![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#33 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Aha Aiwendil, I think I begin to undestand your point of view now a bit better.
Quote:
TN -> the hunt is mentioned, treacherous Elves are included S -> the hunt is mentioned, treacherous Elves are included Q30-> the hunt is mentioned, treacherous Elves are included AB1 -> the hunt is NOT mentioned, treacherous Elves are included AB2 -> the hunt is NOT mentioned, treacherous Elves are included TY -> the hunt is NOT mentioned, treacherous Elves are EXEcluded Thus the hunt was claerly part of the story when Ab1 and Ab2 where written. These Annals were much fuller than then TY (they were been accompanied by Tale of the Year versions, which we don't have). It seems wrong to me, to execlud the hunt, only because it isn't metioned in TY which Tolkien composed clearly with AB2 or the accompanying Tale of the Year version in front of him. I see now that this is clearly otherwise for the treacherous Elves. They were included in AB2 and execluded from TY. Thus it seems that Tolkien rejected them. But Maedhros did give us the way to use the hunt without them: Quote:
Quote:
In view of the discussion, I think we are all now no longer absolutly sure about this issue. Thus I think we should find at first some common ground: - Do we all agree that Thingol had not a great host of Sindarin Elves withhim when he was killed? - If so, can we incooperat that into our version even if the hunt is not used? Respectfully Findegil |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |