Game Thread: Werewolf- this time it's real!

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by A Little Green

What you say makes sense in a way, but I think you are overlooking a very important thing. If the wolves all kept their bonus votes to themselves and Night-killed every innocent having bonus votes left, it wouldn't be right hard to identify them, would it?

Basically that's exactly what I'm after: I'm driving towards identifying them...

Are you for letting them to be concealed?

And so, with pressure enough they would need to discard their votes as not to be identified... and we would be in less a danger.

Simple, but soo hard to do in practise.

But we really have this Day to stay with a chance to win this. Three wolves and a Grima with ten votes each (+ Thuringwethil with ten extra-votes) will just spell the end of this game already toMorrow.


I'm amazed how few of you seem to get this. It's the end, finito, finé, konéc, kaputt, das ende, slut, loppu... if we leave three to five people with ten votes after toDay and lynch an innocent.

Maybe it's then what we deserve as a "village"...

I'm still not sure I get this point. If we kill someone today chiefly based on that person having 10 bonus votes left, and that person turns out to be innocent, then in what sort of situation does that leave us?

Bad one. We need to get a baddie toDay.

Granted, villagers might not agree about who is guilty, but if we have innocents with bonus votes we'll at least have a chance of opposing the wolves on a decisive Day. If we go about lynching innocents with 10 bonus votes left, we don't have even that.

Yeah. Sadly we don't seem to have the luxury of just pointing out the actual baddie like that and then go at her/him collectively. But the baddies both know who they are with and they can PM all the time to adjust their tactics when the situations change.

And even if we had an innocent or two with ten extra votes the wolves can just wait how they vote and then PM a strategy to counter it with their annihiliatory number of votes they have.

Sorry if I feel like pressuring this but I really think this is a question of winning or losing.

No, I don't propose anything like "let's systematically give away an X number of votes". No. The wolves could hide too easily under that kind of common decision.

Let's keep up the feeling that those not ready to use their votes will be the ones from whom we'll pick our lynch and see what happens.

It doesn't exactly help the plan if you all come back here to disagree with it with your underlying concerns about your personal safety.

Let's make the threat real. Only then will the wolves need to consider using their votes - and thence lose some of their power.

Otherwise they will outwit us in no time.

You may think it's no problem as it's only Day3. Sorry, this might be decided on Day4.

That spells toMorrow.

[Nogrod]

An addendum

Originally Posted by Greenie

If we kill someone today chiefly based on that person having 10 bonus votes left

No! I'm not suggesting we should base our votes "chiefly" on the fact that s/he has ten votes left. I say we pick the most suspicious of the "ten-voters".

It's pretty hard to believe - if not totally impossible - that all the baddies would have used some of their extra-votes already. They would be lousy wolves indeed.

It's perfectly possible one wolf has used some of her/his extras but I would be very surprised if two had done that. I think they've had quite an easy ride this far so why would they have botherered - when most of you seem to oppose my scheme of forcing them to use their votes and there is a crowd to blend in...

[Isabellkya]

Well yes, but why suck votes if you don't plan on using them?

X'd with Green.

[Isabellkya]

Indeed I have played with you.

Forgive me for being blunt - but your lists looks like a load of crap with some sugar on it, made to look pretty but taste gross.


You say the list is going to change, then you say it is on a hunch which you hope is a good one. WHy would you want the good hunch to change?

[satansaloser2005]

Originally Posted by Isabellkya

Indeed I have played with you.

Forgive me for being blunt - but your lists looks like a load of crap with some sugar on it, made to look pretty but taste gross.


You say the list is going to change, then you say it is on a hunch which you hope is a good one. WHy would you want the good hunch to change?

Good. Then you know I'm usually uncertain when I'm an ordo. It's because I bloody don't know anything.


I'll have you know that Sally Suspicion Lists are a delicacy in Nebraska, thanks very much. And as for the hunch changing, I hope it's good but that doesn't mean it is, and if I'm wrong (which I often am) I'm not going to just sit and keep the same opinions as before now, am I?



(Really must dash soon, sorry.)

[Gwathagor]

Originally Posted by satansaloser2005

Good. Then you know I'm usually uncertain when I'm an ordo. It's because I bloody don't know anything.


I'll have you know that Sally Suspicion Lists are a delicacy in Nebraska, thanks very much. And as for the hunch changing, I hope it's good but that doesn't mean it is, and if I'm wrong (which I often am) I'm not going to just sit and keep the same opinions as before now, am I?

(Really must dash soon, sorry.)

This looks pretty evasive.

[A Little Green]

Gwath, if you're around plese explain why you didn't vote yesterDay. I'd love to know.