![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The best seat in the Golden Perch
Posts: 219
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Even with the best of intentions this is shaky evidence. The work existed in 3 versions: an original manuscript, a subsequent typescript and a final professional typescript (which was subsequently corrected by Tolkien), and the reference to the Witch-king's origin is only noted to have been in the manuscript. It certainly doesn't appear in Hammond & Scull's edition (aside from the early reference to the manuscript, but it's not in the work itself) (I don't have A Tolkien Compass for cross-checking). The reason for it's omission from subsequent versions could be rejection (maybe Tolkien felt it preferable to leave this matter vague), or it could be because it's not really relevant content here: it's a sign that the work was drifting away from it's original intention (to be a guide for translators) and towards introducing new story elements, after all. Even aside from that, use of the word "probably" certainly should not be read as a definite indication. So taken together the "evidence" amounts to:
__________________
Then one appeared among us, in our own form visible, but greater and more beautiful; and he said that he had come out of pity. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |