Log in

View Full Version : We are all nerds now


Rimbaud
12-12-2003, 04:23 AM
Fun article (http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,4120,1104848,00.html) on the Guardian this morning, felt like sharing.

I particularly liked the part about plastic lightsabres.

--Rimbaud

Estelyn Telcontar
12-12-2003, 05:04 AM
Thanks, Rimbaud! So now we are all entitled not only to 15 minutes of fame, but also to 15% nerdism?! smilies/rolleyes.gif

I found one sentence very interesting; it expresses what we certainly experience here on the Downs: Lord of the Rings crosses all the gender and generational boundaries.

Rimbaud
12-12-2003, 11:12 AM
I find it sad that a book that can do that is considered so unusual.

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-12-2003, 01:03 PM
Video gaming
the comic-book movie (Spider-Man, Hulk), the sci-fi epic (The Matrix, Star Wars) and the wizard fantasy (Harry Potter).
fantasy junkies who thrill to Lord of the Rings
sci-fi aficionados
largest market for Simpsons

Incredible. I'm a nerd several times over. It seems that these days you cannot be passionate about something without being classified as a Geek, Nerd, Brainiac, or just plain Wierd.

I know what Linux is, I play an instrument, and I grew up watching Indiana Jones and Star Wars, so I'm a Geek. I watch Star Trek and Jeopardy, and I know what the Divine Ratio is, so I'm a Nerd. I enjoy literature and I remember odd trivia, so I'm a Braniac. And of course I draw too much, listen to heavy metal and hardcore music, wear my jeans until they fall apart, and would rather eat paste than supervise 4th graders (not that I did that recently smilies/wink.gif )... that gets me a Wierd in the eyes of the Cool people. Sadly the Cool people are the same ones who all listen to the same music, think knowledge is a waste of time and have relationships that last a week.

It saddens me that you can't love something without being considered an obsessive outcast.

Fea

LePetitChoux
12-12-2003, 01:14 PM
But none of us are nerds by definition:

According to the Collins English Dictionary, a nerd is something you emphatically don't want to be. It defines the term as referring to "1) a boring or unpopular person" or "2) a stupid and feeble person"

I know for as fact that none of us here are boring, unpopular, stupid or feeble. Therefore we are not nerds.

smilies/smile.gif

ArwenBaggins
12-12-2003, 04:11 PM
Very true LePetitChoux!

The people who wrote this article may call us 'nerds', but the dictionary saves the day again!

~Fëa

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-12-2003, 04:33 PM
boring, unpopular, stupid or feeble

Why thank you, Le Petit Choux and Arwen... I'm very glad not to be considered a nerd. Of course, by these standards, not many people are actually 'nerds'.

People enjoy nosing into my life, so I must not be boring, I'm friends with a rather large amount of people, I'm certainly not stupid (although sometimes I lack common sense), and you can see just how feeble I am when I'm the last one standing after a rough game of Floor Hockey against the guys. smilies/biggrin.gif

Cheers,
Fea

The Squatter of Amon Rûdh
12-12-2003, 05:44 PM
The Grauniad strikes again, with another article about nothing. I'm amazed at the lack of spelling mistakes: they must have employed some actual proof-readers recently. Perhaps next they'll start employing journalists; or is that too much to hope for?

(EDIT)
I can see the basic premise here: that interests and ideas that were once considered the preserve of the unwashed, the dysfunctional and the socially inept have recently made their way into the main stream. This is, of course, absolute rubbish: the term 'geek' was invented by morons to describe people who had interests outside the often bizarre norms of the classroom. As such it has always encompassed a massive swathe of the population: doctors, lawyers, scientists, authors, engineers and architects; film directors, artists, composers and even fashion designers. The geeks have inherited the earth because they were and are the people who make it run properly and try to give it meaning. Of course the article's writer finds a lot of himself in the geek: he is one. He writes for a living and wears glasses. There are a lot of other definitions too, but those are at least two of them. If you like real ale, take an interest in languages, study academic subjects in your spare time, write poetry or like word games you're a geek as well. In fact, one might simply take it as a catch-all term for anyone who lives any sort of inner life at all.

It might be more valuable to consider how adopting playground slang into adult language leads to the rise of derogatory terms so vague and nebulous that they could refer to anyone. Or we could simply say that the eighties were the decade of the sharp, the greedy and the predatorial; but the beginning of the third millenium is witnessing the rise of the modelmakers, the internet communities, the roleplayers, the amateur scientists and the fantasy and science fiction fans. We were always greater in numbers, but now we've become fashionable as well. Could this decade mark the dawn of the era of geek chic?

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 8:45 AM December 13, 2003: Message edited by: The Squatter of Amon Rûdh ]

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-12-2003, 07:06 PM
I take it that the Guardian is known for it's useless articles?

I'm slightly confused though... What exactly is this article about? If it's about Nerdity in the 21st Century, then why did they only post the opening day of Return of the King? I can think of some "nerdy" movies coming out soon besides that... Or if it was about Lord of the Rings and the opening of RotK, then they certainly went off on a tangent. If I was grading that article, I'd give it a C... While it was slightly entertaining, I had difficulty figuring out what the @#%$ it was talking about!

Fea

The Saucepan Man
12-12-2003, 07:43 PM
So now I am a "middle youther"? Cool. smilies/wink.gif

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-13-2003, 10:59 AM
I might have missed something... is there a new name for Nerdy 16-year old Girl?

Fea

Beren87
12-13-2003, 11:45 AM
Could this decade mark the dawn of the era of geek chic?

I think it's a little late for that. smilies/wink.gif Geek chic is in full swing.

I think the writer found something interesting, but didn't quite delve deep enough into the culture. "Geek" is certainly not a word with any negative conotation at this point, most true geeks celebrate their Geekhood at this day in age. I don't quite agree with Squatter's definition of Geek, as it was put. Geek is a much more specialized term than you're making it. Geek-hood is earned. They are in no way greater in numbers, and while are occasionally movers and shakers (how could they not be? There's no such thing as an un-intelligent geek), there are many who still belong to that "I live in my parent's basement" genre.

Simply because the objects of a geek's obsession has become mainstream doesn't mean that those who in turn enjoy those objects of fanaticism are indeed geeks. I even take a bit of offense to that.

Always remember that Fan is short for Fanatic, and unless you're a true fanatic, you're not a true fan. Geeks have always been fanatics.

I don't think that the author quite understands how much of a culture it is. Simply browsing through a comic shop or seeing a cult movie half a dozen times does not make you a geek. Having a "bit of geek" doesn't mean you are a geek.

But it does make a good point. Don't call us nerds. smilies/wink.gif

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 12:47 PM December 13, 2003: Message edited by: Beren87 ]

Lyta_Underhill
12-13-2003, 11:51 AM
In fact, one might simply take it as a catch-all term for anyone who lives any sort of inner life at all.
I like this definition, Squatter! I've never disavowed being both a nerd AND a geek! But, the sad thing of it is that, although, I've come to terms with this lifelong affliction and now believe it to be a strength, there are millions who have appropriated and modified it, so that it seems to mean something else now. Honestly, how many of the New Geeks have been tormented like us older ones (or have I been out of school too long?) It can be through torment and reflection that this inner life springs forth and becomes a primary force. So, in a way, the definition of "socially maladjusted" fits, and in another, it doesn't. It becomes an adjustment in itself--better than becoming an axe murderer! The only problem with that definition is that "socially" is changing. They just won't admit that the mainstream is fickle and the nerds and geeks are eternal! Hooray for the outcasts! smilies/wink.gif

Anyway, I thought the definition for a "geek" was a circus performer who bit the heads off chickens! smilies/biggrin.gif

Cheers,
Lyta

P.S. Thanks for allowing a geeknerd to rant a bit! smilies/wink.gif

P.P.S. But it does make a good point. Don't call us nerds. Ah, it is the age of sharp re-definitions, is it? I think perhaps these terms have become emotionalized and relativized (is that a word?) lately! I think it depends on what realm you move in. Geek and nerd can be internal or "in the eye of the beholder." Hard to pin down, just like any good topic of conversation! smilies/smile.gif

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 12:55 PM December 13, 2003: Message edited by: Lyta_Underhill ]

Diamond18
12-13-2003, 12:07 PM
Most likely the definition is a hangover from the old days, when the nerd was relegated to the library and only emerged to have sand kicked in his face or get a wedgie.

There they go again, giving libraries a bad name. Why I oughta.... smilies/tongue.gif

The thing that amuses me, is that all this keeps coming back to unwashed, pimply bodies and glasses. The only people who can escape the interests of nerdism, would by default be devoid of any imagination, intelligence or real social skills (I mean, you'd have to have a small vocabulary and little brainpower, so how could you be sociable?). So how come the terminally stupid are the ones who supposedly manage to be clean and attractive and "cool"? And the people who actually have personalities and interests are considered the ugly, boring, smelly ones?

It just goes to show how illogical it is to let high school cliquishness perpetuate into adult life and the world at large. The article rather contradicted itself, by not admitting that the term "nerd" has always been a stupid term stupid people use to label others. I found this interesting:

mainstream cool (as represented by MTV and the David Letterman show).

If that's the case, why does LotR always do so well at the MTV Awards?

Annalaliath
12-13-2003, 12:38 PM
I'm a nerd according to this, but you have to realize that people at school have figured out already not to get me started on LOTR, Aname, and certain games. But I guess this article could be called usless caue we already knew that didn't we.

littlemanpoet
12-13-2003, 12:44 PM
Seems to me, the defacto definition is provided by those who are not nerds, and is therefore quite simple: A nerd is someone who is not cool.

I think it's like social mobility. Anybody can recreate themselves if they learn how. I used to be uncool. Now I'm only uncool at home. I put on the cool persona at work. It's easier to get through the day that way. Heh. Sometimes the persona slips "when the wax gets hot". How much is a body willing to compromise to maintain cool?

And what was once uncool can become cool. It's all in the minds of the "in" crowd, who then foists it on the "out" crowd; unless someone or group can stage a revolution of sorts.

Lyta_Underhill
12-13-2003, 12:56 PM
The only people who can escape the interests of nerdism, would by default be devoid of any imagination, intelligence or real social skills (I mean, you'd have to have a small vocabulary and little brainpower, so how could you be sociable?). Of course, they could mean that nerds are so rarified and think beyond the realm of mere humanity that they are unable to bring themselves down to play the petty games of "sociability!" smilies/wink.gif (I know they didn't mean this, but, then again, how better to pigeonhole something so that the great masses of mainstream types can understand and yet not feel threatened?)

It just goes to show how illogical it is to let high school cliquishness perpetuate into adult life and the world at large. Well said, Diamond! I hold only loosely to any one's definition of "types", knowing it can be easily gotten around in specific cases. The micro is often lost in the macro. A single drop can be more interesting than the whole lake if it is delved into with good intentions. The concern for individual detail and the depth of an idea and being seem to me to be more rewarding than the bland overview of the "fashionable." When the fad for sci-fi and fantasy in the mainstream is over, the "geeks" and "nerds" will go on, and the regular folks will wipe their eyes and wonder where Wonderland went and wake up to the dreary everyday once more, never realizing they missed the real meaning of it all...

Cheers!
Lyta

Luthien_ Tinuviel
12-13-2003, 04:12 PM
The Grauniad strikes again, with another article about nothing. I'm amazed at the lack of spelling mistakes: they must have employed some actual proof-readers recently. Perhaps next they'll start employing journalists; or is that too much to hope for?

Oh, Squatter! Too funny!

In fact, one might simply take it as a catch-all term for anyone who lives any sort of inner life at all.


Yes, so it would seem. Although I for one have never really minded any of the terms used for such people (or shall I say us?) By Feanor's definition I am somewhat of a geek, nerd, braniac and weirdo all wrapped into one. Which suits me just fine. smilies/biggrin.gif

They just won't admit that the mainstream is fickle and the nerds and geeks are eternal! Hooray for the outcasts!

Three cheers for outcasts!

Honestly, how many of the New Geeks have been tormented like us older ones (or have I been out of school too long?)

I've often thought about that. The older generation of geeks, nerds, whatever, often speak of the torment they received at school, which I have received at various times in my life, but not for the same reasons that they did. In fact, I've hardly ever been wholly disliked, but I've never quite "fit in" anywhere. I guess I'm a bit like Frodo in that regard. But once again, my problems were caused by completely different issues than interests. I am a child of missionaries, and lived in the Czech Republic for five years (I'm actually half-Czech). That doesn't entirely encourage social relationships in America. And now that I homeschool, I must say that the Downs is one of my primary (and certainly most enjoyable) forms of socialization. But even in a normal public junior high or high school, it seems that geek chic is definately in. What used to be outcasts are now accepted, if not wholly understood, individuals. A so-called geek cannot usually become popular within the school at large, but definately in their social group, which is now an accepted group. Lines seem to be blurring, and stereotypes are merging, but the mainstream still holds sway. I think it's a common phenomenon: those teenagers given to introspection and thought, and those who have sophisticated interests, are regarded as weird by the larger group, who are themselves the boring ones. It would seem that this is sometimes carried over into adulthood.

Bêthberry
12-13-2003, 06:53 PM
More in keeping with what Estelyn and Rimbaud have suggested is one value of Tolkien are these comments from academicians who are journeying to Toronto, Canada for The Gathering of The Fellowship for the next three days.

As one of the so-called purists, Wages added, she wanted to ensure there was a healthy dose of academe in the conference lineup. Panel discussions include
everything from "Tolkien and Beowulf" to "Harry Potter is a Hobbit" to the role of women in Middle Earth.

Michael Drout, associate professor of English at Wheaton College in Massachusetts, says he agreed to come to the event "mostly because the people who asked me were so nice." Added Drout, "I've studied Tolkien, and I'm a specialist in Anglo-Saxon literature, and the one thing I've learned is that no matter how deeply you work, there is always someone out there who knows more about Middle Earth than you do. Some of the very best Tolkien scholars are not associated with any university."

Jane Chance, recognized in Tolkien circles as one of the first academics to initiate serious Tolkien studies, is also flying to Toronto. Reached in her hometown of Atlanta, she explained that she's making the journey because she loves to hobnob with like-minded people.

"I'm very curious about what mix of people will be there, and what will happen," says Chance, a professor at Rice University in Texas. "For 25 years, I've been studying medieval sources for much of what Tolkien created, among other things," she said. "And I love these events. I think Tolkien fans bring to their subject not only an enthusiasm and passion, but also a real commitment to their literature. They're like no other students I've taught in my life. I know of no other readers who read so willingly and so passionately as Tolkien readers."

All the proceeds from the event will be donated to ProLiteracy Worldwide's National Book Scholarship Fund and Laubach Literacy of Canada.

As far as Prof. Chance is concerned, the mass appeal of Tolkien ? to people from all walks and corners of life ? is simple. "He's a great literary salesman. He sells you his world, and you believe in it."


A first article can be found here about The Gathering of the Fellowship (http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031212.wtolk1212/BNStory/Front/)


What I am curious about, in terms of the Guardian article, is the Living Dead Dolls. After all, who knows what we all look like? And who plays with us?

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 8:37 PM December 13, 2003: Message edited by: Bêthberry ]

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-13-2003, 09:29 PM
After all, who knows what we all look like? And who plays with us?

My mom claims that I look somewhat like Liv Tyler...

Keeper of Dol Goldur looks kind of like Gambit from X-men...

smilies/evil.gif

Diamond18
12-14-2003, 04:22 PM
After all, who knows what we all look like? And who plays with us?

We have finally discovered what the whole deal behind Alk's member picture's page was about. For shame.

Luthien_ Tinuviel
12-14-2003, 05:12 PM
Diamond, you're right! He must be making a fortune off of the faces of Barrow-Downers. How shamelessly commercial. smilies/smile.gif

Theron Bugtussle
12-15-2003, 01:00 PM
Diamond: So how come the terminally stupid are the ones who supposedly manage to be clean and attractive and "cool"? And the people who actually have personalities and interests are considered the ugly, boring, smelly ones?How come? Because THEY have the POWER.

"Terminally stupid-cool" is a good phrase. Heh, heh! Now it occurs to me that there is a way for all of us LotR Geeknerds to wrest the power from those that currently have it (and I do not mean Peter Jackson).

ATTENTION: Immediately commence to loudly label the popular as "terminally stupid-cool!"

Ainaserkewen
12-15-2003, 02:13 PM
What's wrong with having these certain interests anyway? Some people like horses, some dance, some sports, some TV shows, video games...etcetera. Everybody is different and trying to catagorise people by saying "nerds" or "preps" just doesn't work. By definition, I fall under this "nerd" catagory. So what?! I don't live in front of a computer, or a manga comic book, or playing cards...they just happen to be interests of mine. I'm sorry, but I get very defensive about derogatory terms used to group people together so they're easier to pick on by the "better" people. Everyone who falls under these "nerd" credentials...be proud that you know what you like and are interested in and not "liking" something because everyone else does. You're yourself and there is nothing bad about it.

