Arwen's Grave Choice

[Bêthberry]

Interesting ideas, Helen.

To me, she returned to the scene where her choice sealed her fate, the return making the choice even more significant. It is as aesthetically appropriate as is Elessar's burial in Rath Dinen. And completely unique and original, nothing like Emily Bronté's end for Heathcliff and Catherine.

As John Donne once wrote, "The grave's a fine and private place but none I think do there embrace."

[davem]

Bethberry

First of all, this isn't what I wanted to say - unfortunately, its as close as I can come to saying what I want, so it will have to do, & I hope everyone can somehow pick up on what I really mean.

'Where' is Frodo? In his dream in Tom's house, he is, in a sense, both in his bed & on the ship, seeing the Undying Lands - his body is sleeping, but his mind is in a different place & time. Looked at in one way, he is always on Cerin Amroth, & always approaching the Undying Lands, always at every point in his story.

Memory is, as the Elves have it, a 'reliving' of the past, rather than a remembering of it. So, we are not speaking of looking back to something which is gone forever, but returning & being there, in full awareness.

Its like the book. We can open LotR & read of Frodo walking on Cerin Amroth whenever we choose, or read of him coming to Tol Eressea. Your quote takes that moment of him walking on Cerin Amroth out of the story & presents it to us, here, 'out of context'. So, in a sense, because the event has been described by Tolkien & set in print, Frodo is 'always' there, 'always' walking on Cerin Amroth. Aragorn never comes back to Cerin Amroth in the story, as a living man, yet he is 'always' there, with Arwen.

How shall we understand Arwen's 'return' to Cerin Amroth - as a bald statement of fact - she went back to Lorien? Should we not rather understand that she returned in spirit to that time with Aragorn, & only physically went to a deserted Lorien? When she dies physically, where is she spiritually? Still there, still with him?

I don't think we need to resort to ghosts returning to their old 'haunts' Aragorn, Arwen, Frodo, all of them, are eternally in every moment of their 'story', & always will be.

[Child of the 7th Age]

Davem,

I have no problem viewing time and spirit in the way that you have described.

This is preferable, I believe, to populating Middle-earth with "ghosts"....

~Child

[Bêthberry]

Child and davem,

Hey, I'm no ghost-buster.

I think there is a confusion simply of words here. I never used the word ghost, although Helen did. And my point in referring to these passages in the Lothlorien chapter is not to argue their metaphysical meaning but rather to suggest their symbolical importance.

When I referred to Frodo in "unearthly form" I was simply using my rather inglorious and clumsy way of saying what Tolkien has Aragorn say, "here my heart dwells forever."

And my point is less to expound upon Tolkien's mythology than to suggest a function for Arwen's character, a symbolic or aesthetic function rather than a psychological function.

I read this as a writer trying to get inside a story and feel what is right for each character but I take also a nod from "On Fairy Stories" where Tolkien asks, "But what of the banana skin? Our business with it really only begins when it has been rejected by historians." At the end of the following paragraph he concludes,

I wish to point to someting else that these traditions contain: a singularly suggestive example of the relation of the 'fairy-tale element' to gods and kings and nameless men, illustrating (I believe) the view that this element does not rise or fall, but it there, in the Cauldron of Story, waiting for the great figures of Myth and History, and for the yet nameless He or She, waiting for the moment when they are cast into the simmering stew, one by one or all together...

Arwen, for me, does not function as a psychologically driven character. There is simply too little given to her as a figure in the story. And, actually, I would say the same of Goldberry and Galadriel--not of Eowyn, please note. And this is in no way to demean their depiction. They are like characters out of old narrative whose purpose is to act out an idea--and by this I do not mean allegory. It seems to me absolutely fitting that the elf who choses the doom of man should, once her lover has died and is given all the rituals of the king's burial, return to the place where she made her choice and plighted her troth, particularly given the special sense of magic which Tolkien wishes the elves to represent. She returns to the heart of Elvendom. This is not for me a tenet of belief so much as of good story-telling.

My suggestion about Frodo at Cerin Amroth was designed to show how significant the site is, in terms of its importance to him, of what he understands there with Haldir's help, not to suggest that he or Aragorn linger there as spirits unwilling to leave. This is why the song about Nerindel and Amroth is important. All of this is not to deny what you have to say about the meaning within the Legendarium. For my purpose here the specific contents or the meaning within the Legendarium is not at question.

[mark12_30]

My use of the word ghost was focused on this part here:

Frodo felt that he was in a timeless land that did not fade or change or fall into forgetfulness. When he had gone and passed again into the outer world, still Frodo the wanderer from the Shire would walk there, upon the grass among elanor and niphredil in fair Lothlorien.

This strikes me more that "time is translucent" there, rather than that the place is haunted so to speak. I don't imagine Aragorn's spirit going from Gondor to Cerin Amroth and waiting for her. What I do imagine, is that Arwen might return there hoping for a glimpse through the fabric of time-- like Aragorn had as he held the flower, and said "Arwen Vanimelda, Namarie." Perhaps the word "ghost" has too many applications. A rend (or transparency, better) in the fabric of time is more what i had in mind.

[The Saucepan Man]

... or perhaps it was just that the power of the place, and in Aragorn's case its significance, was such that, when they left it, they still wandered it in their dreams and their thoughts.

~Saucepan the rationalist~

[Bêthberry]

Yes, indeed, Saucepan. Thank you for reminding us that one interpretation is not privileged over another.

~Bethberry the fabulist ~