![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
I'm really not sure I trust this vote, given Nessa's overall quietness in the game, but I definitely like it. And I'm irked enough with Morm I'm inclined to go much the same way myself. Nice to see I wouldn't be alone.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT:X'd with Form.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Dead Serious
|
I think it does. If you can distinguish between a Wolf and a Bear--and you've got equal reason for thinking both--it should make a difference, insofar as it seems likely to me that you'd rather rid the village of the Bear, rather than the Wolf. At least, that's what I would think, since I'd prefer one kill per night rather than two, though I suppose it's possible you'd prefer to weaken the team players, on the hope the remaining wolf will eat the bear, or vice versa.
My point, basically, is that it would affect your vote, if you could be sure of the distinction. More likely, I suppose, it's unlikely that you'd get the "all other things being equal" end of it, and either the potential bear or the potential wolf would be a more powerful argument on its own--but not necessarily.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|