Lush
12-16-2003, 12:50 AM
I think the article is pretty cool, if a little late in the writing (geek-chic has been in since Bill Gates started making gajillions).

Actually, one of the few powerful figures in the Western world today who does not fit the standard definition of a nerd would be the current U.S. President (and no, this is neither a criticism nor a compliment, so keep your rotten eggs for a better occasion).

In general, I think the term for the so-called outcast, the nerd", is quickly being replaced by the more general label of "loser," one that cuts across all sorts of previous boundaries.

The loser is not neccessarily classified by what sort of books he or she reads, movies he or she watches, or light-sabers he or she plays with (although it often ends up that way). The definition is more based on an almost subconscious assessment of whether or not the person in question successfully functions in society.

Is this particular label fairly deserved? In most cases, probably not.

Overall, I am against both the stereotyping of the "outcasts" and the so-called "in-crowd."

I don't think it's classy to think less of a person for spending the entire weekend reading, but I also disapprove of looking down on someone for spending the entire weekend clubbing (or something even more interesting).

Also, some people can easily do both in two consecutive weeks, earning the label of both "dorky" and "vapid" (or whatever it is that the party people are being referred to these days).

Personally, I am for people being able to enjoy themselves wherever they venture, and to hell with what someone might think.

***EDIT***

For an environment that encourages both the "nerd" persona and the "in-crowd" image, look no further than my own Duke University, where we "work hard and play hard." Let me tell you, this sort of lifestyle leaves you exhausted.

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 1:54 AM December 16, 2003: Message edited by: Lush ]

Rumil
12-23-2003, 09:27 PM
I thnk the real question which impinges on the minds of many here is whether the Tolkienism of ourselves is offputting to the opposite sex. I've seen posts recently which claim that the Downs has more female than male members, surely they can't all be Orli-obsessives?

In that case, why not form a relationship with someone who is committed to the ideals you believe in? The preservation of trees, the opposition to dictators, the irrelevance of the superbowl. Can this worldview be so uncommon?

On the other hand I admit that I have taken the cowards way out, I haven't talked about LoTR to the people I thought would ridicule me for this interest. Is this wrong? Surely not, this is social self-preservation, you have to play the game, when in Rome, do as the Romans do etc. I have good, valid, sound friends who think that ME is rather childish. Who am I to say that they are wrong? I would trust these people with my life though not my imagination.

I think you can learn a lot from the people who reject you, even though that might not be their intention. I like to think of Tolkien as an inspiration rather than a determinant of division.

Teleri
12-24-2003, 12:31 AM
I'm not a geek! Really! I just want to live in Lothlorien... or maybe the Shire...
O.k. that whole Orlando Bloom thing really annoys me! I'm the only girl I know (only teenage girl, anyway) who doesn't squeal when his name is mentioned. I hate it! I seem to be steriotyped along with the so called "screaming fan-girls". I've squealed only once, thank you! And that was only when I saw that Gorbag was cast (I love the whole think about the orcs thinking Sam is an elven warrior, or a tark, or a group of rebel orc... or all three smilies/wink.gif) and in my own defence, That's been my favorite part since I was eight (No wait! I also love Scouring and the Grey Havens... oh and that part with the star over mordor)

P.S. I have nothing against these "So called screaming fan-girls". Just a bit irked at the people who decided all girls belong to the group.

mark12_30
12-24-2003, 09:17 AM
" ...that old Bilbo Baggins. 'Cracked, 'ee was."

"And there's young Mr. Frodo Baggins, now; he's cracking."

"And proud of it! Cheers, Gaffer."

********
"And there's mark12_30, now... geek, she is."

"And proud of it! Cheers..."

Thulorongil
12-24-2003, 02:05 PM
Well said, Ainaserkewen. What is the point at all in creating labels and sorting people into groups in the first place? What is it really going to accomplish? Sure, you get to have fun thinking of some great word that's going to be used and hated for years to come and then witness everyone's reaction and see everyone start to detest each other, but what's the point in putting effort into things like that when there are so many better ways that you could spend your time? Reading, for example! I'm sure that there are people older and wiser than me reading this thread, thinking back on when they were my age, shuddering at the bad memories, and at the same time wondering why it was such a big deal and why they didn't do anything about it. Well, right now I am my age and right in the thick of battle between the labeled groups. Everyone says that it gets better when people have more important things in their life going on, but why should that matter? Why would degrading other people be the important thing in many people's lives? Once again, what's the point?!

I say, that if you're going to be labeled as something, make the label to be what you want it to be. Make the best of the situation. I've been a Nerd/Geek/Brainiac/whatever else anyone can come up with my entire life. I figure, why fight it? If that's who I am, I don't care about that fact, and there are people out there that can accept the fact that I am who I am and they are who they are, who cares? I have a tight group of friends, and we're all sorted into the Nerd category. But, like I said, we decided not to fight it. We named our group the United Nerds and Geeks of the galaxy, or UNGG/Uhn-guh-guh for short. Nerd and Geek just aren't insults anymore. Now it's more distressing to one of us to be a "Dren" or a "cool" or "popular" person, simply because we chose it to be that way. Other people in our school still have the mindset that they are better than us, but when they say, "You're just too much of a nerd, you nerd!" We just say, "Thankie!"

~Thúle

Rouroni
12-24-2003, 02:27 PM
I have indeed been labeled a nerd, for my dress style, my penchant for reading, and talking with proper English.

These thing are nothing I am ashamed of. If that is the new definition of nerd, then i am proud to be one.

However, as it has been mentioned before, there are quite a few new members on the barrow downs, mostly because of the new movies, and if the female population has risen dramatically, this is most likeley because of the horrid Orlando Bloom character.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard someone say that they are a fan of Lord of the Rings, and thus a Nerd, I would be a very rich person.

However, when asked further, the "nerd" in question is merely a pop-culture sheep. A true fan of LotR would know what the Barrow-Downs are.

Thulorongil
12-24-2003, 03:06 PM
No matter how fun and tempting it is, though, to Immediately commence to loudly label the popular as "terminally stupid-cool! all we really are doing is the exact same thing that we are saying is unfair: treating people a certain way because they are labeled something. True, the Nerds and Geeks may have more history of being ridiculed, and we seem like an easier target, it doesn't help matters to retaliate with the same acts that we are retaliating against. I'll admit, I have and I do dislike many Drens for being Drens, but thinking about it, I really wish that I didn't.

Lush
12-24-2003, 03:27 PM
I thnk the real question which impinges on the minds of many here is whether the Tolkienism of ourselves is offputting to the opposite sex.

Nah.

Intelligent people go for looks, and to hell with what's on your bookshelf.

smilies/biggrin.gif

Finwe
12-24-2003, 05:08 PM
My parents did a very funny thing after we all went to go see Return of the King. Apparently they didn't like it, because they thought it dragged on too long, and they got tired of my glowing descriptions of it. So, they sat me down, and told me straight off the bat, that I was "driving people away" by being so obsessed with Middle-earth. I just kind of sat there and ignored them until they stopped talking, which is what I usually do when they lecture me.

Now, I say to the world:

"If you don't have the understanding to put up with something that I like, or don't realize that it shouldn't matter whether you're obsessed with Lord of the Rings, then screw you!"

smilies/biggrin.gif smilies/biggrin.gif smilies/biggrin.gif

Teleri
12-25-2003, 12:05 AM
"What is the point at all in creating labels and sorting people into groups in the first place? What is it really going to accomplish?"

It'll make it easier to sort everyone up if, for some reason, everyone on earth needed to live in a large filing cabinet.

Finwe: The next time your parents say something like that, point out to them that reading Tolkien is an English, Ethics, and Language theory class rolled into one. Also, point out how nice we Tolkien readers are smilies/biggrin.gif

Annalaliath
12-26-2003, 06:38 AM
You know that just because a person is a nerd that is not a bad thing. I really don't know what I was considered in high school. But in College I am a Tolkien freak and a game and aneme nerd. Even though the people in my school now are grown up and stuff they still can act like children.

I have recently come to the conclusion that many teenage girls are like chickens. Now, no offense to any one, but if you have chickens you know how petty they are. The boys are much the same too. Also, some of them(the teenagers I mean) don't grow out of it.(hey I still do stupid petty things from time to time, lets face it none of us grow completely out of it; some are just worse than others) I think that this chicken way of life leads to unfair categorizing, and so those of us who are able to see the stupidity for what it is should stop it. But that won't happen anytime soon, now will it.

Don't get me wrong I try to be nice to most people, but my social skills are horrible and so I struggle. In College, especially the one I go to, the people look grown up some in their 40's and such but they aren’t. They still make fun of me 'cause I like Tolkien, but the rest of them are nerds too, that's why we're in the animation department. They just don't know it yet. One dude thought I was stupid because he was acting childish and was bugging me and I told him to leave me alone, repeatedly. I won't go into this because the story is too long. But he thinks I am stupid and tells a friend of mine while I was out of the room, like my friend wouldn’t tell me.... But anyway this is in college where we are supposed to be beyond this kind of thing. But we're not. We still act like chickens!

So, nerd yes. Ridiculed yes. do I care sometimes! and what do I do about it, keep taking Tolkien and Legacy of Kain till ears start to bleed.....

Rouroni
12-26-2003, 05:08 PM
Overall, I am against both the stereotyping of the "outcasts" and the so-called "in-crowd."

So am I, as are many people, especially those who have felt the sting of stereotypes placed unfairly upon our heads.

But those lines have become incredibly thin. The divisions exist, but, at my school at least, it is cool to be a nerd. Or at any rate, the stereotypical nerd.

Something quite strange is going on, and it might not have altogether disasterous means.
Perhaps we are looking at an end (or at least a decline) in the stereotypes of our parents and grandparents.

Annoying as it might seem to have a girl say "O my god, I looooove Lord of the Rings! Orlando Bloom and Elijah Wood are so hot! I have seen all the movies like, ten times!", it might prove usefull in the long run, for us nerds, anyway.

As for the nerd population, it has grown from the steroetypical, plaid shirt, glasses, braces, inhaler sucking, library dwelling lizards of yesteryear. I have friends who talk both Tolkien and Sports.

Perhaps the widening of the nerd pool (so to speak)will (eventually)limit the social agony we have to go through to recieve a high school education.

Morgoth the Great
12-26-2003, 08:45 PM
Its just lovely to know that the media shines upon so brilliantly isnt it, lol. i liked the idea that we all go to star-trek conventions.... smilies/rolleyes.gif

Theron Bugtussle
12-29-2003, 04:39 PM
Thulorongil: all we really are doing is the exact same thing that we are saying is unfair: treating people a certain way because they are labeled something.I missed the part where life has to be fair. It certainly wasn't fair in M-E. Wishing away unfairness will not work. You were much more on target with your earlier post about taking the lemons (labeling) and turn them into lemonade. smilies/cool.gif

Finwe: My parents did a very funny thing after we all went to go see Return of the King.Psst, Finwe! They did that because they love you...and because you are an obsessed freak! smilies/biggrin.gif (Just kidding.)

---> IN GENERAL <---

One may object to stereotyping, labeling, put-downs, etc. One can even refuse to engage in the activities as payback to those who mistreat or mis-label or any-label them. That, however, will not keep others from labeling you. Get used to it.

I, for one, am intrigued by Lush's term 'vapid' and hereby label everyone else on this thread as VAPID. There is a label that will never die in my book!

And Lush, you are right, in that The Intelligent go for looks--if they can get them. And, speaking totally hypothetically, if I was interested in you, I would be looking at your bookshelf, and if I didn't find the right stuff there, I would quickly drop you as VAPID. (Regardless of my opinion of your good looks.)

Theron Bugtussle
12-29-2003, 04:53 PM
This reminds me of the one about the orchestra conductor who had struggled throughout his single life with whether to marry a beauty or a musician. A musical wife would be able to appreciate his life's work and contribute to it thereby. And a beauty, well, ...needs no other justification.

Finally, at a party, he met an up-and-coming opera singer that was stunningly beautiful. He fell head over heels in love, and was able to win her heart in short order. They were married and on their wedding night he was just rejoicing that he had not been forced to make a terrible compromise and do without either beauty or musical talent.

While pondering his good fortune, his new bride began preparing for bed. She removed her makeup, and was transformed into a rather homely sight. Next, she took off her wig, and he was horrified to see the thinnest wiry hair imaginable. Before he could recover his composure, out came her dentures, plop! into a water glass. When he thought it couldn't get worse, she sat on the edge of the bed, flashed a toothless grin at him, and proceeded to unstrap a wooden leg.

This was all too much for the maestro, who in a fit of desperation, jumped up on the bed and yelled, "For heaven's sake, woman, SING!"

Durelin
12-29-2003, 05:02 PM
It really is surprising how you never are in any way alone, no matter which nerd category you place yourself under for the day. I seem to be under too many at different times.

And I guess it's reassuring to know you're part of the "most monumental nerd-fest of the lot!"

pop-culture omnivores who dig up Japanese Manga and obscure B-movies and find patron saints in Kevin Smith and Quentin Tarantino

Unfortunately, I know several pop-culture omnivores, who are also strangely LOTR fans.

Nerds are highly intelligent but they have no social skills whatsoever. You can't hold a proper conversation with a nerd.

He forgot one thing: Nerds have no social skills, except over the internet.

anything to do with Marvel or DC Comics, or Lord of the Rings

Add Warhammer to that list and that's my family.

I'm having way too much fun with this! Thanks Rimbaud! smilies/biggrin.gif

Oh, and on the matter of stereotyping: I find it quite amusing when people stereotype themselves. smilies/wink.gif

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 2:00 PM December 31, 2003: Message edited by: Durelin ]

Feanor of the Peredhil
12-30-2003, 08:13 PM
Just out of curiosity... what's a Dren?

And to be honest... I notice a guy's looks first, but if he's none too smart... he's out of there. He's also got to be funny.

Fea

Everdawn
12-30-2003, 10:00 PM
Ive never copped anything for liking Tolkien, my friends think its cool and we all have our own things.

What i have come across in the terms of "Nerd" are the guys who do nothing but leave the computer rooms at school and if you try to talk to them they are really nasty to you. There are some people who spend a lot of time at the computers, but they are nice, so the nerds are the nasty ones.

I started reading Tolkien becuase everyone else was reading Harry Potter, i am always wanting to be an individual, then everyone started reading Tolkien (good for him, but bad news for me, becuase my individuality was gone) so i started delving myself into the history.

It was really entertaining when i went and say ROTK with my friend Bekki, who i had to explain everything to and now she is obsessed with the Kings of Numenor. She was like "how do you know so much?" and i said. "I have the 'downs, i learn from people."

I reffer to 'our kind' as Fans not Nerds. smilies/wink.gif

Orominuialwen
12-31-2003, 01:52 PM
Personally, I'm rather proud of my geekiness. I've never really fit in with people my own age. It's not so much that lots of people hate me, I just feel like people don't really want me around. But that's okay. I have 3 good friends my age, and I get along much better with adults than those my own age. I have one firend who's 18 years older than I am (she also has the same birthday as JRRT - I'm so jealous!). I find that if people dislike me because I'm into music that was cool when my parents were kids, or I dress differently than they do, or I have very different politics than almost everybody where I live, or I'm constantly talking about LotR, it's really their problem, not mine. I think my vocabulary of elvish insults helps, though! smilies/tongue.gif I really think I have more friends here on the 'Downs than in "real life." Nobody's really mean or judgemental here. smilies/smile.gif

Em
12-31-2003, 04:34 PM
I really agree with you, i only know ONE person at my school who is a TRUE fan of lotr so when i found this site i was so relieved, i finally fit in somewhere. smilies/biggrin.gif

Annalaliath
12-31-2003, 08:46 PM
I got the coolest pin today, it says geek. I added this to my LOTR pins on my coat. Now I need to put my Zelda patch on it and it will be my official geek coat.

I also seem to spend alot of time at the animation staion in the mall and I am almost about to beat the Hobbit game. And it has taken my mother and me 3 days to halfway complete a Hobbit puzzle......

I am a Geek, or nerd which ever one.

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 9:49 PM December 31, 2003: Message edited by: Annalaliath ]

Finwe
01-01-2004, 02:15 PM
You might be a geek. smilies/biggrin.gif Don't worry, I spent three hours playing LotR Trivial Pursuit with myself, the day that I got it. It didn't really help my bad habit of talking to myself. Now THAT is geeky!

Em
01-01-2004, 04:37 PM
Whenever my mum catches me talking to my self she says that i'm not really talking to myself! (now thats something to get you thinking about!!!) Plus anytime you think you are a nred(geek, which ever) don't! we are the educated, intelectual people of society, and all of our critics will be working in our huge mansions, scrbbing toilets. if they are lucky and you are kind enough!!! smilies/evil.gif

Annalaliath
01-02-2004, 02:47 PM
Hey my Bible study involves transalting it to Elvish. It takes weeks just for two or three verses. Fun though. my problem is the fact I can't find my thesorus. And I am not the best at reading the Bilbe to begin with. I Guess this is a good way of conferming Geekyness and actually doing what I should have been doing for years..... Any other BDers out there who are christians interested... PM me... but anyway, I think this is like a christian trecky doing the same thing with clingon(SP?)....

