WWJ IV: Let the insanity ensue

[Eonwe]

Jenny doesn't sit well with me. Her behavior harkens of a new wolf, soon to be innisiated into that brutal fellowship of lupines.

++Jenny

Please note that this vote is not so much on concrete reasoning as a fealing in by gut. As if anyone has any conrete reaonsing at any point in this torturous ordeal, much less on the first day.

[Sleepy Ranger]

Jenny doesn't sit well with me. Her behavior harkens of a new wolf, soon to be innisiated into that brutal fellowship of lupines.

Pardon me but what?

[JennyHallu]

Voting thus far

Votee
JennyHallu (2)
Elu Ancalime (1)
Gandalf_the_White (1)


Voters

Firefoot (Gandalf_the_White)
Sleepy Ranger (JennyHallu)
Valier (Elu Ancalime)
Eonwe (JennyHallu)


Eonwe, I fear your gut misleads you, and suggest a change in diet. Mithalwen has some very good muffins.

EDIT: Cross posted with Sleepy Ranger

[Thinlómien]

No problem, Jenny.

I'm a bit suspicious about Wilwa. She hasn't really said anything, just posted a popping-in post. Of course, she's (probably) living on a different time zone than I, so maybe she'll pop up later. Or maybe she has real life business. Being silent doesn't mean being wolf who doesn't want to attract attention. It might just be being busy with other things than WW.

Firefoot is a difficult case. I say, if she isn't killed by wolves soon, she's a wolf. (Wolves seem to prefer killing the villagers that have something to say or are making themselves important for the village.) And now the wolves won't probably kill her anyway, because it serves them well to have her there under my suspicion. And on the other hand, they might think that a reason to kill her. Oh no, I'm making this meaningless babbling.

Valier's posting style also makes me suspicious. Don't ask why. It's just a gut-feeling.

Sleepy hides well behind his rockstar-role, so he doesn't have to show much of his real thoughts. A good tactic for a wolf? But the long post he made at the bottom of the previous page makes me less suspicious about him. That was no roleplaying; it was commenting comments.

The others don't make me think about anything special, so maybe they are the most dangerous ones; the invisible ones.

[Roa_Aoife]

Well, I'm afraid this will be my last post for the day. So, who to vote for?

Jenny's drawn quite a bit of attention. She's agressive in her accusations, and has hopped around quite a bit, taking one lead, then changing to another. That's very wolvish, but could also signify someone new to this whole game.

I don't trust Sleepy, especially with the way he attacked Jenny for little things so vehemently. However, he's also offered the point of his time contrictions and exams (that's the system trying to keep you down man) so I think it's only fair to let him be for today. Still don't like his arrogance, but I'll worry about that later.

Gandalf, well, this is his typicial behavior. As I understand it, he has limited access.

I'm afraid this is very difficult with so little to go on. I can draw my suspicions, but I can explain them away, too. In a word, I got nothing. So, it seems a semi-random vote is in order.


++Wilwa

Because she promised a more in depth post, and never delivered. Please stay safe tonight, my friends. I have a meeting with the Ents about lobbying for more environmentally friendly farming. Peace!

[Mithalwen]

Well I threw a stone, the target had gone but it caused some interesting ripples... interesting but not particularly helpful.

Firefoot, now I have had time to take into account the time she was posting, I think was really out on her own with not much to react with. She probably was truly just trying to stir up discussion - but in 3 of the 4 games I have played before suspecting the first poster would have been justified so, for me it is worth a look.

At the time I posted last, Jenny was the second most frequent poster. I just put it down to a new comer trying too hard and gave her the benefit of the doubt then. It may well be that still hold true. Does 2 votes count as a bandwagon?
I don't know but I will not add to them now.

So I am not much further save that if I must go for a relatively random vote, I shall probably go for someone who hasn't contributed much... and by that I mean quality not quantity. Some people have only really posted references to their profession - I know there isn't a lot to go on on day one but ..... "frothy" posts give the impression that someone is active without actually helping.

However I would like explained why limiting the vote is better than people following their insticts however duff? If people choose from the 13 (effectively 12 others - suicidal votes are generally unhelpful) then at least all the wolves are in the pot - yes with all the gifted and ordos. If you limit it then you might be choosing from all innocents /gifteds.... or have I misunderstood the situation?

Time ot reread and see if there have been more posts while I pondered.

[Mithalwen]

Lommy, it was Valier who I was thinking of when I referred to the Frothy posting - perhaps that is it? Wilwa I hope will be back but I guess she has been in class. We all have places we have to be at times, I wouldn't necessarily suspect her for that. Let's face it we are all basically probably looking at an excuse to justify a random vote - too keen, too detatched, to frothy, weird job, bad shoes, too experienced, too inexperienced, too loud, too quiet .... take your pick....

[Thinlómien]

I'm probably soon being kicked off the computer so I have to vote.

There's nothing I can really base my suspicions on. In my previous post I pretty much suspect everyone (which actually is the same as not saying anything). My random/gut-feeling/I-don't-like-useless-posts-though-I'm-making-them-all-the-time -vote goes to
++Wilwarin.

Good night.

EDIT: cross-posted with Roa and Mith

[Eonwe]

To clarify:

Jenny is leading by an almost 50% majority in the posting category. Many of her posts consit of making slight alterations to earlier statements/theories, and then continuing on to a new statement/theory. Repeated about seven times. Basically, she doesn't have much to say of worth. (No offense intended, by the way.)

She is reacting to the conversation in a way that I don't like. She amends much of what she says, picking up on what others say, and flowing with other people's ideas about her own ideas.

That's really it. Like I said, of course I don't have any proof (even slightly gelatinous proof, much less hard facts). If you want to question my vote, I want to question yours, because, unless a wolf makes a really big mistake, there just isn't much for science and logics to work with. Nobody is going to be making very informed opions today.

EDIT:

Lommy, I'm glad you realize your reason for voting wilwa is just as applicable to yourself...

[Mithalwen]

Well so that is Wilwa and Jenny even at 2 each with Elu and Gandalf at 1 each. It is the first to reach the total in the event of a tie.. so that means that Jenny is ahead. But we have 9 votes and about half an hour to go.

I guess we have to be grateful that there aren't double lynchings. Lommy and Roa voted similtaneously so no bandwaggon there.

Eonwe and Sleepy seem to be arguing because they voted for the same person presumably to establish that they have come to the same conclusion independently and are not band waggoning.

Is anyone else out there?