![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#26 | ||||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Something close like Shire
Posts: 769
![]() |
![]()
Forget what I wrote earlier, here I am again! [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
I don't know what it's worth to this subject as you conceive it, davem, but here is a long list of quotes from the letter (131, To Milton Waldman) which Sophia quoted above. ([brackets] and bold texts are my alterations) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
#1: Sub-creation, as Tolkien conceived it, wasn't bounded solely on "creation of 'Secondary World' in the mind"; he used the concept in far wider scale and so should we too. #2: Sub-creation as Elves' Art is basically good but still "has various opportunities for 'Fall'". Elves', more specifically the Noldor's, Fall is a result from their sub-creative desire, which eventually led to the desire to possess, to dominate. Melkor truly knew what strings to pull for he was the first Sub-creator! #3: I would assume when facing this evidence that Tolkien didn't want to represent any of the characters of LOTR as 'Great Sub-creators', that is, as rebels against the Creator etc. The Elves' (Noldor) great subcreating acts had formerly led to their downfall: and I think they learned from that. Galadriel is an example of this: she passed her test, the temptation of the Ring (one great sub-creation in the wider context of the word, I'd say) and thus was allowed to return. And now I'll shut up.
__________________
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |