT takes a surprisingly negative view
of Denethor. His movie bits were awful not just as a one-dimentional "crazy"
but for the ridiculous Gandalf/Denethor interactions. :eek: :mad: :rolleyes:

[Morgul Queen]

Denethor got some of the best lines in the EE *happy sigh* but, as much as I love him, I have to nominate Théoden for best character in the movie. I love the look on his face when he sees Ol' Witchy swoop down towards him, I love his lines, I love his armor and I especially love his sword.

*giggles* But, and I bet you saw this coming a mile off, Legolas for worst. the horrible lines ("A Diversion!" Gee, ya think? *lightbulb*), the stilted acting (Is it too much to ask to have some emotion and variation in his speech? When the extras are better actors than you are something has to be up), that blimmin' scene with the Mumuk, pure cheese there!

*groans*

But to the new Denethor lines I have only one thing to say: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v38/Ainamenelwen/Emotions/applause.gif

[Tigerlily]

For best character I would like to nominate my favoruite, Pippin. I think that there is something special about him. Even though he can be very thaughtless at times (like taking the Palantir). He is a good hobbit. He got a good heart, and would do anything to help his friends. I think Billy Boyd is plays him perfectly, and gives it the right touch of humor. And yes, he can be a big fool at times. But, how can you not love Pippin?


-Tigerlily

[Finwe-89]

I can speak for us all I think: We all love Pippin, he's funny when he's acting foolish, but that's all. I love him, but he's not my fave person. But I think it's cool you love him that much, at last some one else that likes a other person then Legolas, Aragorn, Gandalf, Eomer etc.

[Mithalwen]

I think the trouble with Legolas is that he isn't given a lot of dialogue in the books and a lot of the more profound stuff was discarded becasue it didn't "move the story along" (including just about my favourite lines from the whole book "I count you blessed Gimli son of Gloin")..... so while he gets plenty of fancy stunts his dialogue is limited to stating the obvious giving the illusionm of being "Prince Legolas the Perpetually Confused". In FOTR he seems so surprised by anything he encounters "Orcs!" , "Goblins!" "Crebain!" that I expecteted him to enter Lorien and exclaim "trees!" in complete bewilderment. Then in TTT old eagle eyes either fails to notice or doesn't bother to mention the hoardes of Warg-riders approaching... reducing him to resident pretty boy and "Laurel" to gimli's "Hardy".

I would add that I was very impressed by Karl Urban on looking at the EE ....he was probably the least known and experience of any in a major role and he more than held his own... I was nearly crying when he found Eowyn.....

[Avie]

My favourite (film) character is Gandalf. Ian McKellern just does such a brilliant job of conveying the complexity and depth of the character and even the horrible, jarring duel-with-Saruman scene in FOTR dosen't spoil his performance...gahhhh...what WAS PJ thinking to include that? he might as well have had them play a game of quidditch while he was about it...
Pet peeves include Faramir (O! Pray rescue me from the highest room of the tallest tower...etc etc...), Denethor (He's behind you! ) and and I'm probably gonna get royally flamed for this....Legolas. Easy on the eye but Orlando Bloom is more wooden than an entire Moot of Ents.
I also think that Hugo Weaving was horribly miscast as Elrond. He looks all wrong and his characterisation comes across as sinister and manipulative, for example, not telling Arwen that he had foreseen a son. His motives for doing this are certainly understandable, but I feel it undermines the integrity of the character.

[Boromir88]

Hugo Weaving is a wonderful actor, it's just the characterization that makes him, as well as Elrond look bad. Reminds me too much of Agent Smith. Which, Hugo is the only good actor in those movies. I love the way he talks, its rather computerish, fitting his role perfectly. (atleast in The Matrix).

[Tuor of Gondolin]

Hmm. Makes you wonder whether nine or ten thousand Elronds could have attacked Sauron and destroyed the Ring. :D

[Captain of Despair]

MY least favorite would have to be Denethor. I know it's been mentioned a thousand times, but I cannot get over how they ruined the character. Sure Denethor (in the book) had become somewhat maddened due to everything that had happened (Boromir dying, Faramir becoming ill, terrible visions in the palantir) but over all he was still a good man. In the movies he was portrayed as little more than a raving lunatic. But I digress.

Honorable mention in this category goes to Gimli. He was turned from a great warrior to a bumbling joke. Enough said.

Favorite character is extremely hard to pick, but if I have to choose I will make it a tie between Merry and Pippin. I'm not sure exactly why, but I just love those little guys. The actors and their portrayals were top notch.

[Mithalwen]

Avie ... I adore Hugo Weaving, I have been somewhat in love with him since I was 13 and he was in a miniseries called Bodyline ... so I can only second Boromir's comments about him being a wonderful actor ( for an amazingly intelligent and sensitive performance look at Priscilla...).

However, if you separate the actor from the role I do agree with you in some respects ...in TTT particularly there was a slight "creepy dad" element that I found disturbing. While IMO, just about all the characters were demeaned in some respect by their film treatment ..(Boromir perhaps being an exception being more shown more sympathetically), I think Elrond's character suffered most. In the book he is so noble and puts himself last .. the film makes him rather selfish.

