View Single Post
Old 08-15-2008, 10:45 AM   #11
Mansun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitanna View Post
But the ability to gain power like that can make a good politician. Power hungry or not Saruman would have made a better politician than Gandalf. Many distrusted Gandalf. The Hobbits found him a disturber of the peace, Grima, with Saruman's help, had Rohan convinced he was Stormcrow, Denethor was never thrilled with his presence. And it didn't bother him. He could be hated as long as he got the job done. As far as politicians go that's not what they want to strive for. Saruman and Sauron are both far superior as politicians. They could bend themselves into looking fair so people would follow them. Being a politician involves getting people to follow and support you, regardless of the ends. Gandalf was unbending in his ways and that makes a poor politician.


He convinced Gandalf not to act on the Ring issue in the Shire. And Gandalf followed as if Saruman was a politician because he trusted Saruman's leadership.
You liken deception and persuasion with achievement. Personally, I would not. Gandalf had his doubts on this subject all along.

Ganadlf was not liked, at times, during the war against Sauron. But who ran out as comfortable triumphant at the end, more liked as ever before? Aragorn would have made him the chief advisor to Gondor, if he could.
  Reply With Quote