View Full Version : Lord of the Rings (The Movies) in one word.
Boromir88
11-06-2006, 10:49 AM
To take from Fordim's idea (I hope he didn't copyright that?) Here is now a thread to post one word describing the movies.
The same rules still apply from Fordim's thread (one post, one word...no continuous chain posts of one word describing the movies...etc). Positive and Negative words describing the movies are allowed, (but no arguing/championing your choice of one word).
To start out...perhaps the most obvious:
Trilogy
The Saucepan Man
11-06-2006, 11:22 AM
Spectacular
Eomer of the Rohirrim
11-06-2006, 11:24 AM
Dominating
Bęthberry
11-06-2006, 12:14 PM
spectacle ;)
Boromir88
11-06-2006, 12:20 PM
Scenic
Bęthberry
11-06-2006, 12:22 PM
seen
:D
The Saucepan Man
11-06-2006, 12:27 PM
The Saucepan Man: Engrossing
Bęthberry: High-grossing
or, simply ...
Bęthberry: Gross
:p ;)
Nogrod
11-06-2006, 12:31 PM
Juvenile = beautiful but shallow, lacking depth but championing in intensity... :rolleyes:
mormegil
11-06-2006, 12:41 PM
Exciting
Fordim Hedgethistle
11-06-2006, 01:00 PM
Loud
Essex
11-06-2006, 01:15 PM
Masterpiece
Anguirel
11-06-2006, 01:19 PM
Flawed
Folwren
11-06-2006, 01:25 PM
Mistaken
Lalwendë
11-06-2006, 04:14 PM
Controversial.
Brinniel
11-06-2006, 04:49 PM
Unprecedented
Gil-Galad
11-06-2006, 06:17 PM
Unique
Lalwendë
11-07-2006, 02:01 AM
Merchandising
Gil-Galad
11-07-2006, 05:23 PM
Merchandising
sorry, but now i can't stop thinking of Lord of the Ring's brand Flamethrowers...
mormegil
11-07-2006, 05:41 PM
Epic
Bęthberry
11-07-2006, 05:44 PM
SaucepanMan: panoramic
Bethberry: panned
:p ;)
ninja91
11-07-2006, 06:41 PM
Magnificent
Thinlómien
11-08-2006, 02:11 AM
pancake
doug*platypus
11-12-2006, 09:33 PM
arrogant
arcticstorm
11-12-2006, 10:22 PM
revolutionary
alatar
11-30-2006, 10:44 AM
f(x) = cos(x), where x is positive.
ninja91
11-30-2006, 10:45 AM
deliciously scrumptiously tasty.
Tuor in Gondolin
12-01-2006, 09:13 AM
Erratic.
Aaron
12-05-2006, 01:46 PM
Ingrattitude. (I won't name names)
alatar
12-05-2006, 02:01 PM
Ingrattitude. (I won't name names)
You don't have too; everyone already knows...;)
By the by, Aaron, Welcome to the Downs.
Aaron
12-05-2006, 03:09 PM
And thank you for being the first person to actually welcome me. ;)
Beleg Cuthalion
12-05-2006, 03:27 PM
Short
Boromir88
12-05-2006, 03:44 PM
Short~Beleg
Haha, I like that one. :p
how about...simplistic?
And thank you for being the first person to actually welcome me.~Aaron
Is the 2nd person that welcomes you just as important as the first? :p ...Just kidding, welcome to the 'downs.
Delicious (or, as the case may be, delushious). :D
Rikae
12-05-2006, 05:18 PM
Satisfying
Beleg Cuthalion
12-05-2006, 07:25 PM
Haha, I like that one. :p
how about...simplistic?
Is the 2nd person that welcomes you just as important as the first? :p ...Just kidding, welcome to the 'downs.
Thanks. :smokin: How about Puissant
And let me be the third guy to welcome Anron (third times the charm, or so they say)
alatar
12-05-2006, 09:50 PM
Ingrattitude. (I won't name names)
So now that you've been welcomed thrice, I guess that it's safe to ask the meaning of your 'one word.' ;) You could answer here or in another thread, as desired.
High King Fingolfin
12-06-2006, 04:10 AM
Unprecedented
Originally posted by Gil-Galad
sorry, but now i can't stop thinking of Lord of the Ring's brand Flamethrowers...
Denethor's favorite. :D
Reg Pither
12-06-2006, 05:15 AM
Misguided :(
Aaron
12-06-2006, 05:47 AM
So now that you've been welcomed thrice, I guess that it's safe to ask the meaning of your 'one word.' ;) You could answer here or in another thread, as desired.
I shall answer here and once more thank you all for the kind welcome :)
The way I see it Peter Jackson made my favourite book into a spectacular and thought provoking movie, the greatest movie of all time in my view, he worked for many years and sacrificed much but eventually the movies got made.
Unfortunately some were not satisfied were they? Where was Bombadil? Why did Faramir not act as he did in the book? Why did Frodo enter Shelob's Lair alone? Now, I do not wish to disregard these concerns but many of said concerns have been stated in a snide and holier-than-thou manner which I can not accept.
