Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin
I think you should be asking Sally that question, because I have no idea.
|
Which question?
Please mate, this is not the first time. What are you referring to? You can't think others will run through the whole thread to find out what are you asking to answer your questions...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
You seem to be fixated on the fact that Sally's claim to be the Seer is absolute proof of her guilt
|
You don't seem to read the thread now do you? I have said this maybe ten times and this will be the last one.
An ordo pretending to be the seer to save the real one would not place another player into danger by claiming she's a wolf. That's far from absolute, but a fairer deduction than some others.
Had she made her list like this:
Quote:
Okay, so here's what I know.
Brinn: innocent
Nog: innocent
Legate: wolf
XXX: innocent
|
I might have believed her trying to help. But now in the place of the XXX she had
Lhuna as a wolf which she can't know as she's no seer.
So she wanted to get
Lhuna lynched although she didn't know what she is. That is no innocent behaviour.
Lhuna maybe a fellow baddie and this is all an opera trying to fool us. But it's
Sally we should lynch first as she's the one who clearly lies / tries to fool us. We should consider
Lhuna after that.
If you don't understand this argument now, then don't.
Off to bed.