Lord of the Rings: Both sides of the argument - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Essex · 12-08-2003, 10:45 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>The fact that Return of the King is part 3 of 3 should have absolutely nothing to do with it. There is no Best Trilogy category. Acknowledge this, and deal with it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>So why do we have so many Oscar 'experts' and websites mentioning exactly what you are refuting above? If the Acadamey do not think of the films as trilogies, why did they not allow the soundtrack to be nominated for the second film?

12-08-2003, 10:45 AM	#1
Essex Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Essex, England Posts: 886	<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>The fact that Return of the King is part 3 of 3 should have absolutely nothing to do with it. There is no Best Trilogy category. Acknowledge this, and deal with it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>So why do we have so many Oscar 'experts' and websites mentioning exactly what you are refuting above? If the Acadamey do not think of the films as trilogies, why did they not allow the soundtrack to be nominated for the second film?