The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Announcements and Obituaries > Haudh-en-Ndengin
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-06-2001, 06:55 AM   #9
Shagrat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ring

<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Newly Deceased
Posts: 1
</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE>
<img src="http://www.barrowdowns.com/images/posticons/bluepal.jpg" align=absmiddle> Orcs are goblins - goblins are Orcs.

Tolkien says (in the introduction to the Hobbit), that &quot;goblin&quot; is a translation of &quot;Orc&quot;.

The idea that goblins are smaller Orcs is completely erroneous (Although in unpublished early drafts, Tolkien did toy with the idea - before inventing &quot;Uruk&quot; to indicate larger goblins).

The misunderstanding arises from two sentences - one in &quot;The Hobbit&quot; and one in LotR. In the former book, a sentence talks about &quot;even the big ones, the great Orcs of the mountains...&quot; This can be interpreted as implying that Orcs are bigger than goblins. But if the emphasis is placed on &quot;great&quot; rather than Orc, with the understanding (gleaned from the intro) that &quot;Orc&quot; and &quot;goblin&quot; are synonyms, then it doesn't indicate this at all.

The second passage is in &quot;The Two Towers&quot;, where Pippin and Merry wake up to find themselves surrounded by Orcs. They hear arguing between Ugluk, Grishnakh and the Northerners, and then see U and G standing facing each other. The text says that &quot;around them stood many smaller goblins...&quot; Now, if you stress &quot;goblins&quot; when you read, this implies that goblins are smaller creatures than Ugluk and Grishnakh. But if you emphazise &quot;smaller&quot;, you get the correct understanding - that U and G are goblins too - LARGER goblins. This is undoubtedly correct, as both Ugluk (or his severed head) and Grishnakh are described as &quot;goblins&quot; elsewhere in the text.

In fact, &quot;goblin&quot; is used to describe Saruman's Uruk-hai more than any other specific kind of Orc in LotR. As well as the description of Ugluk's severed head (or is it Mauhur's?), we also have the bodies of &quot;four goblin-soldiers of greater stature&quot;. This alone is clear proof that &quot;goblin&quot; is a synonym for &quot;Orc&quot;, as Tolkien explicitly tells us it is, rather than a term for some smaller sub-group.

By the way, the snuffling tracker in Mordor is never described as a goblin.

</p>
 
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.