Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollum the Great
For what seems the 800th time I got distracted or something and didn't post what I typed up. I'm not holding up to my obligations to this game very well. I'll try to finish this analysis quick.
|
It's just that I made an enormous
Mac analysis yesterday.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
I didn't know your exact role, nor really your innocence, I was just going to give you a good defense today.
|
Aww thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwathagor
Mac's persistent support of a double-lynch yesterDay seems odd to me, given the disastrous consequences of the previous double-lynch. I realize that tgwbs had listed both Fea and Aganzir under "most guilty," but I don't think that would have been enough reason to lynch both. The potential pay-off did not outweigh the potential negative consequences.
|
Now you're quick to change your mind
Gwath. Yesterday after
Gollum had said it was a risk worth taking you ended up voting for me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gwath
Aganzir - how does your soulmate-vengeance-kill work exactly?
|
Ah it is a crime of passion. I can kill
anyone, even the divo... Which is why I'm not entirely comfortable with my role because with my luck the person I decide to kill is indeed xem. And I can kill whenever I want, but only once.
I don't care how openly I speak about my kill as it's most likely committed during this day anyway, which means the critics are probably going to scare me to death in the night.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gwath
it seems I was making the Mac/double-lynch thing into more of an issue than I should have, since Mac basically ended up agreeing, at the end of the Day, that it wasn't worth it.
|
Only after I had made a really big show that the critics would have been the only ones who had benefited from a double lynch. I think he voted
Fea in the end only because there was no chance he could get us double lynched, though.