Lush
01-02-2004, 06:05 PM
One may object to stereotyping, labeling, put-downs, etc. One can even refuse to engage in the activities as payback to those who mistreat or mis-label or any-label them. That, however, will not keep others from labeling you. Get used to it.

One can learn to live with these things, but to stop protesting them? Never. This is why I go to the library in a mini.

I, for one, am intrigued by Lush's term 'vapid' and hereby label everyone else on this thread as VAPID. There is a label that will never die in my book!

Oh, but I didn't invent it.

And Lush, you are right, in that The Intelligent go for looks--if they can get them.

I, for one, go for looks because I don't want my future children to curse me for polluting my bloodline and leaving them without the advantages that good looks have to offer. Though the initial screening usually hints at great disappointment ahead, and in this, I have rallied my mind to go to war with biology. Hardy har har.

(Then again, Sartre was painful to look at, and we can't even begin to count all the women he got, nevermind his great contributions to world culture.)

And, speaking totally hypothetically, if I was interested in you, I would be looking at your bookshelf, and if I didn't find the right stuff there, I would quickly drop you as VAPID. (Regardless of my opinion of your good looks.)

Well, there's the LotR and Bible, but then again there's The Delta of Venus and my friends Nabokov and Joyce (both of whom were once banned for being scandalous).

Sometimes a glance at my bookshelf confuses people. This is when I tell them to drop their silly stereotypes (if only we could do that as easily as, say, dropping our pants).

Mine is a foolishly idealistic quest, but at the very least, it grants me an aura of moral superiority and I recommend it highly to every thinking person, including all the members of this board, who have all, at one time or another, felt that they were being judged on sadly superficial terms. smilies/wink.gif

<font size=1 color=339966>[ 7:07 PM January 02, 2004: Message edited by: Lush ]

Eruantalon
01-02-2004, 06:57 PM
hummm vary interesting topic....all I have to say is.


Measure me by my heart not your ideas of me. Becuse your ideas can lie.

Dininziliel
01-21-2004, 11:43 PM
When TT opened, I was there at the first showing in the long line waiting to be let into the theatre. Since it was a week night, and since none of my good movie buddies are Tolkien fans, I was alone. The question of where to sit became moot as we all simply flowed into the theatre as one. I found myself sitting next to young boys of about 15. (I say "young" because I am 50.) "Is it okay if I sit here?" I asked, thinking they might cringe at the thought of sitting next to an "old lady." The reply was, "No, milady. Pray thee, have a seat." Charmed, I sat down and felt rather optimistic about my movie companions. "Are you here because you like the movies or the books?" I asked. "Milady, we are Tolkien geeks in every sense of the word." 'Nuff said, I thought (using my previous Marvel vernacular). We proceeded to watch TT and exchanged comments every so often--"Oh no!!! I can't believe it! Why did they . . .?" "Wow! they really nailed that scene down!" "Oh, they DID put that scene in the movie. Good!" and so on.

Since leaving the theatre that night, I've had many occasions to say to people, "I'm a Tolkien geek." And I was, and am, proud. Only I don't say it so much anymore because there were some looks of pity and, as most of you know, when you get looks of pity for being enthused about all things Tolkien, there's no point in explaining.

the phantom
02-09-2004, 11:38 PM
I thnk the real question which impinges on the minds of many here is whether the Tolkienism of ourselves is offputting to the opposite sex.
Not that I've noticed in my personal experience. Sometimes it's been the exact opposite but I guess it ultimately depends on which crowd of the opposite sex you hang out with.
And, speaking totally hypothetically, if I was interested in you, I would be looking at your bookshelf, and if I didn't find the right stuff there, I would quickly drop you as VAPID.
I understand what you're saying but I would want more than just a "look" at her bookshelf. For example if I didn't see any fantasy or sci-fi I would ask her why that was. If she responded with some comment like "I think that stuff is stupid, it's not real life" or "I can never get into that stuff" that is when I'd bid her a hasty goodbye, better luck next time.
I, for one, go for looks because I don't want my future children to curse me for polluting my bloodline and leaving them without the advantages that good looks have to offer.
:D Same here! (but I'm also looking for height, 5'9" isn't terrible but I'd like to be taller but since I can't make myself taller the next best thing is to make sure my son is taller, it's not a must, but preferable)

But the geek part is a must. She doesn't have to be super geeky or even considered to be a geek, but she needs to at least be geeky enough to understand my geeky side and have intriguing interests unlike those vapid people who do nothing but go to clubs. ;)

Theron Bugtussle
02-18-2004, 03:12 PM
Originally posted by Lush
One can learn to live with these things, but to stop protesting them? Never. This is why I go to the library in a mini. Mini: Van?
Skirt?
Cooper?
Mood?
Bus?
:smokin:
Oh, but I didn't invent it ["vapid"]. Well, duh, but I like it. It fits the stereotyping mold, but still sounds highbrow.

Sometimes a glance at my bookshelf confuses people. This is when I tell them to drop their silly stereotypes. ...and...Originally posted by the phantom
I understand what you're saying but I would want more than just a "look" at her bookshelf. For example if I didn't see any fantasy or sci-fi I would ask her why that was. If she responded with some comment like "I think that stuff is stupid, it's not real life" or "I can never get into that stuff" that is when I'd bid her a hasty goodbye, better luck next time.Well, okay, what is agreed is that a 'look' at the subject's bookshelf isn't enough. That gets a discussion started, and that is of prime importance to find out if this is a worthwhile companion material. ;)

Originally posted by Lush
...have all... felt that they were being judged on sadly superficial terms. Although, if your occasional results are positive, it can be okay to be judged on happily superficial terms. ;)

Thulorongil
06-28-2004, 08:43 PM
Wow, Feanor, I'm sorry! I was just checking back on this thread I really enjoyed, and I realized I never defined Dren for the world. My friends and I decided we needed a name for all those people in the world that had a problem with us being ourselves, or nerds. So with a little creative spark, we reversed the word Nerd and came up with a perfectly suitable solution. (It was either that or "keeg" which just sounds dumb.)

