![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||||||||||||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
NA-EX-30:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
NA-TI-15.3 Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have become a bit troubled by the curse of Mim upon Androg. If Androg survives the battle, then the curse cannot be fulfilled. But it seems that at the time the curse was written about, it was most certainly intended to be fulfilled. I think there is a strong case for taking the statement that Androg survived as contradicting the curse of Mim. We must decide, then, from among the following: 1. Androg's survival does not contradict the curse. 2. The curse is to be excised from the narrative. 3. Androg's survival must be taken as a projected change that cannot be implemented. Old discussion: NA-EX-28.5: If we retain it, I think this placement is good. But it may not be clear in that position that the statement refers to the time they first came upon Mim. Maybe: Quote:
1. The outlaws remained in the Vale of Sirion 2. The outlaws went south to Aelin-uial and then became discontent and returned. I think we must either follow 1, follow 2, or decide that they are not contradictory and follow both. In other words, as I see it, the statement that they went south must be treated as an indivisble unit; I don't think we'd be justified in taking only part of that version. |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||||||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NA-EX-34.5: I think that "... and ... and ..." isn't that good. What about:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
NA-EX-28.5: Your addition is good, even if I do not think it necessary to make it perfectly clear what was meaned. But you seem to have still some doubts about the inclusion? NA-TI-07.5: Posted by Aiwendil: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
NA-EX-34.5: Your suggestions looks good.
Findegil wrote: Quote:
Quote:
NA-TI-07.5: Your first suggestion looks good to me. If this section is settled, I'll move on to the next section as soon as I get a chance - possibly tonight but more likely tomorrow or Friday. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
the Curse on Androg: What a bad argument on my side! That what a bad memory creats! Your suggestions is good, but I think wounded should be used to clear it up ultimatly:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Meadhros and Aiwendil, please let me know when it is okay for you that I start posting diffrences between The Children of Húrin and our version of the Narn. What I post might be bad spoilers to your reading of The Children of Húrin.
Also this is a warning to all: If you did not jet finish The Children of Húrin and are not interested knowing beforehand what is diffrent in that book DO NOT READ further in this thread. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 05-09-2007 at 12:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Kinslayer
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Yes, post away by all means.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |