What are your thought on the movies? [Archive] - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

The Barrow-Wight

05-03-2000, 06:42 AM

I am really excited by the prospect of seeing The Lord of the Rings on the silver screen. But I'm sure there may be some disappointments also because it is simply impossible for a filmmaker to adhere as strictly to a book (or three books in this case) as we fans would like. But overall, seeing Gandalf race across Rohan on Shadowfax or Bill Ferny get popped in the eye with an apple will be great (if these scenes make it into the films). So what are your thoughts, rants or raves? <a href="mailto:barrow-wight@kitgraphics.com">The Barrow-Wight</a> <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a>

bmilder

05-04-2000, 06:27 PM

I can't wait to see the movies! My only problem is waiting over a YEAR to see the first one! Having Tom Bombadil scrapped is sad, but necessary to keep the plot going. ---Ben Admin at <a href=http://pub2.ezboard.com/bbenjaminstolkienboard>Entmoot</a>, the largest J.R.R. Tolkien community on ezboard!

The Barrow-Wight

05-04-2000, 06:34 PM

I know what you mean, Ben. Christmas 2001 is such a long time from now. Amazingly they are going to be releasing a cinematic trailer this Summer. 1.5 years before the film's planned release. I wonder if that will set a record. I remember when the Armageddon trailer came out about a year before the movie's release and I thought that was incredibly early. Funny thing, Ben... I was just at Entmoot yesterday... but I was just lurking ... you don't have a shortage of members there. Thanks for coming here! <a href="mailto:barrow-wight@kitgraphics.com">The Barrow-Wight</a> <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a>

Morakyr

05-10-2000, 10:39 AM

I cannot wait. I vaguely remember seeing the animated movie at the theater as a small child. A motion picture would be fabulous!!

Balin999

05-19-2000, 08:12 AM

I absolutely LONG for those films!!!!!!! Ive seen this cartoon and was really disappointed because if you havent read the books the film does only confuse you. But im sure that the movies will be great. They have to be!!! We tolkien-fans deserve it!!! hehehe

BilboFrodo

06-01-2000, 02:17 AM

Well my thoughts are how can you scrape Tom Bombadil, its just doesn't make sense to me. And I am NOT going to see the movies as they will not be anything like I imagined the characters to be so it will ruin them for me, As no one would be the perfect Gandalf or Frodo for everyone so I am one fanatic who will not see the movies as to put it nice I think they will be crap. There is not one book I have read and then seen the movie based on the book and liked it one bit.

The Barrow-Wight

06-01-2000, 09:19 AM

Seeing these movies is going to be great! Your loss, really, if you refuse to see these movies. I've heard similar remarks from a few Tolkien fans, and though I understand the sentiment, I really don't see how seeing them will hurt anyone. Though there is absolutely no way that the films can match the book, I'm guessing that these films will be much truer to my visions of the books than the terrible Bakshi animated version was. But I am more interested in seeing how other people envision Middle-Earth than seeing a word-for-word rendition of the book (which would take 20 movies and 20 years). I'll watch it many times even if it really, really stinks! <a href="mailto:barrow-wight@kitgraphics.com">The Barrow-Wight</a> <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a>Edited by <A HREF=http://pub12.ezboard.com/urkittle.showPublicProfile>RKittle</A>  at: 6/1/00 11:19:48 am

Sharkû

06-07-2000, 12:55 PM

Christopher Lee is gonna RULE THE SCREEN!! Really, he as Curumo (he is still the cast, isn´t he?), I´m looking forward to it. One thing I´m worried about would be "biased filming", it is hard for any director to keep his own interpretations out of a production, and I fear that, for example, the orcs could be naziesque (esp. Saruman´s Uruk-Hai) or such.

Ferr

06-09-2000, 07:00 AM

Well, I'm keeping my fingers crossed...though, the screenshots look promising...and when it finally comes in the Dutch theaters (usually half a year later!!), I'm certainly am going to see it...Though I feel sympathy for our neighbours, the Germans...They always feel the need to re-speak (sorry, don't know the word rightnow) foreign movies...Like the German Arnold Schwarzenegger "Ich sollte wieder zuruck kommen" hahahahaa... Question: I also have seen the terrible animated movie of Mr. Bakshi, though only the first part...It ends, if I remember correctly, with the Battle of Rohan at Helmsgate...I have searched for part 2...without succes. Has it actually been brought out?? <tt>"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less then half of you half as well as you deserve"</tt>B. Baggins

burrahobbit

06-09-2000, 09:30 AM

I read somewhere that the movies are being released at the same time worldwide. I think you mean the Germans "dub" or "re-dub" movies. I have caught the end (pushing 20 times now) of a animated version that doesn't seem to have been made by the same guy. I always seem to catch it right after Cirith Ungol. It ends when Gandalf, Bilbo, and Frodo, probably some people I don't remember as well, leaving over the sea in a beautiful white boat. Of course, when I watched it I hadn't read the book yet, so Bilbo was just an old midget. In this version when Frodo put the Ring on he would disapear, but it wouldn't. To show where he was, I guess. Sting didn't disappear ether. The ending (until the very end, which goes very very fast) was good enough for me to waste 45 minutes almost 20 times, so it can't be the same guy. Or he got better for the second one. I think it was called The Return of the King. What's a burrahobbit got to do with my pocket, anyways?

burrahobbit

06-09-2000, 12:52 PM

Wow, that was long. But wait! There's more! At the siege of Minas Tirith there was a winged Nazgul. It was amazing! A winged horse with wings that could darken the sun! There was such an aura of power coming from the horse and rider that I thought they were defending the tower from invaders. As if it were Minas Morgul. And when Rohan came! Oh! I don't know that I've ever seen so many horses! A dozen wide stretching as far as any could see! And at the head an aged and noble king, riding in to save the world. And the sky! It was brown, an eternal twilight that helped me thing it was the nazgul's castle. It was overwhelming. I don't know if it showed the Witch-king die, I was too caught up in the scenery. What's a burrahobbit got to do with my pocket, anyways?

Sharkû

06-09-2000, 02:22 PM

You´re damn right about our "synchronizing" in Germany, not only because it takes away much of the spirit of the original, but also because there are so few speakers who are not too bad that they appear sooo often.. this way Gandalf will sound like Sean Connery always sounds, Boromir like ALF, Saruman like... oh, I better stop this nightmare. I´ve read somewhere that, in the Netherlands, even normal TV shows are in English, with the translation only readable at the bottom of the screen, is this true? Sounds good, but how do you think you can preserve your nation´s language that way? Soon the subtitles will disappear, and English will be the united language of Europe. Prof Tolkien would not have wanted this I assume. But fortunately, some smaller cinemas (which are, in turn, gradually disappearing, too) have sth. called "Wir lernen Englisch" - "We learn English" where they sometimes show movies in the original version. And, one can still borrow the English version at his local Video Buster Oh yeah, one thing, Arnold has to sound German - I cannot stand his talking English, his dialect is so strong, it sounds like German anyway )...

Balin999

06-10-2000, 03:36 AM

you mean he talks like this: " Ai'll bee baiik! " lol

lorien de loth

07-20-2000, 12:55 PM

my thought on the movies I feel fear every time I think about the movies. Will they respect the language, the poetry, the characters and the sense of humour of so many passages? I hope so, but I feel very pessimistic by now. I think a book is a book and a movie is a movie. In my opinion, Professor Tolkien deserves more than a simple description of his work in images and visual effects. Tolkien´s imagination deserve more inspiration by the film makers.

Boat Akk

07-21-2000, 03:50 AM

New Zealand Hello tolkienphiles! I am a resident of Christchurch, New Zealand and have a neighbour who is Gandalf's understudy!! Can anyone tell me where they are filming specific parts of TLotR? Rivendell for example? Boat Akk

burrahobbit

07-21-2000, 10:37 AM

Re: New Zealand Lucky. What's a burrahobbit got to do with my pocket, anyways?

galpsi

07-21-2000, 11:41 PM

Re: New Zealand Yeah really; I have a neighbor who sells plumbing supplies...and who talks about work a lot.

lindil

07-23-2000, 05:12 AM

Re: New Zealand after reading over the older postings on this topic, I must say that I admireBilboFrodo's 6/1 post that he won't see it as it wil only interfere w/ his impressions of the book.Of course he can always change his mind if every one of his friends tell him it's the best thing since say - Unfinished Tales: ] . I think honouring one's relationship to the books esp. after sooooo many bad movie adaptations make's a certain sense. Star Wars {forgive my mentioning it here to those whom it might offend} was lucky in that it preceded all of the many, many books that have since come out and the deep impressions caused by the movie allow one to read the later books w/ far greater sense of realism than the writings or plot often deserves! so - even though I will prob. go see it . I would be very unlikely to want tosee it so much that it alters my relationship w/ the books.{assuming they don't do an incredible A- or better job}. Edited by <A HREF=http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_profile&u=00000076>lindil</A> at: 7/23/00 7:22:26 am

galpsi

07-23-2000, 06:00 AM

Re: New Zealand I don't think that there is any rule that movies based upon books need always disappoint. I like John Huston's The Dead and also his Under the Volcano enormously despite already having had strong commitments to the books in question. That said, I'm not overly optimistic on PJ's behalf. Nevertheless, I'm with Kittle on this one. I anticipate the movie eagerly, both because I expect to have fun watching it and because I think we'll all have fun kvetching about its faults for weeks (at least). I think that serious misgivings are seriously misplaced. LotR will not be damaged by a weak movie. The books are plenty good enough not to be hurt by one. The bigger threat to one's "impressions of the book" would come from a good movie. But I'd be grateful for a good movie and I'm not worried in the least that even a good movie will overshadow either JRRT's writing, or my impressions of it.

lindil

07-23-2000, 06:32 AM

Re: New Zealand Then thou havest a stronger mind than I.

galpsi

07-23-2000, 06:47 AM

Re: New Zealand Or maybe just a misplaced sense of confidence. But I think that the difference between the kinds of story telling in movies and in novels is so great that they need not impinge upon one another. Movies can be stunning and ideally they have relatively great narrative clarity but I don't think that they can usually rival long books for depth or for the ability to express ideas with a maximal balance of economy and profundity. I like both.

The Barrow-Wight

07-23-2000, 06:55 AM

Re: New Zealand I just don't know how a bad movie can ruin ones perception of a book. All a bad movie can do is ruin ones perception of the same bad movie. If The Fellowship of the Ring movie is just awful then I will admire the book all the more. These movies can do nothing but strengthen my admiration for the good Professor's creations. The Barrow-Wight (RKittle) I usually haunt <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a> and The Barrow-Downs <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi">Middle-Earth Discussion Board</a>.

lindil

07-23-2000, 09:24 AM

Re: New Zealand pondering this a bit further I think that each person derives and looks for different things in Tolkien's writings as in most else. So that any disagreement over to see or not and wether the films will adversely or otherwise effect one's perceptions fundamentally comes down to wether you feel you would derive value out of it. I must admit I don' t put confidence in any of this -just interest and a bit of my heart.

lorien de loth

07-27-2000, 11:33 AM

my thought on the movies Thank you all, I am already not so pessimistic. But I think I didn´t express my toughts so well. Sorry for my english. The novel will always be the novel, with all his merits for itself, in this I agree. But what about the people that have not read the book? Maybe so many will read it after watching the films, but surely most will not. What image will they have about the novel then, if the film is not worthy at all?

The Barrow-Wight

07-27-2000, 01:07 PM

Then it is our duty to spread the word to read the books before the movies are released !! The Barrow-Wight (RKittle) I usually haunt <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a> and The Barrow-Downs <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi">Middle-Earth Discussion Board</a>.

Suldaledhel

07-28-2000, 11:19 AM

Re: my thought on the movies I agree with RKittle whole heartedly!!!!!!!!! We must inform others out there about the books and then the movies!!!!!!! I personally have long awaited these movies and hope that they will be nothing like The Hobbit movie...... besides being animated I tought the plot was underdeveloped and went too quickly by to know what was going on ( unless you had read the book of course!!) hopefully the director will take some time to build up the characters properky and thoroughly... but I dread it will not be done so.... I look forward to more movie news and excitedly await the realeases. Goodbye and farewell wherever you fare and may your eyries recieve you at the journey's end!!!!!!!

galpsi

07-29-2000, 03:28 AM

Re: my thought on the movies This is sort of strangely embarrassing to admit, but I just saw a still of the Argonath -- while surfing around -- and it was at least as good as the image I've been carrying around in my head all these years. (If you want to see it, I've stashed it here for convenience: <a href="http://www.geocities.com/herbert_hendrickson/otr.img4.river.gif">www.geocities.com/herbert_hendrickson/otr.img4.river.gif</a>, but it's about the size of a postage stamp -- sorry.) Edited by <A HREF=http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_profile&u=00000201>galpsi</A> at: 7/29/00 5:52:55 am

dogtrot

08-06-2000, 05:50 PM

Re: my thought on the movies I have been reading LOTR for nearly 20 years. If PJ's big screen version is dissapointing, then so be it. It will not affect my perception of this great story. I have seen some movies based on novels that I later read and enjoyed more than the movie and the only drawback is sometimes visualizing the characters as the actor portrayed(like catch 22, world according to garp). But I have been dissapointed in anticipated movie releases in the past such as Phantom Menace, but I think this due to all the hype. This movie has alot of hype already but as stated above we as Tolkien fans are here to discuss it and get the word out to "newbies" that there is a great piece of literature behind it and I read somewhere that sales of the trilogy is on the rise again. I too will see this movie many times even if it is terrible, but how can it be. There has got to be some redeming quality in it, if nothing else then it will bring all of us tolkien fans out of the woodwork!

lindil

08-08-2000, 11:20 AM

Re: my thought on the movies True enough Dogtrot. your point re: it effecting visualization of the book is for me a huge one- obviously for some peole it won't be. For some it my be a real plus [as the Star wars movies gave an amazing depth to sometimes great and sometimes lame books] I will undoubtedly see it once[God Willing I should say] -but if I didn't want it to become by default the prism through which I began to view [picture ] the books I might not see it again. the stills I have seen so far seem to be excellent [except for this newest one of Saruman? being impaled on what appears to be a piece of his own machinery] lindil and of course it will undoubtedly have a good effect on the [non] reading public especially all the cyber youth- the fact that H. potter is due to be released a month earlier will prob. help too.

coprophage7

08-18-2000, 08:44 AM

I'm a bit worried about the films, to tell the truth. I have yet to see a movie adaptation of a book which was as good as the novel (or better). Of course I'll go see the films, but I don't think that they will ever take the place of TLOTR novels. Liv Tyler as Arwen is questionable, but I know that if anyone could handle Galadriel, Cate Blanchet can!

gamegie

09-05-2000, 01:00 AM

I am also a little worried about the movies. Of course I will have to go and see them and possess them as soon as they come out in VCD or DVD or whatever, but I am scared that it will not do the book/TOLKIEN justice at all. I don't know about you but I have rarely seen a movie after having read the book and thought it was very good. The main reason I am worried is that so many scenes in the book I have imagined and I have visions of, and these cannot easily be re-created in the film. I agree with coprophage7 about Liv Tyler, as much as she is pretty and a good actress she does not fit the role. I would much prefer most of the actors to be totally unknown. Sorry, Gwenyth Paltrow would do the job as Galadriel or Arwen..... Charming Humble Hobbit

Gothmoga

09-05-2000, 03:21 PM

The Movie will not compete with the books in our affections or our addictions,the best movie screen is in the mind anyhow,what the Movie will possibly accomplish to us Tolks'is a sense of realism,it will add the SOUND of the Rauros and the noise of the Oliphant,the thing I dread most is a mass marketing strategy,,Bilbo dolls and plastic Saurons. Grrroan "They come slowly forth and Glare." <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Creating a Simple link</TITLE></HEAD><A HREF="http://pub23.ezboard.com/bminasmorgul">Minas Morgul,</A></BODY></HTML>

dogtrot

09-05-2000, 08:34 PM

Re: my thought on the movies yes i fear i may be tempted to eat at taco bell in order to get my free aragorn cup. or i can go to kentucky fried chicken and get the poseable arwen doll. at least this will make a good chew toy for my dog.

galpsi

09-05-2000, 09:33 PM

Re: my thought on the movies You shouldn't give chicken to dogs; they can easily choke on fine bone splinters.

dogtrot

09-06-2000, 11:27 AM

Re: my thought on the movies i meant the poseable arwen doll. i would never feed my dogs fast food , i on the other hand can not go a week without a cheeseburger.

galpsi

09-06-2000, 02:22 PM

Re: my thought on the movies "I will give you two Arwen dolls tomorrow for an Arwen doll today."

The Barrow-Wight

09-06-2000, 03:32 PM

Re: my thought on the movies How Wimpy can you get? The Barrow-Wight (RKittle) I usually haunt <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com">The Barrow-Downs</a> and The Barrow-Downs <a href="http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi">Middle-Earth Discussion Board</a>.

gamegie

09-06-2000, 08:31 PM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? I am the only one here for not particularly liking Liv Tyler as Arwen ? Charming Humble Hobbit

Mister Underhill

09-06-2000, 10:55 PM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? Ugh. Liv Tyler. Why not bring in Denise Richardson to play Galadriel while we're at it? Sure, she can't act, but she does have... other assets. But as others have said elsewhere on the board, I think I'll be able to live with her. Just keep Ben Affleck out of it. That's all I ask. Ideally, I'd like to see a cast of relative unknowns in the lead roles, but I think they've done a pretty good job all things considered. Elijah Wood looks convincing to me as Frodo in the trailer, and he's a good actor, too. I'm more worried about Sean Astin as Samwise. If Liv is bad, you can just grit your teeth and bear it; I don't think she'll be on-screen that much. But Astin has a pivotal role and if he doesn't nail Sam, it could really bring the whole trilogy down.

galpsi

09-06-2000, 11:30 PM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? With the exception of Boyd as Pippin, I'd argue that all the pricipals are too young and too cute. (No, no, not McKellen, Lee, Holm, or Hill, you know who I mean.) Bean as Boromir looks about right -- far more appropriate than that hunky underwear-model type they've got for Aragorn. And I'm quite content with the look and the talent of John Rhys-Davies. Dwarves are Welsh, right?

Mister Underhill

09-07-2000, 12:00 AM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? Viggo Mortenson (aka Aragorn, aka that hunky underwear model stud) is a good piece of casting, in my book. He has an unusual mixture of toughness, inscrutability, intelligence, and intensity. Check him out as the Navy SEAL D.I. in G.I. Jane. He can play the good guy with an edge.

galpsi

09-08-2000, 01:08 AM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? Fair enough, MU, I was just judging his face. But can you recommend something else for me to see him in. I can't abide the former Mrs. Willis.

Gothmoga

09-08-2000, 03:48 AM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? If Viggo why not add Dolph? after all the dolls will be cheaper,one body with interchangeable heads..but Bean is def'superior casting as Boromir,thats the doll I want,,three arwens for a Boromir anyone?? "They come slowly forth and Glare." <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Creating a Simple link</TITLE></HEAD><A HREF="http://pub23.ezboard.com/bminasmorgul">Minas Morgul,</A></BODY></HTML>

Mister Underhill

09-08-2000, 12:00 PM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? I feel your pain, galpsi, but I would stick with Jane to get the best read on how appropriate VM is for Aragorn. He’s also in "Crimson Tide", the submarine movie, as the Weapons Officer who gets caught in the middle between Denzel and Hackman’s conflicting orders on firing the sub’s nukes, and in “A Perfect Murder”, but I’d avoid that one even more than G.I. Jane, which is directed by Ridley Scott and so is not without some redeeming value. He’s in a few others, but they’re mostly smaller parts or ones I haven’t seen and can’t speak to. In Jane, his Master Chief is stern and tough, but not without compassion. I think of the scene at the Prancing Pony when Aragorn has to yell at the Hobbits to get them to see how serious the situation is. Isn't Dolph already committed to a He-Man sequel?

galpsi

09-09-2000, 10:15 PM

Re: What is with the Arwen dolls ? Thanks for taking the trouble to give me the bad news personally. Maybe I'll be lucky and the movie won't be available locally on DVD. Then I'll just take your word for it.

Lady Eowyn

09-14-2000, 01:56 PM

Re: What are your thought on the movies? I'm really looking forward to see the movies. Especially because my husband can't run away from it anymore. He refuses to read the books. The only thing I'm not gonna like is the hole Arwen as Warrior thing. But to say the hole story short I'm dying to see those movies. Edited by: <A HREF=http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_profile&u=00000065>Lady Eowyn</A> Edited by: 9/14/00 4:10:11 pm

Mister Underhill

09-14-2000, 08:30 PM

Re: What are your thought on the movies? Great to see you in the forum, Lady E! Well met! Why Faramir doesn't want to read the books, I can't imagine (maybe he feels slighted by his relatively small amount of "screen time"?), but keep on posting anyway. Edited by: <A HREF=http://www.barrowdowns.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_profile&u=00000005>Mister Underhill</A> Edited by: 9/17/00 12:00:27 am