That's another example of going out against the Drens. Our little group's name (the UNGG; see above) that came out of too much sugar and annoyance with drens in our bloodstream has stuck since the sixth grade. Now in the midst of high school, there's still drens, but we like to laugh at the truly stupid things they do. I've said before that it's simply a compliment to be called a nerd. I wonder what life must be like for the people I meet who'd be embarassed to go to the Renaissance Festival in full period-garb or would sneer at the idea of studying elvish or--gasp!--READING in their spare time. Well, I know one thing: they wouldn't be caught dead here!

Too bad for them.

Feanor of the Peredhil
06-29-2004, 08:49 AM
No problem, Thu, I'd forgotten about my dren query anyhow. Although, to reflect... I'm amazed that I didn't figure out 'dren' myself, being such a nerdy fan of word games. :D

And I've come to the conclusion that nerdity is in the eye of the beholder. Just this morning I had somebody tell me that my brother is "wicked cool". My brother is an active member here, also a member of a few G.I. Joe and other such forums. He's a Legend of Zelda enthusiest (as am I), he plays Magic (as I am soon to learn), and he writes comics books. He's also brilliant. To me, he's cool (not that I'd admit it to him), but he's also a big nerd (and truly proud to admit it). Like I said... nerdity is in the eye of the beholder.

Fea

PS- and Thu: my friends and I have our own names for people like drens. It's not nearly as nice. ;)

Saraphim
06-29-2004, 08:22 PM
Alas, my lack of employment makes it impossble for me to wear full period costumes to the said Renaissance Festival. I must be content to wear my Barrow-Downs shirt, and advertise to would-be Downers.

I recently was called a nerd by a friend who is one herself. I told her that I liked to copy notes in World History, and the rest is...well...history. :p

One Axe to Rule them All
06-30-2004, 09:21 AM
Maybe you're the crazy ones.....

Seriously, I'm proud of my nerdiness, and I'm sure there's a godly nerdy woman out there in the world somewhere waiting just for me....

(Hey, I can dream, can't I?)

Lush
06-30-2004, 09:30 AM
I'm back in Kiev right now, and most Tolkien fans you usually meet here are incredibly hot, intelligent, educated women that wear extremely nice shoes. Also, boys that would be cute if their haircuts weren't awful.

So go figure.

One Axe to Rule them All
06-30-2004, 09:37 AM
Hold up a second. Hot, intelligent, educated, Tolkienite FEMALES?!?!(with nice shoes to boot?)

Where is this heavenly place, for my eyes so long to see it....

Lush
07-01-2004, 05:16 AM
Like I said, it's Kiev.

HerenIstarion
07-01-2004, 07:33 AM
Even if we are to doubt the greatness of number of those hot tolkienites, we may be sure of at least one falling into the category- that is, Lush herself currently in Kiev! ;) :smokin:

One Axe to Rule them All
07-01-2004, 11:06 AM
Quite so, I doubt not that Lush herself falls into that heavenly denomination.

Now would anyone by chance know the way to Kiev from say, Texas?

E. Fester
07-20-2004, 11:25 AM
Actually, I'm ... I'm quite proud of ... being a geek ... Sorry for all the ellipses, I just keep on ... keep on twitching. It reflects my ... current mood, I guess. But yeah, I'm very geeky. Nerdy. Weird. I get lots of different adjectives. No social skills; I tend to shut myself into rooms and headbang to loud music most of ... the time. My day comprises of waking up (a slow and painful process), drinking coffee, writing, headbanging, researching bands to a scary degree, and sleeping. It's a ... never-ending cycle, really *twitch* I'm not really a LotR geek; I just like forums :smokin: . Although I have read the books, more than once. Apparently that's enough to condemn me ... But being a geek is a good thing, I think. The only ones I have a problem with are ... are the ones who pretend to be geeky for the sake of obtaining an image. But True Geeks are great people ;)

One Axe to Rule them All
07-21-2004, 03:09 PM
Oh yes, fear the fake geeks, for they are up to no good and intend to penetrate our fortress of geekiness!

Feanor of the Peredhil
07-21-2004, 06:50 PM
Hold up a second. Hot, intelligent, educated, Tolkienite FEMALES?!?!(with nice shoes to boot?) Did you ever doubt it? Being one of these intelligent, educated, Tolkienite females (with nice shoes), I can assure you, we aren't as hard to find as you'd think. Just depends on your definition of hot, because, being half dead from the first hot day in a month (summer? HA!) and from just having gone out on my blades to burn energy, I can confirm extreme hotness. But perhaps that's not what Lush meant? ;)

Saraphim
07-22-2004, 12:39 AM
Well, OAtRTA, first you start out by going north. Then, once you get to Canada, take a sharp easterly turn. That should cover you for a while. Somewhere along the line you may run into flooded roadways, but if you stick to it you should be in Kiev in about three months.

Anyway. Back to that ol' topic...

I've noticed that if I wear clothes that are popular (read: uncomfortable), do something with my hair and stick my contacts in, I don't get called a nerd. I get attention from people that normally would ignore me, and all in all have a boring time. I don't do this very often, needless to say.

I'm much more comfortable being somewhere with other nerds. I'm looking forward to Comic-Con this weekend. Nerd City, that place is.