![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Fading Fëanorion
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: into the flood again
Posts: 2,911
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lommy's posts yesterDay have been talked of enough, so here's what she said today. She has very limited time, let's see how she spent it.
First She comments about people being snappy and edgy, when at the same time we are doing fine. I already said how suspicious I find this. Her comment about the non-kill is classically lommyish, but does not really further our cause. Second She says a cunning and bold wolf might have voted like Six did. Doesn't this imply that a cunning and bold wolf would have voted the way Lommy herself voted, too? Yet she said the things I said about her made her raise an eyebrow (without explanation why). If I'm oversimplifying things, then at least I'm not aware of this. Quote:
She's suspicious of tgwbs and will look at him closer. There's also some good advice for Six and some joking. All nice, but isn't time pressing us? Third Brinniel - innocent: agreement here Gil - again, says she likes his way, but immediately talks about lynching him again, even though she says she doesn't want to. I'm sorry, but this leaves a sneaky impression with me. Legate - funny, yes, but I have no idea how she got there. Me - hasty and edgy? I don't know about hasty, but I'm sure I've been more edgy in some past games. Mith - puts her in the middle zone, but somehow this one feels really sneaky Nogrod - she made up her mind about Roa's analysis and apparently decided to dismiss it. Rikae - nothing Roa - she decided not to like Roa's analysis, that's ok. She still believes Roa to be innocent, that's ok, too. tgwbs - bad case against her, deliberately misunderstanding Roa, Roa makes good points against him: this is all not inherently suspicious, but, lacking a better word right now, hasty. Six - innocentish, but unsure: this is interpretable in both ways Xyzzy - nothing, of course Her conclusion: tgwbs or me, maybe Mith or Legate Fourth She votes tgwbs for his bad case against her. Just because it's not unexpected now, it doesn't mean it's not retaliation. Quote:
Well, Lommy's posts today do not cry wolf, but also aren't model-innocentish by far. I did not encounter one thing that made me feel more easy about her than before. If she is evil, then her behaviour fits seamlessly. If I had a better suspect today, I would go with that one, but I don't. Unless something strange happens, I will vote Lommy today. This makes three votes for Lommy now. I'm really interested in seeing what rivaling bandwaggon will appear against Lommy's. PS: I suggest that those who spill the milk shall have to drink it. ![]() edit: crossed with Brinn |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|