I thought it was quite clever casting .... he has the right colouring and those wonderful eyes, and although I dislike Liv Tyler,it looked plausible that she was his daughter (although he is no where near old enough in reality!), and I reckoned as a Half elf he might show more signs of aging than a full blood... and he looked really good in armour :rolleyes: *thud*.

One thing I will say for the film is that they do seem to have made an effort to make the families have a plausable resemblance although I am surprised they didn't make sean Bean lose the accent that blew the whole thing... but then he kept it even to play Macbeth on stage in London....

[Avie]

Mithalwen, I was not criticising Hugo Weaving's acting which is excellent. My gripe was really with how the scriptwriters interpreted the character of Elrond, making the character appear dismissive of Men..."There is no strengh left in the world of Men", lacking in sympathy for the Hobbits and their longing to go home and dishonest and manipulative with Arwen and Aragorn, the film Elrond falls a long way short of the wise and kindly character of the books.
Having said all that it must have been terribly difficult for PJ&co to get across the essential difference of the Elven characters....I'm sure he made a better job of it than I could have done!
And BTW I agree with you about Sean Bean..."By eck let's slay t'cave troll like"...his accent appears to be ineradicable in whatever role he plays though, to be fair ,he did a decent job of Boromir who I liked better in the film than in the book.

[Neurion]

Answer me this: since wen did all elven men become metro-sexuals that talk very feminitly?I think that the design team probably thought that with being immortal, there would be less of an immediate need to attract a wife or husband and produce children, and thus masculine and feminine attributes are less pronounced as their display is not as important. I still don't like the way they look though.

I think it should be noted, however, that all armored elf warriors who appear on screen are masculine-looking.

[Neurion]

The only thing that gets me from not choosing Denethor, is John Noble's acting. I put aside my own personal view of Denethor (from what I learned from the books) and I just said, John Noble plays a wonderful scum bag. However, I agree with Mith, I think the food shoveling is just over the top. I don't care how evil PJ makes Denethor, it's unnecessary to make the guy a slob too.Actually, I don't think his table manners are that bad by medieval standards.

[Boromir88]

Come on now, I think PJ just has an obsession of slobbish eaters. Take FOTR, with PJ's cameo, bites into a carrot and belches. TTT, Gimli stuffing his face full in Theoden's hall (I seriously doubt a dwarf would do that, especially in a king's hall, oh yeah then Gimli belches). Then ROTK, a steward spitting cherry juice, and chomping while Pippin's singing, highly inappropriate for a steward surely.

[Neurion]

Come on now, I think PJ just has an obsession of slobbish eaters. Take FOTR, with PJ's cameo, bites into a carrot and belches. TTT, Gimli stuffing his face full in Theoden's hall (I seriously doubt a dwarf would do that, especially in a king's hall, oh yeah then Gimli belches). Then ROTK, a steward spitting cherry juice, and chomping while Pippin's singing, highly inappropriate for a steward surely.Three instances do not an obsession make. ;)

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Regarding Elves, I think that they were made to be so beautiful because, well, they are more beautiful than Men in general. Fact.

The femininity is shining through because females are arguably more beautiful than males.

I thought Legolas and Haldir looked really good. There were other aspects of the characters that brought them down, especially dialogue in Leggy's case!

[lucyannalulu]

in all of the lotr movies my favourite character has to be aragorn. normally i would have said Legolas because he is cute but i have gone off him, and viggo mortensen looks so darn cute with his beard and his sword. also my worst character is the king of the dead played by paul norell because he looks so creepy even if he doesnt look like that in real life. i know he is meant to be creepy because he is dead and all but that is just wierd

[Gurthang]

I don't know if this really counts, but here goes.

I thought that Gollum was done very well. Even though he's not a real actor(that we see anyway), he was made out to be the exact creepy, slinky character that I thought he was. He might not have been book-perfect, but he was still very well done. I especially like the fight between Gollum and Smeagol while they're sitting on that rock. The camera pans back and forth like its two people. It might be a little overdramatized, but it really brings out the conflict between the two personalities.

[Lalwendë]

One thing I will say for the film is that they do seem to have made an effort to make the families have a plausable resemblance although I am surprised they didn't make sean Bean lose the accent that blew the whole thing... but then he kept it even to play Macbeth on stage in London....

He does keep his accent seemingly with every part he plays, but I think this stems from a particular 'school' of acting in Britain. If you listen to Bernard Hill, he too retains vestiges of his accent, and they allowed Billy Boyd to use his own accent too. I like this - there is nothing to say what accent various characters might have had, only guidance on pronunciation, and it is entirely feasible that characters might sound slightly different. If they allowed such large regional variations within Hobbits of The Shire, then why should there not be some variation within Gondor. And it did sound good, anyway. ;)

Now, I thought Denethor was eating not cherries, but cherry tomatoes (the work of the devil). I found a lot of the other instances of poor table manners slightly in poor taste, especially where they seem to demean the character of Gimli a bit too much, but when Denethor is seen eating in such a manner I found it underlined his character as portrayed in the films (not his book character), as we see him gorging while his son is sent out to battle needlessly.

