The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-14-2002, 10:20 PM   #7
Nar
Wight
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 228
Nar has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

The key to the significance of the word 'pocket' can be decoded by the use of an anagram. Rearranging the letters of 'pocket' gives ... nothing whatsoever. It is therefore necessary to cheat, QED.

Extracting the letter 'c' because all these pocket-references occur in the sightless dark, and the letter 'o' because, as the shape of the ring, it is an evil influence, we are left with 'kept', which is, as Mhoram pointed out, the crux of the problem LotR delves into: the ring was 'kept' by Isildur rather than being cast into the Cracks of Doom.

Returning to the original question, it seems clear that LotR is a treatise on the darker implications of the 'keeping safe and handy' function of the humble 'pocket'.

As a 'pickpocket', Bilbo served, not necessarily wittingly, as an opposing influence to this apparently harmless 'keeping' function: that which the pocket attempts to keep safe, your pickpocket gallantly loots. The pickpocket is thus an agent of spiritual renewal, of release from the covetousness and greed that the 'keeping' of a favorite trinket can induce, particularly if it is 'handy' and imbued with the power of a 'dark lord'.

[ September 15, 2002: Message edited by: Nar ]
Nar is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.