My mother's lasagna is cutting my reading short, so I only got to the first few posts of page 4. But here is what I had quoted and my thoughts:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
What I don't like is our chance of getting an un-dreamed wolf in the early part of the game.
|
This sentence doesn't make sense to me, and it's fishy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinniel
Oh and Glirdan, did they really lynch you on Day 1 last game? I remember there were a few who joked about lynching you Day 1, but I didn't think they'd actually do it. Meanies.  |
He was actually Hunter killed Day 1, not lynched, haha, poor kid, worst luck...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
Hopefully a Seer-reveal will be entirely unnecessary. But if someone did vote for a wolf obtained from a Seer dream, they'd be in the hot seat, no matter their excuse.
|
First sentence is what I'm looking at. And this may get me alot of scrutiny but a Seer is really only useful if they've revealed. I mean a Seer could dream of 3 wolves and then die before saying anything, and then what good were their dreams? Unless they left really awesome hints, but even those can be hard to catch and are risky, especially if the dream was for a wolf. So a Seer reveal is actually almost necessary for them to be helpful. Yeah, it's way better later on in the game then on Day 1 when they've only have one dream, but to be "entirely unnecessary" is kind of rediculous, it's actually usually necessary at some point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
Would it be skirting and or bending the rules, if we had a bigway tie for toDay, and thus no one would go to the noose?
|
No idea why she made such a suggestion. Lynching is all we have, of course we want it to happen, even if we don't get a wolf it's better then not trying. Considering the number of Fenris wolves out there it's obviously possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eönwë
If we do have a system of showing who we want to lynch, it draws attention away from those in who aren't in the list and who have only received a few votes of confidence. It means that these people may be able to last for quite a few days with only a few votes and remain undetected. Of course, we'll still have the same problem now, but now no-one who isn't voted is safe and have to work to gain the village's confidence, but if we do the lynch-thing, people that aren't on there will be "safe" and will probably not be looked at as much as those under suspicion.
|
But it's not like everyone will vote for the same people every day. suspicions changed, I mean 10 minutes ago I had no opinion on quite a few people, and now I'm suddenly paranoid about a bunch of you. So I doubt people could skim through as easily as you think. Also, I don't get why you fought
Nog's suggestion so hard,
Pitch did as well but I think
Eonwe took it a bit too far. It really was not that big of a deal.
*breathes*
Gonna stop now and go eat, I'll be back later. I will try and get out of this foul mood I seem to have landed in.
x'ed with nog, oh and the underlining is mine..