Lommy's posts yesterDay have been talked of enough, so here's what she said today. She has very limited time, let's see how she spent it.
First
She comments about people being snappy and edgy, when at the same time we are doing fine. I already said how suspicious I find this.
Her comment about the non-kill is classically lommyish, but does not really further our cause.
Second
She says a cunning and bold wolf might have voted like
Six did. Doesn't this imply that a cunning and bold wolf would have voted the way
Lommy herself voted, too? Yet she said the things I said about her made her raise an eyebrow (without explanation why). If I'm oversimplifying things, then at least I'm not aware of this.
Quote:
|
What has happened to Gil??? I quite like his new self, and would not like voting him right now without strong judgement.
|
I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Did I miss something?
Gil is more outspoken than he used to be (praise Eru!), why is she putting talk about voting him in there?
She's suspicious of
tgwbs and will look at him closer.
There's also some good advice for
Six and some joking. All nice, but isn't time pressing us?
Third
Brinniel - innocent: agreement here
Gil - again, says she likes his way, but immediately talks about lynching him again, even though she says she doesn't want to. I'm sorry, but this leaves a sneaky impression with me.
Legate - funny, yes, but I have no idea how she got there.
Me - hasty and edgy? I don't know about hasty, but I'm sure I've been more edgy in some past games.
Mith - puts her in the middle zone, but somehow this one feels
really sneaky
Nogrod - she made up her mind about
Roa's analysis and apparently decided to dismiss it.
Rikae - nothing
Roa - she decided not to like
Roa's analysis, that's ok. She still believes
Roa to be innocent, that's ok, too.
tgwbs - bad case against her, deliberately misunderstanding
Roa,
Roa makes good points against him: this is all not inherently suspicious, but, lacking a better word right now, hasty.
Six - innocentish, but unsure: this is interpretable in both ways
Xyzzy - nothing, of course
Her conclusion:
tgwbs or
me, maybe
Mith or
Legate
Fourth
She votes
tgwbs for his bad case against her. Just because it's not unexpected now, it doesn't mean it's not retaliation.
Quote:
|
He seems very edgy/jumpy too.
|
Yes, he does! But that does not necessarily point towards wolvishness. More often, in fact, it points towards the opposite.
Well,
Lommy's posts today do not cry wolf, but also aren't model-innocentish by far. I did not encounter one thing that made me feel more easy about her than before. If she is evil, then her behaviour fits seamlessly. If I had a better suspect today, I would go with that one, but I don't. Unless something strange happens, I will vote
Lommy today.
This makes three votes for
Lommy now. I'm really interested in seeing what rivaling bandwaggon will appear against
Lommy's.
PS: I suggest that those who spill the milk shall have to drink it.
edit: crossed with Brinn