![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#28 | |
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,744
![]() |
![]()
It is a hallmark of Tolkien’s most admirable characters that they are not crippled by sentimentality. This is especially true of Aragorn and his kith and kin. They feel sorrow at misfortune and partings and the ending of good things, but they are not ruled by it. Any number of examples may be cited. Aragorn, only moments after Gandalf has fallen, quickly rallies: “Let us gird ourselves and weep no more! Come! We have a long road, and much to do.” When Aragorn laments, “Then bitter will my days be, and I will walk in the wild alone,” his mother Gilraen doesn’t sugarcoat it for him: “That will indeed be your fate.” And when Gilraen later announces that she will soon die, does Aragorn hang around for the bitter end? No. He goes away with heavy heart – but he goes away. These characters do not fear death, though they may lament it, nor do they cling desperately to life – their own or another’s – when its season has passed.
I’m not sure where I’m heading with all this, so I’ll just blurt out some thoughts and impressions and hope that some coherent observations appear: It is recorded that Aragorn and Arwen’s marriage lasted for 120 years. I think we may safely assume that their children are all over 100 years old – no spring chickens; doubtless parents and probably even grandparents themselves, with families and lives of their own. The grief of the parting of parents and children is mitigated by the long preparation for it, and by the fact that all involved have had long and (no doubt) full relationships. In terms of sheer time, Arwen has, by any yardstick, fulfilled her obligations as a mother to her children. As an aside, Squatter, I’d argue that Eldarion’s duties and obligations as the new king would probably make it easier rather than more difficult for him to deal with the loss of his parents. In HoME XII, there’s a slightly different line from Aragorn in which he makes a much clearer distinction between sorrow and despair: “In sorrow we must go, for sorrow is appointed to us; and indeed by sorrow we do but say that that which is ended is good. But let us not go in despair.” Does Arwen give in to despair – indeed, die of despair? I don’t think we can say “yes” with certainty. She doesn’t immediately lay down and die. The wording – “...she went out from the city of Minas Tirith and passed away to the land of Lórien, and dwelt there alone under the fading trees until winter came” – suggests to me a season of reflection and of making peace with her fate before death comes. We might question the very idea that Arwen has a choice to linger for decades in Middle-earth. A series of quotes suggest that Aragorn’s and Arwen’s fates are bound in a very literal sense: Quote:
On the other hand, there does seem to be, as I’ve mentioned, at least a bit of a grace period for her to get herself in order. The ability to choose the time and place and circumstances of one’s death rather than lingering on while the infirmities and indignities of old age assail the body is a blessing which many of us may only begin to appreciate as we grow older. To everything there is a season – and Tolkien’s noblest characters know when their season is ended and have the grace to leave when it is. Indeed, every model Arwen has to follow has taken this road: Elrond, her father, Galadriel, her mother-figure, and Aragorn, her husband, all willingly pass from Middle-earth to their respective afterlives, leaving behind loved ones. Why should we begrudge Arwen this same path? Overly long, rough and rambling, but not without grist for the mill... [ September 09, 2003: Message edited by: Mister Underhill ] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |