Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kuru
I think the newbie/veteran discussion is in its own way less helpful than the quiet/loud discussion. At least the quiet/loud discussion is focusing on the actions (or lack thereof) of the players and not how long they’ve been around. I don’t think how long a player has been around has anything to do with what one should do at all. I meant it when I said that if somebody thinks another player is acting like a wolf then you should vote for them regardless of other considerations.
|
I did not spot any newbie/veteran discussion here this far. In fact, the first one who is speculating what effect it has if someone is a newbie (with the response: no effect) is you. If you are thinking about what I was saying about your response to
Nerwen (and what
Fea was asking then), it was only an illustration I used and I did not speculate about it. So let's not
start on that topic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
Looks double-lynch-dangerous. But since nobody wants one and the wolves probably won't dare to initiate one, it could only happen within the last minute voting craze. I would herewith like to disencourage said craze.
|
All right. I'm probably voting
Nerwen, mainly for the reason stated above (reaction to
Kuru, defensiveness, her retaliatory vote). Just at the moment it seems that it would be a double, so I only am checking in if there is at least one more person around now who would vote the same.