The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-10-2003, 10:58 PM   #11
ainur
Haunting Spirit
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 72
ainur has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Would Sam have tried to push Frodo into the Crack of Doom? No. The ring would have probably played on Sam's love of Frodo to stop him and of course it would only take a slight hesitation, and Frodo would be pushing back with the power of the ring on his finger!

Or try to take the ring from Frodo? This is more likely, though still unlikely. He would not have done so to destroy it, the ring was just too strong by then, there in the very heart of Orodruin. It would not have let him. He might do so if he felt it posed a danger to Frodo (Sauron on the way, ready to punish the one who dared to claim the ring and put it on in the very heart of his realm.) He still would not have been able to destroy it.

As for the original question of this thread--Was it worth it for Sauron to make the One Ring? Yes. it was a way to diversify his power. Having one nearly indestructible Dark Lord to shoot at is hard enough. He made it twice as hard by tying his power to the Ring. It wasn't enough to destroy him anymore. You also had to destroy the Ring (which was impossible to do on purpose.)
__________________
Yet all the while I sit and think of times there were before,
I listen for returning feet and voices at the door.
ainur is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.