JesTheJade

09-18-2000, 10:47 AM

Hullo There! Hullo Everyone! I as well am nearly busting at the seems waiting for this movie!! A whole year?? But I am fairly new at all of this. I just read The Hobbit this summer and am currently smack dab in the middle of The Two Towers right now! It is wonderful!! I have met a lot of people who read these books when they were kids and therefore don't have very much interest in them. I guess it's because they seem like kid books to them having read them when they did. I am glad I am just now reading them. However, I read A Wrinkle in Time, which really is more a kids book, in the 5th grade and just recently went back and read it. It was great! Okay, I guess I've rambled enough, so I'll just ramble on... It's good to be here! P.S. Lady E...I'm sorry to hear about your hubby...talk some sense into the man!! Jes <a href="mailto: GrahamTheGrey@aol.com"> GrahamTheGrey@aol.com</a>

coprophage7

09-18-2000, 10:54 AM

Marketing woes.... Ah marketing, the great sparkle take away-er. I now feel worried about this whole movie-deal because I, like others, don't like the idea of excessive TLOTR products. It makes things so commercial, and, stuff, and..... I'm too disgruntled to think. I guess I can sum it up this way (forgive the following name-dropping): This little kid I used to babysit was having his birthday and I went to the Warner Brothers store to get him some Pokemon cards, because I had been watching him for five years and wanted to get him something. I walked in and was greeted by a barrage of Harry Potter stuff. I felt so horrible that they (Product-makers) took such a great children's book series and commercialized it. Quite an odd feeling I know I'll get again when TLOTR comes out.

JesTheJade

09-18-2000, 11:46 AM

Re: Marketing woes.... I hear ya, cop. In fact, with nothing to do with the movie, I believe that there are already many toys and figures dealing with the Lord of the Rings out there. I know I have heard of a Bilbo figurine that comes with a green blanket with a white tree on it. We have no idea why...for my part, all I remember Bilbo having was that green hood and cloak. But a white tree? Nah... Anyway, you can probably expect plenty of merchandise (unfortunately) on the movie. Figurines galore, I'm sure with plenty of Orc ones for kids to fight using their Gandalf and Aragorn figurines....oh boy... Jes <a href=mailto:GrahamTheGrey@aol.com>GrahamTheGrey@aol.com</a>

quam

09-19-2000, 11:58 AM

okay,but after all,some 2 months after the film release,all that merchandise stuff will be gone,but a lot of people will have seen the film and started reading the books,which is certainly a good thing, and for that I'm willing to endure those stupid dolls and warriors and other idiot things.

JesTheJade

09-19-2000, 12:18 PM

Re: okay,but I hear ya, quam. Not only will there be more people reading the books, but perhaps even more folk will wander to the Barrow Downs and join in our discussions! I can't wait for the movies! Jes I usually watch over <a href=http://www.barrowdowns.com>The Barrow Downs</a> and <a href=http://pub8.ezboard.com/bthelotrmoviesite>The White Council Discussion Board</a>. <a href=mailto:GrahamTheGrey@aol.com>GrahamTheGrey@aol.com</a>

Arvedui

05-07-2003, 12:11 PM

In retrospect, what are your thoughts post Fellowship and Two Towers?And what do you think of and say to folks who have seen the movies, and then read the books and ask "Where's Arwen? Where's the elves at Helms Deep?"[ May 07, 2003: Message edited by: Arvedui ]

The Only Real Estel

05-08-2003, 07:04 PM

You say, "The books were written first, so pay attention to them, not the movies." I thought PJ did a pretty good job on the movies, but of course I would've liked to have a few changes.

Liriodendron

05-08-2003, 08:58 PM

You say, "That's how they did it in the movie, but the books are different. You should read them, they're great!"

aragornreborn

05-15-2003, 03:40 PM

Well, I saw the movies first and then read the books. And I absolutely loved them. And even I whine at PJ and company for all the times they departed form the book! I do like the movies a whole lot, too. They are fantastic. But I like the books even more and don't feel that movies harmed my perception of LOTR in any way. Although, TTT the movie was rather disturbing. I did read all of them before I saw TTT, and for that I'm glad because they messed with a lot more in that one.