Tol-In-Gauroth XXIV: Battle of the Band[Wagon]

[THE Ka]

Ugh... Okay, well it looks like my RL schedule is getting in the way of this game again, especially today, Tuesdays are my long days, and this most likely will be my last post for awhile. So, I am probably going to have to make a vote in this one. If I am lynched for it, I really don't mind. My RL schedule is just messing this game up horribly, and I am falling behind in analyzing.

Originally Posted by Boro

The Ka (who seems more active today like she's anxious to keep the people who are talking against eachother and come under scrutiny) View this post.

( Again, refer to my lack of free time that has been developing as of late, and my relative's death. I'm just too far behind on the wrong day. )

I guess I can give one last bit of thoughts on my mind.

I'm not going to vote immediately for Lommy, due to I understand and agree her RL, she has said in the admin thread that she would had a limit to net access this week, and I can understand this.

Here is something I've noticed, and I don't know how helpful it is, but it just seems alittle, well, too friendly...

Originally Posted by Boro

There was no anger in my post, or at least none intended. It was defensive though, but that's how I am when I get suspected.

I don't know how to put this completely, but it just seems interesting to note how whenever rune or boro explain something about their voting, they will nit pick at little details (like most people do... it's natural in a ww game), then either one will convince the other, and then it is compliments and reassurances. It just seems a bit, well, fishy. I am going to have to agree with Thinlomien about Boro, but just because someone analyzes quite alot, does not mean they can leave all ends trimmed up. Over-analyzing can seem like a fuzzy warm blanket of safety, or barrier of truth, though in this case, I think quite alot of talk is as suspicious as no activity at all...

Originally Posted by Boro

If I agree with you I'll say I agree with you. If I disagree with you I'll say I disagree with you. I'm straight forward and blunt, there's no hidden messages, nor clues, nor secret evil intentions throughout any of my posts. I say what I mean.

Originally Posted by Boro

Let me give you this poker analogy, you don't want your opponent to know your plan, or how you are playing. Beacuse, if they do you are too easy to predict and the other players and they will make you pay for it. I find Werewolf to be the same, I don't want the wolves knowing my mind, so I won't say what I find to be wolvish. Now, if something does look wolvish to me, I'm going to jump out and say so, but I won't discuss what I'm looking for in order to find wolves.

There are no 'secret messages', because if following the poker method, they never will leave what is concluded in one's head. That I agree. You cannot trust anyone in a game of poker, the same as with ww.

Though, jumping out and saying something without much of a conclusion (over-analyzing can have not much of a conclusion too, as never saying much), is equally suspicious for wolfish behaviour, and is the same behaviour as voting for others who vote at random, as on the first day.

I am finding this plan, though I may agree with certain aspects of it, a bit too suspicious. Especially right now.

I do not have enough free time as others as to entirely write out a long, rambling post on this, but I think I have done as much as I can for now.


As I said before, Tuesday is my long day, so I will not have time to finish anything, and I completely understand voting for me on this fact. I have to leave now, and I better get my vote up, since I do not have any time to later, so...

++Boromir88