As for Gollum, Andy Serkis turned in a vocal performance not to be forgotten, which is all the more brilliant considering that he based it on the sound of a cat coughing. :)

[Mithalwen]

I think Denethor's table mannerswere awful and if they hadn't meant to have been they wouldn't have focussed on them so much. I think they were intended to represent his decline into selfish concerns to the point of madness - greed and decadence in the face of disaster. Book denethor was a noble lord among noble lords, proud and cultured - and to an extent Gondor was a more "civilised" land than Rohan a place of scholars not just soldiers. Such a man would not have eaten like a pig - to eat thus has been poor manners I would say even in a time that did not use cutlery as we do.

As for Sean Bean's accent - I know that Sean Bean is from that generation that didn't have to shed accents to get on (unlike say Edward Petherbridge who came from Yorkshire perhaps 20 years earlier, or the divine voiced George Irving (Meyer in "Holby City" ) who came from South Shields. However, to my mind it is as bizarre as everyone speaking RP to have not got him to clean up the accent when his Australian "father and Brother" spoke accentless English. I didn't mind Pip haveing a different accent since he came from a different part of the shire (tho really Merrry should have had the Celtic tones !) . And by ROTK I had stopped Bernard Hill to say "go on gissa job" and accepted him as Theoden. As far as I recall from articles about the making they had toyed with giving different peoples different accents and I think some of these indecisions seem to have lurked - Eowyn sounding unevenly irish at times and Viggo..... so Lal while I agree about what you say about peoples .... I expected the same family to sound more alike... but then hardly anyone in the Archers sounds like they belong in the Midlands... grr 'cept for when Will was younger with a pet Badger "it will be moider if they kill Stroipey" ....

[Lalwendë]

However, to my mind it is as bizarre as everyone speaking RP to have not got him to clean up the accent when his Australian "father and Brother" spoke accentless English.

Would you say his accent came through so strongly though that it was intrusive? I always thought I only noticed it simply because I'm so used to the accent, and I noticed the long vowels and that kind of thing. By contrast, I'm not used to West Country accents and despite what so many have said, I still can't see much wrong with Sean Astin's accent!

I didn't mind Pip haveing a different accent since he came from a different part of the shire (tho really Merrry should have had the Celtic tones !) .

I agree with you there that Merry ought to have been the one with such a distinctively different accent, although of course both actors were suited to their roles and it wouldn't have 'done' to swap them about.

And by ROTK I had stopped Bernard Hill to say "go on gissa job" and accepted him as Theoden.

That image of Yosser Hughes just does not die though. I've seen Bernard Hill in so many roles but immediately think of him in Boys From the Blackstuff as soon as he comes on screen and it does take a while for that picture to be replaced by whatever role he is now playing! ;)

[Boromir88]

but when Denethor is seen eating in such a manner I found it underlined his character as portrayed in the films (not his book character), as we see him gorging while his son is sent out to battle needlessly.
Lal, if Denethor was the only case of eating slobbishly, I would agree with you. But, as pointed out in one of my previous posts Jackson has a tendancy to do this in each of the movies, making it look like he just put it in there for the heck of it, and nothing to do with showing Denethor's character.

[Finwe-89]

Well, if I need to pick a worst character, then it will be ( of the films ) Denethor, I just hate him! He only showed love to Boromir, but deep in that rocky heart of him, he loved Faramir too

[Boromir88]

Boromir didn't have it quite so easily either. Yes, Denethor did favor him over Faramir, and probably treated him like a loving father should. However, Denethor put a lot of pressure on Boromir to be victorious. Denethor saw Boromir as Gondor's last hope in winning, and put a lot of pressure on Boromir to be a leader of men, and to bring back this "great gift," as Denethor hints at in Minas Tirith. He tells Gandalf "Boromir would have brought it (the ring) back to me." (yes I paraphrased). That's why when Boromir dies, Denethor slips drastically down hill believing all is lost.

[Lalwendë]

Lal, if Denethor was the only case of eating slobbishly, I would agree with you. But, as pointed out in one of my previous posts Jackson has a tendancy to do this in each of the movies, making it look like he just put it in there for the heck of it, and nothing to do with showing Denethor's character.