Wasn't it enough that the movies were made? That the cast and crew spent so much time and effort trying to please us?
Does that mean nothing?
And so, when I think of the movies I always think of the word "ingrattitude".
Again, I'm not naming names and I trust you all to draw your own conclusions.
The Saucepan Man
12-06-2006, 08:12 AM
Aaron
You might be interested in this old thread, which I started shortly after watching TTT because I found myself rather taken aback by what I considered to be some rather extreme reactions to the films:
Why all the anger? (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=9334&page=1&pp=40)
It's rather hard going at first, I am afraid, because of the changes in the site's formatting since it was first started, but it's worth a look. While "anger" is perhaps an overstatement of what many people felt, many certainly felt disappointment and dismay at the films and they provide insightful explanations in that thread of why they felt like this.
For many, I think, the the character alterations and simplification that were necessary (in my view) to bring these films to a mass audience in some way mar something (the book or particular aspects of it) that they hold dear. And this, I think is understandable, given how special the book is to most here. There is also regret at "what could have been".
For myself, while I share some of the concerns expressed about the films and do find myself getting irritated by internal inconsistencies and continuity issues, I still think that as films they are exceptional examples of their genre. And while the book remains very dear to me, I do not feel the same disappointment and dismay as many others because I hold the films as separate from the book. The characters and the events portrayed are slightly different and so, in my view, do not "change" or "mar" or affect in any way the story that Tolkien wrote or my feelings about it. The films provide an approximation, not a reproduction, of the story told by Tolkien, and I am able to enjoy them as such.
Oh, and welcome to the Downs, by the way. :D
the phantom
12-06-2006, 08:39 AM
almost
Bęthberry
12-06-2006, 08:43 AM
Wasn't it enough that the movies were made? That the cast and crew spent so much time and effort trying to please us?
Does that mean nothing?
And so, when I think of the movies I always think of the word "ingrattitude".
Again, I'm not naming names and I trust you all to draw your own conclusions.
Oh how silly of us! Here we thought New Line and Paramount and PJ et al were just making a commercial film to earn some income and make a profit but really they were simply thinking of us and our tastes and values all along and we just couldn't see that. How positively unfair of us to have critical tastes that they didn't address.
Well, not to get off topic, I shall welcome you, Aaron, over on the welcoming thread in N & N. ;) And now for a new word about those who sponsor our pleasure:
burlesque :D
alatar
12-06-2006, 09:17 AM
Now, I do not wish to disregard these concerns but many of said concerns have been stated in a snide and holier-than-thou manner which I can not accept.
But I do 'snide' so well...;)
You can read my thoughts regarding the entire movie trilogy in the Sequence by Sequence (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43) part of this forum. Of particular note is the thread LotR3-RotK-Seq15 (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=13443) thread, which, at the bottom, explains why I'm here.
Also, note that I've made many favorable comments (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showpost.php?p=450917&postcount=25) about Peter Jackson's work, but, being a picker of bones, I've tried to limit those moments to thrice a year.
The Might
01-02-2007, 02:27 PM
special ;)
Liriodendron
01-02-2007, 10:01 PM
Gorgeous
ArathorofBarahir
01-03-2007, 02:18 PM
Amazing.
Lathriel
01-27-2007, 04:51 PM
Adenture
Haven't been on the Barrow downs for so long. Why? I don't know but I missed them more then I thought.
Gil-Galad
01-28-2007, 01:19 PM
Fellowship : interesting
Two Towers : better
Return of the King : dissapointing
Thenamir
01-29-2007, 11:28 AM
SaucepanMan: panoramic
Bethberry: panned
Thenamir: pandemonium?
Mithalwen
01-29-2007, 11:45 AM
superficial
Celegost
03-19-2007, 01:57 PM
The Fellowship of the ring: WOW :eek:
The Two Towers: Entertaining
The Return of the King: Awsome
narfforc
03-21-2007, 04:24 AM
over
alatar
03-21-2007, 12:47 PM
FotR - The Fellowship's the Thing.
TTT - The Too Tangential.
RotK - The Return of thinKing.
Elladan and Elrohir
03-22-2007, 02:08 PM
Audacious.
jezebelus
04-04-2007, 05:05 AM
I didn't wanna watch these movies untill few days ago because all my friend like them very much and I was sooo sick hearing them talking about these movies all the time so few days ago I decided to watch them all one by one. Its hard to say but I was wrong because I didn't want to watch them. I have to admit this trilogy is real masterpiece. I would like to know is there more similar movies? Also I know World Of Warcraft game is similar to this movie but its only for online playing, so does someone know some similar game which has single player campaign? I mean I like this kind of games, but I don't like strategy genre so I can't play LOTR game or older versions of Warcraft. I would like some third person or first person game surounded with world similar to Tolkin's. If you know for such a game please post it here.
vBulletin® v3.8.9 Beta 4, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.