Tol-in-Gaurhoth XLIX - At the Source of Darkness

[Nerwen]

the phantom –I've been inclined to believe him innocent throughout the game, but that's partly because he seems to think along the same lines as me. As he says himself, he's probably clever enough to guess what I'm thinking and fake it.

Durelin –Feels rather evil... but she always does, to me. Her weak suspicions of me on previous Days could be a wolf seeing if she could start something... but then her explanation toDay makes sense (or is it a case of, "well, she would say that, wouldn't she?"). She has made some useful suggestions, like (after Nilp) warning gifteds to ignore false reveals... and she was the first person to suggest Mith might be a cobbler. [conspiracy theory: phantom-wolf and Wolfelin picked Mith as a cobbler, all right, and killed her as a double-bluff.]

Lommy –seems fair, votes foul. Bad luck... or something more?

Kath –Has been on my hit-list since her interesting post on Day Three. (The one where she theorises than the Seer dreamed a wolf each Night and chose not to give any clear indication.)

Shasta –After re-reading his posts, he comes across even more strongly as a cobbler (and would-be lynchee)... which we now know he isn't. So– a cobbler-impersonating wolf? Or a disaffected ordo, embittered by what happened to him last time? Has he had one of those mysterious insights that wildcard players seem to get?

EDIT: X'd with phantom and Durelin.