Which is worse? - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Laitoste · 08-08-2004, 05:04 PM

Having Arwen at Helm's Deep would be, without a doubt, much worse. She would have had no purpose there, and would have just been in the way. That entire idea was stupid and ill-conceived. But I must defend her place in rescuing Frodo (as much as I would rather have Glorfindel). Adding an extra character with no other purpose in the story (that I remember) would have most people confused. Although Frodo is perfectly capable of riding a horse and escaping Nazgul himself, thank you. With some help from the horse.

08-08-2004, 05:04 PM	#13
Laitoste Wight Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Behind the hills Posts: 164	Having Arwen at Helm's Deep would be, without a doubt, much worse. She would have had no purpose there, and would have just been in the way. That entire idea was stupid and ill-conceived. But I must defend her place in rescuing Frodo (as much as I would rather have Glorfindel). Adding an extra character with no other purpose in the story (that I remember) would have most people confused. Although Frodo is perfectly capable of riding a horse and escaping Nazgul himself, thank you. With some help from the horse. __________________ "If we're still alive in the morning, we'll know that we're not dead."~South Park