I'll give you that one then - taken in context with the rest of such instances in the films, I can see that Denethor's eating habits might look undignified! It's interesting though, how these touches of crude humour made it into the films - after all, PJ did make zombie films; I suppose we ought to be grateful none of the Orcs were seen wielding Flymos. ;)

[SamwiseGamgee]

Favourite character is a toughie. There are quite a few who would make it onto my shortlist. I think overall though, I'd have to go for Theoden. I was so terrified that they were going to leave the Ride of the Rohirrim out of the film and when they came to it and then Bernard Hill delivered it as beautifully as he did it was one of the highlights of the trilogy. I also felt that Hill really captured that recovery from his ensnarement by Saruman well- in particular the scene where he says: 'It is a cruel fate that any parent should live to see their child's funeral.' (para.). I also felt that he encapsulated that sense of satisfied achievement in his death speech to Eowyn particularly well, as though he felt he had finally righted the wrongs and died for a noble cause.
Now, my worst character. I'm afraid this is a not-too-shortlist. :rolleyes: I'm going to have to just come out and say that it's Elrond, though. There are just too many things which I feel aren't right about him. Firstly, and I'm going to get this out of the way and not mention it any further, I don't think he's beautiful enough to be an elf. Secondly, there's the way he plays the father. Sure, there are the times when he looks after Arwen in TTT and the look as he nods for her to approach Aragorn in Minas Tirith in ROTK, but overall I just found him a sly, manipulative, low-down double-crossin' varmit! Ahem. No, but seriously, I found him to be very manipulative. And then finally there was the snobbishness that I just didn't get a sense of in the books. In the films he seems dismissive of Frodo's chances as well as those of man, and overconfident in his own gift of foresight. I really thought that missed the mark for Elrond, and it didn't impress me at all.
Ok then, there you are... now let me have it! :(

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

...the best character is Theoden.

...the worst characters are Legolas and Denethor.


If you haven't voted, please do. Let's try and make this more representative of the Downers.

[Numenorean]

Ok Eomer, best, well it’s a close one between Treebeard, I love his line (amongst others): “My business is with Isengard tonight!…” and Éowyn. I guess the Shieldmaiden shades it on account of the fact that she does have more of a spiritual and physical journey across the films, and I feel that Miranda captures her Rohirric passion and humanity almost perfectly.
Worst, hmmm, it’s a close call between a few: Denethor, and eyeball Sauron were annoying and weak, but none more so in my mind than Gothmog the pigsy Orc, I still wince at his 80s horror make-up and laughable attempts at intimidation. :D

[the phantom]

Bilbo was great, as was Boromir, Gandalf, and Gimli. I'll probably have to go with Boromir as the best since he's one of my favorite book characters. Sean Bean did an awesome job.

I didn't particularly like Faramir, Elrond, Arwen, and Galadriel. I think that Wenham did a great job with the part that he was given, but his part stunk. They should've stuck with the book on Faramir.

They also strayed too far from the book with Arwen. Movie Arwen wasn't the real Arwen, plus I agree with Lalwende that Liv was wooden and expressionless. The only thing she had going for her was first rate looks.

Elrond was also different from the books (and in most cases "different from the books" translates to "worse than the books"). He was mean, stubborn, and irritable in the movie. There was almost zero warmth, except at the end when he came to Minas Tirith and then he just looked cheesy.

My main beef with Galadriel was her looks. Galadriel was supposed to be tied with Arwen for the most beautiful living being in all of Middle-Earth. She sure didn't look it. Cate's a good actress and all, but they should've cast somebody more stunning for Galadriel.

So, who's the worst? Elrond narrowly beats out his daughter, Arwen, probably because I didn't expect much of Arwen, where as Elrond I expected an awful lot out of because he's my favorite character in Lord of the Rings. I was very disappointed.

It's not Hugo's fault though. He did what he was told. I blame this one on PJ.

[Linnahiril Tinnufinwen]

My favorite character, both in the books and the movies, has been and always will be Samwise Gamgee. He is such a wonderfully simplistic, honest, devoted Hobbit. Sean Astin did a great job in portraying him, and I think he was one of the better actors in the film.

My least favorite character would have to be Gollum. I understand that most of his evil greed came from the corruption the ring instilled in him, but he still struck me as an ugly, nasty, coniving little thing. Perhaps I'm too little sympathetic, but I can't help it. I truly don't like him, although he might is one of those characters that you are meant not to like.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

I understand you wouldn't like to invite Gollum over for dinner, but that's not really the question. Did you think the character was inadequately portrayed in the film?

[Linnahiril Tinnufinwen]

I apologize. I must have misunderstood the question at first. But to answer your question, I think Gollum was excellently portrayed in the movies. Andy Serkis truly brought the character to life in so many more ways than just the voice. He was perfectly cast, in my opinion.

My least favorite character, then, would have to be Aragorn. A lot of people would probably disagree with me, but I didn't think Viggo Mortenson had the kind of power and kingliness that I expected Aragorn to have. Don't get me wrong; I think Mortenson is a decent actor, and that his sword fights were cool, but he didn't have the comand that the King of Gondor and Arnor ought to have had. But then, that is just my opinion.

[Morquen]

My favourite character would definitely have to be Elrond... but only for his eyes. To me hugu only really got elronds character in the council of elrond and he seemed a little too emotional in other parts of the movie.

Orlando, for me, portrayed legolas terribly! He exaggerated his abilities too much and he only said things like " a shadow and a threat has been growing on my mind...", " 44, 45, 46, 47...62, 63, 64... how many gimli?! etc." and re-stating the obvious. He's my choice for worst character... and eowyn, she has funny expressions and is whiney... it's only my opinion... ;)

Karl urban really got eomer's character and give him lots of credit. he was really good at his reactions and made a really convincing rohirrim... he's my pick for best character

[Tuor of Gondolin]

While Linnahiril Tinnufinwen makes a good point about movie Aragorn's lack of
"gravitas", I think that's largely a fault of PJ and friends rewriting the character,
especially trying to make him a sort of Hamletish reluctant actor, as opposed to
book Aragorn. Viggo could probably have adequately portrayed book Aragorn.
But I still hold movie Denethor as worst portrayal, both from changes in the
book and a failure to show subtleties in his character and its deterioration.
Remember, Denethor had substantial reasons for not being a fan of Aragorn,
starting from Denethor's youth and Aragorn's (unwitting) competition for
Denethor's father's affections.

[aelithes]

Favourite Character - I will have to second an earlier motion and go with Gandalf. Despite the fact that he's a bit different to the Gandalf of the book, I simply love Ian McKellen's portrayal of both Gandalf the Grey and the White (I think he created two different versions of the same character brilliantly). His description of what happens after death ('the grey ring curtain rolls back... and all turns to silver glass') to Pippin in Minas Tirith is magnificent. If there was anyone who deserved an Oscar nomination for best supporting actor, he (or Sean Astin) would have been it.

Least Favourite Character - Legolas and Elrond. Orlando Bloom, though I do like him (to look at), ruined the character for me. I liked him fine in FOTR, but my opinion about him sadly only declined continually from there. I did, however, like his physical acting, and he made battle scenes quite entertaining.

Elrond - I know everyone says this, but every single time Hugo Weaving opened his mouth, I half-expected 'Mister Ander' to come out. Furthermore, he seemed to be adamantly and emphatically ****ed off all the time... it was that undiminishing scowl that really annoyed me. Like when Arwen is leaving Rivendell by night, and we see the shot of Elrond watching her go, he's scrunching up his face and looking like he's about ready to throw a conniption fit. Certainly not the mature, commanding presence that I imagined while reading the book.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Bringin' it back. This is because my views have drastically changed in recent times, and I will explain how soon.

But perhaps other, fresher Downers will have their thoughts to add? Go on, you know you want to.

[Macalaure]

You asked for it. ;)

I can't resist to not just tell you my good and bad, but to evaluate all imortant characters.

I found it quite difficult to do that. Sometimes the filmmaker casted a very good and fitting actor, but then screwed up the script and ruined it (Pippin, Gimli). Then they casted a fitting actor who cannot act (Celeborn). Or they casted a good actor who doesn't fit in. And then they screwed up the script, too - out of habit (Frodo, Elrond).

So I gave everybody three categories:
Casting: Does the actor look like he should? Does he coincide with the book description?
Acting: Is he convincing? Does he act good or bad?
Writing: Do the writers keep with the book characters or do they change it? And if they do, does the character benefit or not?


Here we go.


Frodo C-

Casting: He simply isn't Frodo, is he? At least he looks like a halfling, so it could have been worse. D

Acting: Not that convincing, but I can't point out anything particularly bad now. B

Writing: The effect of the Ring is way to big. His attitude towards Sam is poor through TTT and half through RotK. The writers made him too much of a victim. D


Gandalf A-

C: A brilliant Gandalf the Grey but less convincing to me as the White. A-

A: Hey, it's Ian McKellen... A

W: I don't like the Witch-King scene and his role in the Last Debate, but that's about it. B


Bilbo A

C: One of the best choices of the whole film. A

A: Nothing to complain about. A

W: The quick aging bugs a little. A-


Sam A-

C: Nothing to complain about. A

A: I think Astin's acting decreases a bit at the end, but still: B

W: Many changes were done to Frodo, but Sam reacts to them as the real Sam would have. A-


Merry C-

C: They could have picked worse. B-

A: You can see that Monaghan is not that gifted an actor, but still: C-

W: Except for one scene during the Ride of the Rohirrim, he's portayed as a child. It's simply not Merry, but somebody else. D-


Pippin B-

C: He's the oldest of the four hobbit actors, so he actually fits in age. A-

A: Pippin bugs, but it's not Boyd's fault. B

W: Most annoying in the first two (too childish, just for instance), but gathering ground in RotK. D


Aragorn C+

C: A great Strider, but a horrible Elessar. Where's the kingliness? C+

A: The lack of kingliness is not Mortensen's fault. I guess he acted just like he was told to. B

W: He remains the scruffy ranger throughout the movies, he's close to usurping power in Rohan and I still can't believe he cuts the Mouth of Sauron. D


Saruman B-

C: I think it was alatar who pointed that out: Saruman looks dirtier than one expected him to. B+

A: Solid, I would say. B

W: In FotR he's captured well. In TTT we are made believe he's a mere puppet of Sauron. The short appearance in RotK was very uninspired. C


Arwen C

C: I still think she looks beautiful and otherworldly enough. B+

A: I guess it simply takes more than an average actress to play an elf. C-

W: First she's an amazon, then she leaves Aragorn for the Havens on Elrond's word. I understand she had to be given more screen time, but was it impossible to fill that time with something that makes sense? D-


Elrond C

C: Hugo Weaving may be otherworldly enough, but beautiful? He's surely not the way I imagine him. D

A: Again, I can't point out what it is exactly, but he fails to convince me. Yet, being Hugo Weaving, his acting is nothing to complain about. B

W: A true descendant of Thingol, isn't he? Elrond the statesman is captured quite well, but the private person? Not really. D+


Boromir A

C: Though Sean Bean doesn't look like book-Boromir to me, there is something Boromirish about him. B+ (A if he had worn a black wig)

A: No complaints. A

W: Surely you could argue that a sympathetic Boromir just isn't a true Boromir, but without changing the character significantly the writers were able to add a lot of depth to him and made him accessible and identifiable with. A+


Legolas D+

C: Orlando Bloom simply is too smooth a face. C+

A: See Arwen. C-

W: I can live with Legolas being a super-hero. What I cannot live with is his shallowness. Where's his fine humour? They cut every single sentence that made Legolas a two-dimensional character in the book. Now we're down to one. E+


Gimli C+

C: No complaints. A

A: Under all that plastics, acting cannot be easy. Yet he was convincing to me. B

W: Let's just say that it's the scene with Galadriel that prevented an F. E


Galadriel A

C: Since I'm preoccupied with a heavy crush on Cate Blanchett, I cannot give an objective grade. I think she looked awesome. A+

A: If you take a great actress, you get a great elf. A

W: She was slightly darker than in the book, but I liked that. A


Celeborn D+

C: They could have picked worse. C

A:
- Peter Jackson: "Marton, Celeborn means Silver-Tree. So that is what your acting should be like."
- Marton Csokas: "OK."
- Macalaure: "E"

W: There's few you can do wrong with Celeborn. The one would be making him look like being second in power to Galadriel. C-


Haldir D+

C: I think he looked alright. B

A: Good actor: good elf. Average actor: bad elf. Below-average actor: oh, dear. D-

W: The scenes in Lórien were alright. The scenes in Rohan were superfluous. At least they tried to make it realistic. D-


Gollum A-

C: Serkis was great, as were the special effects. A

A: See point one above. A

W: The two sides of Gollum are made very clear, which is both interesting to see, as well as a bit disappointing, since he loses a bit of his scariness. B+


Treebeard C-

C: The effects were good, but not overwhelming (his eyes disappointed me). B-

W: The role was quite dumbed-down, as were all ents. The ent-moot was horrible. D-


Éomer B+

C: No complaints. A

A: Just like Monaghan, Urban is not the most gifted actor. But he acts well enough. It was a role made for him. B-

W: Not having him at Helm's Deep was disappointing as this is where we get to know him in the book. The scenes we see of him before he meets the three hunters were very good on the other hand. B-


Théoden B+

C: Not quite as I imagine him, but definitely not too shabby. B

A: He's good, but not a straight A. A-

W: He almost lets Aragorn usurp his throne. That shouldn't be. And deciding to hide in Helm's Deep was very out-of-character. But the burial of Théodred was great. B-



Éowyn A-

C: She could have been younger to me, but was perfect in all other respects - at least to me. A-

A: See Théoden. A-

W: She treats Merry like a child. But then, of course, Merry behaves like one. Her relationship to Faramir lacked about everything. Her scenes with Gríma were great. B+


Gríma A-

C: He should look like a man of Rohan, but doesn't. B-

A: Dourif makes the best out of the few scenes he has. A

W: His hold over Théoden is far too strong. But the writers very well showed his wits, and I love the tear he cries when he sees the Uruk-hai army. A


Faramir C

C: Sean Bean doesn't look like Boromir and David Wenham doesn't look like Faramir. The problem is, that, to me, Wenham doesn't have much Faramirish in him. I would say he was miscasted. D

A: Yet, he does a solid job in the acting. B

W: I share the opinion that the writers did not change Faramir that much. He only reacted to the changed Frodo like book-Faramir maybe would have. In RotK we get "our" Faramir back. Still he looks more like a victim to his father and his relationship to Éowyn lacked it all. C


Denethor D-

C: He looks older than Denethor should look. In the book he tells us that he can still wield the sword. If he said it in the movie, we wouldn't have believed him. Isn't it ironic, that John Noble looks less noble than he should have? C-

A: The budget of the movies must have run out just when it came to Noble's elvish lessons. Does he get a name right at all? Also, his acting looked very unmotivated to me. D-

W: They could have done it so much better if they only showed Denethor looking into the Palantír. We aren't told about the cause of his madness, which also undergoes less development than in the book since Denethor is already quite mad in the beginning. E


Nazgûl C+

The Ringwraiths were great in FotR, I think. But they were too unscary in RotK. They flew over Minas Tirith with nobody bothering to shoot them. The Witch-King almost defeats Gandalf. Instead of seeing his crown and eyes we get a ridiculous-looking helmet. And we don't get to see one at Cirith Ungol.


Orcs C

Lurtz was a great addition. The roles of Uglúk and Grishnákh were severely cut, much to Grishnákh's detriment. Cannibalistic orcs!? Sad they cut most of the talk between Shagrat and Gorbag. Gothmog and the orc overseer at Isenmouthe were both bad and unnecessary. Below the line, they were as bad and unsympathetic as they should have, but lacked depth. But many things lacked depth.


Imrahil F

C: How could this have happened? They seem to have forgotten to cast an actor for him! There was too much money in this project for such amateur faults. Unexcusable. F :p

W: Seriously now. Yes, many characters were cut from the book and maybe it's a matter of taste who the worst omission is. To me it's Imrahil, the model Gondorian, since Faramir is out for most of the RotK and Aragorn is (well, should be that is) a bit untouchable.

[ninja91]

The best character in it was Sam. If not for him, Frodo would have surely died from dehydration, tire, and lack of everything needed to survive. He possibly would have been murdered by Gollum before he reached the Cracks of Doom. (which if Sam wasnt there Frodo would not have reached)
The worst was Denethor. They turned him into a loathful, selfish, cowardly steward, but really (in the books) he was lost and could not make all the right decisions. In the books, Denethor was not a bad person, he just didnt have a good attitude and he definitely had lost all hope.
Just while we are on the subject, I really liked how they had the Mouth of Sauron. In my opinion, the scene with him in the books is one of the most important happenings in the story. They made the Mouth of Sauron truly fearsome, and somewhat mysterious. I just didnt like how Aragorn sliced off his head.

[ArathorofBarahir]

I honestly can't pick a worst character, for me some are better than others, but there is no bad character in the Lord of the Rings. I however enjoy and appreciate some characters better than others. Aragorn has to rank up their as my all time favorite. He is everything I wish I could be, selfless, courageous, honrable, noble and knows what must be done to protect Middle Earth. I also enjoy Boromir, proud, noble and a man of his people. Now, some of you are going to hate me for this, but I enjoy Faramir, in the books and in the movies. I think he is selfless, and is a moral and honest man. He is brave, and courageous, but he shows in a more intelligent way than his brother. Gandalf is another favorite, wise, intelligent and very strong, willing to protect Middle Earth with ever fiber of their being. And finally I loved the hobbits. The four main ones. I identify the most with Frodo, in the fact that he selflessly took the up the burden of being a Ring bearer and selflessly did it to save the Shire, but not for himself, but for the generations to come. Samwise Gamgee is probably the first character that comes to mind when I think of or mention hobbits. He's down to earth and very loving. But when what he hold's dear and cares about is threatened he will do just about anything to protect it. Merry and Pippin are great, just because of the way seemed so carefree in the beginning of the movies, and book (sort of) and then went through changes and matured, yet still maintained that hobbit sense (seen in the end of the TTT EE and the beginning of ROTK).

[Rikae]

For the best movie character, I'll second the vote for Gollum - who, incidentally, is a real actor and I'll bite anyone who says otherwise. Everything that's great about him - the way he moves, the way he says his lines, the expressions on his face, it's all Andy Serkis. WETA just did the costume & makeup, as far as I'm concerned. (OK, and the changing pupils, but that's insignificant). My favorite because of the way he is at once threatening, pitiful and humorous. I love the timing in the way Andy says the lines, the voice, everything ... the most memorable character in the movies by far.
My least favorite in the movies is my favorite in the books: Aragorn. Viggo's a decent actor, but he just can't fill Aragorn's shoes. He's too casual, and he lacks the mystery and potential danger implied in first two books and the nobility of Aragorn in the third book. There just isn't enough depth or intensity. Besides, I always pictured Aragorn with stubble, rather than a goatee. :p

[Elladan and Elrohir]

Just because he's my favorite character from the books, I'll give my vote to a character who, as far as I can see, hasn't yet received a single vote for Favorite: Frodo Baggins.

"How in the world?" you protest. "They picked an eighteen-year-old kid to play him, he does nothing but look scared in FOTR, he leaves Sam behind in ROTK, how do you still like the movie version of Frodo?"
Not quite sure. It's a very different Frodo than the one in the book, but it works -- largely because of Elijah Wood's acting. You can say what you want about the material, but I'm gonna get seriously mad if you dispute the fact that the "kid" can straight-up ACT.

Macalaure, wonderful idea to rate all the characters. Problem for me is that I can't find much to be critical about. I just can't bash these characters very well, for some reason. The acting is the best top-to-bottom that I have ever seen in any movie, anywhere. And I've gotten so used to thinking of the actors as the characters that I don't even question the casting choices.

