* *A New Project ~~~ Revising the Ainulindale* *

[Antoine]

Yes, there are other footnotes in the text. But this, the comment at hand, was not a footnote.

I'm sorry, but i don't understand.

There is Ainulindale C, the full text can be found in home 10, it 's a text without footnote.

But for Ainulindale D, Christopher Tolkien explain that it 's :

a manuscript of unusual splendour, with illuminated capitals and a beautiful script

but nothing about some tapuscript that follows this manuscript.

CRT didn't write the full text but just the changes.
And he wrote about the paragraph 19 :

After 'when the vision was taken away' there is a footnote that seems to have been an early addition:
And some have said that the Vision ceased ere the fulfilment of the Dominion of Men and the fading of the Firstborn; wherefore, though the Music is over all, the Valar have not seen as with sight the Later Ages or the ending of the World. Quoth Pengoloð.

If I follow you , the

early addition

is a rejected addition.

Can you explain to me your way for this conclusion.


Regards
Antoine