sorry. work...work was awesome...
right, in keeping with our late seer's wishes:
++malkatoj
ok that's done, let's get down to business.
and first for business, as sleepy ranger appears to be chief prosecutor, i will adress this to him. can i take it that most of your argument comes from post 217? because i think that a very shaky arguement (no offence, but i do have somethink for each point).
you seem to think there is some kind of discontenuity between the first post (you don't give the number, and i don't know it), and teh second statemen aobut random voting. let me first say i am very displeased by the your wording "Eonwe
states that we should vote randomly". do you think there is a better way to vote on day one. there was next to nothing known at the close of day one. even TORE voted randomly. (i will here try to anticipate your reaction of, "yes but TORE as the seer could have had inside information.) TORE never made any light of any eonwe dream, nor voiced any suspicion later on. so i think we can conclude that it was indeed a random vote.
Kitanna - Eonwe link? i don't think she was ever really suspicios of me (or anyone, poor soul didn't last long enough).
I certainly never felt anything from her. It is kind of hard for anyone to hit too near teh target on DAy one...
on to your next point, this one is even more disappointing. i think you quite take it out of context. Bergil was saying nothing of either my innocence or guilt. the comment was voicing suspicoin of none other that
you my friend, based on your comment about me. i guess i should quote in full the post...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bergil
The Phantom would be proud appearing so much in a game he isn't in. I will cast my vote for
++Sleepy Ranger
this is partly for self-preservation I admit, but people don't seem to think Fea is guilty (I'm not even so sure anymore), he might be a wolf and, 1 muinate after he recieved his 1st vote, he responded to Eonwe's innocent statement of
Quote:
:
sometimes i hate werewolf.
turning it into a freudian slip
|
:
Only sometimes? Hmmm... Do you mean to say that you like or support the werewolves at other times?
and for the analytical line, I just didn't know if he usually acted that way |
as for the very end, i don't think that is that important. apperently, you are taking this entirely wrong. you seem to think that i am just figuring out that TORE is not the ranger. no. how could i have know. you have to take someone at their word when the real ranger doesn't raise their hand. (if im not reading waht you are saying right, please let me know. but im sure i can give you something for that, too
) waht i was really saying was, if TORE was a wolf, we are screwed. fortunately he wasn't.
all in all, i think you take most of my word out of context or twist them. if you hadn't provided such compilling evidence that TORE knew of your innocents, i would highly suspect you. sigh....