![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#9 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BL-EX-03: I am not adamant in using it. In my view it is a passage with further details worth the changes need to use it. But the case that Tolkien did not include it in the revision shades some doubts on it.
It would be good to have third voice in this, but if your doubts presists we can drop it. BL-RG-09: What is then with: "of Manwë Lord of {Gods}[Eä]. Who calls"? BL-RG-11.5: Alternativ: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BL-RG-22: Very good! The question if the "s" in names is possible is beyond my knowldge of english orthography. But I would drop it simply to be on the save said. BL-RG-23: You are rightthe history of the name was Tavros > Tauros > Tauron. I will add that to the list of General changes. BL-RG-24: Okay, I will take the "had" back in. BL-RG-26, BL-RG-27 & BL-EX-03: Agreed. BL-RG-30: I like your suggestion. The use of pursue is a bit out of the maenstream meaning, but for me it works. BL-RG-32 & BL-RG-33: Agreed. BL-RG-34: Your feeling for the meter is much better then mine, so if you think the "and" can stand, I agree that it makes a beter gramatic for the sentence. The issue of Saurons death: I have to research this further. I remember dimly that this defeat was adress some were in a telling way, but as jet I cold not find it. In the moment my feeling is that Sauron was not killed and that therefore I would remove the cdead wolfish corpse. Respectfully Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|