[Lush]

Best: Gandalf, because Ian McKellen has the right combination of gravitas and compassion. Legolas, because despite the bright blond wig, Orlando Bloom is amazingly charming and, if you can believe it, subtle. I don't just love looking at him, I love watching him in action. Aragorn, for me, is exceptional in the first film. The other two he's great about half the time.

Worst: Frodo, because the role had so much potential, but seemed to steadily deteriorate for me from the beginning of the first film until the the end of the last film. I don't think this is Elijah Wood's fault at all, and consider him a fine actor. I think he did really well with the material he was given. I just think they exaggerated the role up too much - he just stares at the camera with those tragic blue eyes of his for what seems like to be hours. I blame this on poor directing, honestly. They made him do the same thing over and over again, and although he did it well, it didn't work for me in the larger context. I really appreciated it when, at the very end, he's seen back home in the Shire, and his face looks calm. Sad, but calm. It made all the difference.

Also, there is Haldir to consider. What's up with the bad weave? And don't even get me started on the way they had him move and talk...

P.S. Oh, and I love Gollum. Doh.

[CSteefel]

MY least favorite would have to be Denethor. I know it's been mentioned a thousand times, but I cannot get over how they ruined the character. Sure Denethor (in the book) had become somewhat maddened due to everything that had happened (Boromir dying, Faramir becoming ill, terrible visions in the palantir) but over all he was still a good man. In the movies he was portrayed as little more than a raving lunatic. But I digress.

I just re-read this section in the book and I did not find the book version all that flattering as to Denethor's character either, at least at the end. Many of his lines are taken verbatim from the book.

However, I do agree that the scene where he congratulates Boromir on his recapture of Osgiliath portrays Denethor in a bad, even nasty light, and that this is absent in the book.

[Trotter]

I agree with most of you. But, like it has been said, I do not think that any of the actors are to blame, it is PJ and his writing team that ARE. Now, after seeing both LOTR and KONG, I believe that old Pete is not that fine of a director as far as actors go. I do think that he is good at directing movement and action though, but 'action scenes do not a Lord of the Rings make.'

[Servant of Shadows]

I see that all of you have forgotten about one of the most powerful people in all of Middle-Earth, Tom Bombadil. Now before someone goes off saying who the (insert word here) is Tom Bombadil, I say that you have little knowledge of the series beyond the movies. Tom is one of the most powerful because he is one of the few that has no temptations for the Ring of Power. When he wears the ring, he does NOT turn invisible, and when Frodo puts the ring on Tom can still see him.
I think they made a poor mistake not to put Tom Bombadil into the movie because he is, in my opinion, near the power of Galadrial and Sauron.

My least favorite character would have to be..Sauron himself, In the movies ((Fellowship-King)) You only see him ONCE as his trueself, in which the scene where he dies, they could have made a whole movie out of the things he had done, and while they were all talking about how EVIL Sauron was, they forget about Melkor. Melkor is more powerful then Sauron in every way. When Sauron is a giant floating eye, he just looks around..doing nothing but commanding troops like its a video game!

[Trotter]

had I see that all of you have forgotten about one of the most powerful people in all of Middle-Earth, Tom Bombadil. Now before someone goes off saying who the (insert word here) is Tom Bombadil, I say that you have little knowledge of the series beyond the movies. Tom is one of the most powerful because he is one of the few that has no temptations for the Ring of Power. When he wears the ring, he does NOT turn invisible, and when Frodo puts the ring on Tom can still see him.
I think they made a poor mistake not to put Tom Bombadil into the movie because he is, in my opinion, near the power of Galadrial and Sauron.



Yes, but to put Tom in a movie one would have to deviate from the course of the plot quite a bit, which audiences wouldn't go for. In a film one must remain focused upon the main flow of the story. Really, the cutting of Tom is a change that I have no problem with, though he is a likable character, it was just one of those things that had to be done. Sure, if he had been put in, us LOTR diehards would have cheered but not so with most other movie-goers.

[ArathorofBarahir]

Worst Character? I don't think any of the characters in the movies were bad, there were just a few that I didn't like. I didn't like Wormtongue or Gothmog and Gamling just poorly done.

Best Characters? Aragorn! Hands down. He was my favorite character from the books and so he was my favorite character from the movies. I loved the way he fought in the movies, his lines and his appearance.

Next I would have to choose Faramir. I can see why they changed him from the book. It made him a little less noble and little more human. I also liked his lines, especially the "Brave Deeds should no be checked with cold counsel," line from the ROTK EE.

After this I'd pick Eomer, I think he was masterfully portrayed and his costume and lines were great.

The four hobbits, I have a soft spot for hobbits. Because I think that's how I would see myself if I were to be in Middle Earth. I think Sam was amazing, the speech at the end of TTT was great, his carrying Frodo up the slope of Mount Doom was just awesome. Frodo was amazing as well, I liked how his deterioration was portrayed. Merry and Pippin were absolutely awesome, especially in Fangorn and at the Entmoot, not to mention their snippets of comedy.


All the other characters were good too, these ones were my favorites