![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#22 |
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,744
![]() |
![]()
As Sharkû has mentioned, the statement “Tom is Eä or an embodiment thereof” doesn’t have much meaning. Eä is Eä. Tom is Tom. How can Tom be “the earth” or “the material universe”? And if he’s an “embodiment” of it only, again what does that mean? As the Old Man has stated, this may be said in some sense of all things: “For dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.” (Gen 3:19) There are river spirits, mountain spirits, tree spirits, rock spirits (apparently – c.f. Rimb’s reference to rock memories) – where does a generalized “embodiment of Eä” fit in to all this? What aspects of Eä does he personify?
In any case, I would add these few items which seem problematic for the theory, such as it is:
[ September 04, 2003: Message edited by: Mister Underhill ] |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |