Let me put my pondering hat on. It's been too long since I've had the chance to do this, and I might be out of shape.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Inzil
I see this as having more benefit for the committee members. Innocents (other then the Eavesdropper) won't know anyone else's role. So what do you say? If you're honest about a suspicion or whatnot, you risk giving the committee something they could use. If you're deliberately deceitful, you could be doing a disservice to a fellow innocent.
On the other hand, the baddies could simply use the opportunity to further their own ends, with little worry.
Thoughts on this?
|
Well, it's more information than you had, which is always useful. And if what you're given doesn't jibe with posted positions, it lets you know something might be up. I wouldn't trust it implicitly, but it's definitely a tool that can be used to learn things.
Whether or not the things you learn are what the messager wants you to, that's between the two of you.