WWJ I: A New Saga, A New Beginning... Or Is IT!?!?!?

[Eonwe]

sorry. work...work was awesome...

right, in keeping with our late seer's wishes:

++malkatoj

ok that's done, let's get down to business.

and first for business, as sleepy ranger appears to be chief prosecutor, i will adress this to him. can i take it that most of your argument comes from post 217? because i think that a very shaky arguement (no offence, but i do have somethink for each point).

you seem to think there is some kind of discontenuity between the first post (you don't give the number, and i don't know it), and teh second statemen aobut random voting. let me first say i am very displeased by the your wording "Eonwe states that we should vote randomly". do you think there is a better way to vote on day one. there was next to nothing known at the close of day one. even TORE voted randomly. (i will here try to anticipate your reaction of, "yes but TORE as the seer could have had inside information.) TORE never made any light of any eonwe dream, nor voiced any suspicion later on. so i think we can conclude that it was indeed a random vote.

Kitanna - Eonwe link? i don't think she was ever really suspicios of me (or anyone, poor soul didn't last long enough). I certainly never felt anything from her. It is kind of hard for anyone to hit too near teh target on DAy one...

on to your next point, this one is even more disappointing. i think you quite take it out of context. Bergil was saying nothing of either my innocence or guilt. the comment was voicing suspicoin of none other that you my friend, based on your comment about me. i guess i should quote in full the post...

Originally Posted by Bergil

The Phantom would be proud appearing so much in a game he isn't in. I will cast my vote for

++Sleepy Ranger

this is partly for self-preservation I admit, but people don't seem to think Fea is guilty (I'm not even so sure anymore), he might be a wolf and, 1 muinate after he recieved his 1st vote, he responded to Eonwe's innocent statement of

:
Only sometimes? Hmmm... Do you mean to say that you like or support the werewolves at other times?

and for the analytical line, I just didn't know if he usually acted that way

as for the very end, i don't think that is that important. apperently, you are taking this entirely wrong. you seem to think that i am just figuring out that TORE is not the ranger. no. how could i have know. you have to take someone at their word when the real ranger doesn't raise their hand. (if im not reading waht you are saying right, please let me know. but im sure i can give you something for that, too ) waht i was really saying was, if TORE was a wolf, we are screwed. fortunately he wasn't.

all in all, i think you take most of my word out of context or twist them. if you hadn't provided such compilling evidence that TORE knew of your innocents, i would highly suspect you. sigh....

[Eonwe]

ok here's how it breaks down for me:

Eonwe: I know im innocent. i count sr's suspicions as baseless, and a bit offending, considering how much was taken out of context.


Feanor of the Peredhil: Um, waht are you now? the ranger? right, right, gotcha. obviously innocent.


Jack (aka Folwren): obviously innocent. saved by ranger = innocent.


Hiriel: not much to go on. could go either way.


Malkatoj: wolf


Rune Son of Bjarne: not much to go on. could go either way.


Sleepy Ranger: he put forth a pretty convinsing argument for his innocence. all the same, i don't like the way he attacked me. i think an innocent would have used much sounder logic.


Thinlomien: well now. i don't rigtly know.


so, i would council looking primarily into Hiriel, Rune, and i think i'll keep Sleepy Ranger on the table for now.

It really is too bad that TORE couldn't tell us all his dreams before he died. that would narrow the scope considerablely...

[Rune Son of Bjarne]

Since we have not been able to get a good discution going today and find the last wolf. I will do as the rest and vote ++Malkatoj

The reason i am suspecting Thinlomien (and others) again is that the ones i thought might be guilty was Malkatoj, Jack and Gurthang.

Gurthang we killed

Jack it cannot be

Malkatoj we are going to kill

were does that leave me ?

Keep in mind that i am no genius at analysing what people say and do. I am no TOREstel !

P.S. Is this transforming in to a TOREstel cult ? Cool, count me in.

[Folwren]

Okay, guys, I hope TORE knew what he was talking about. I don't need to vote...Malk is dying tonight without question.

I don't have much to say, either. I read the posts and have come up with the conclusion that the other wolf (assuming that Malk really is the guilty one) is probably Eonwe. However, I'm not one hundred percent sure. No one is, in fact. We still have tomorrow (Sunday) and the next DAY (Monday) to research her posts (and others) and see what things turn out to be.

Eonwe...your defenses for yourseld don't help your case much. You saying that an innocent will come up with more convincing arguments is bogus. People can only go what they have, even if they don't have much. (See my post against SP.)

One thing - we must all be careful about who our Hunter is.........

-- Jack

[Eonwe]

Originally Posted by jack

Eonwe...your defenses for yourseld don't help your case much. You saying that an innocent will come up with more convincing arguments is bogus. People can only go what they have, even if they don't have much. (See my post against SP.)

That's true. you can't completely make something up and expect it to hold water. and every thought counts. But ask yourself, "What is a wolf up to right now." Ask yourself, "waht is an innocent up to?" if i was answering those quetions, i would say, "a wolf it trying to throw suspicion around. an innocent is trying to get to the bottom of the matter." i think sp's points against me were nought but slinging of suspicion. NOTE: AS FAR AS IM CONSERNED, SR IS PRETTY MUCH IN THE CLEAR, DUE TO HIS POINTS ABOUT TOREstel. but can you at least see how there isn't much substance behind SR's accusations? (and how an accusation without substance is more wolfish than innocent?)

[Hiriel]

But ask yourself, "What is a wolf up to right now." Ask yourself, "waht is an innocent up to?" if i was answering those quetions, i would say, "a wolf it trying to throw suspicion around. an innocent is trying to get to the bottom of the matter." i think sp's points against me were nought but slinging of suspicion. NOTE: AS FAR AS IM CONSERNED, SR IS PRETTY MUCH IN THE CLEAR, DUE TO HIS POINTS ABOUT TOREstel.

Eonwe, quit while you're behind. You're contradicting yourself. If you think SR is throwing suspicion around and acting wolfishly, how can you put him in the clear, even though he has the endorsement of TORE? (btw, Rune, I totally agree. This game has turned into the TOREstel cult of late.)

"One thing - we must all be careful about who our Hunter is.........

Herm. I agree. The hunter's slunk below the radar this whole game. But really, I think all the hunter has to know is not to kill Feanor or Jack or SR or the proven innocents. The rest of them are fair game, and it'll have to rely on the hunter's judgement. By keeping our hunter in the shadows, he or she's more likely to get a wolf now that we're down to so few villagers.

[Eonwe]

i can't quit! especially when your not tellng the whole story. quote the last two sentences and put the "pretty much" in, please!

what im trying to say is that, if it wasn't for a weird type accusation, SR would be in teh clear. he does put forth some nice evidence. but (in my mind) it is A BIT counterbalanced by some not quite clear behavior. let me be quite explisit (this is what i've been trying to say the whole time): Sleepy Ranger checks out except for a bit of strange behaviour (ie, falty accusations). If i could clear that up, everything is good.

I hope that makes things clearer. I don't think i contradicted myself in saying that someone is looking innocent, exept for one small bit, did i.

[The Perky Ent]

TIME!


Expect Malkatoj's Death shortly!