![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#18 | |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
No, it doesn't work - chiefly because its impossible to imagine Gandalf, Aragorn or Elrond, et al, even contemplating such an act, let alone carrying it through. In fact, I think Gandalf, Aragorn or Elrond could easily pull apart Tolkien's argument here. Tolkien seems to be saying that, in the last resort, anything is permissible in order to defeat Evil. So, why not take the Ring & use that - if it was the last hope of defeating Sauron? Or are we to believe that only the Ring itself can totally corrupt an individual? What Tolkien is advocating here is simply wrong, & goes against the whole philosophy of LotR. One cannot use the enemy's means without becoming like the enemy. Abu Ghraib anyone? The Ring is an extreme case, not a unique one. If it was unique then LotR would not have such resonances for us. I can't help feeling Tolkien has fallen into his own trap here. Or more precisely the trap he exposed for his characters. If the West had used Sauron's methods they would have sacrificed their values & moral superiority, & become 'Sauron'. To have refused to use the Ring for fear of becoming a 'monster' like Sauron but to have behaved in every other way as if they had taken & used it, would have been the height of hypocrisy, to say the least. The reason they are in the right is that they didn't ever take the course that Tolkien is attempting to justify here. They would never have considered it. If they had considered it they would have been too vulnerable to the lure of the Ring & so 'their' cause would have had no chance of success. In short, they wouldn't have done such a thing because they didn't think that way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |