Tol-in-Gaurhoth XXVI - Úcenite Valto

[littlemanpoet]

Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man

Of course, anyone other than Elempi may still revoke and re-vote, although a fair few are unlikely to return.

...

Elempi, on the other hand, has done little other than vote twice, with little in the way of solid reasoning in either case. First, on the basis of a grudge, since retracted. And second on the basis of an early declaration of innocence. Problem is, a number of villagers have made bold declarations of innocence (the phantom, Boro and Esty spring to mind). They can’t all be Wolves. And since I consider Diamond’s “declaration” to be part of the early Day 1 “banter”, I find it rather specious reasoning for a vote.

I also rather agree with Eomer that Elempi nicely fit’s the description of “person Fea would be likely to pick as a Wolf”.

And of course there is, as Elempi himself points out, the added factor that I always find him suspicious.

Thou overbite of a shark.

Praytell what reasoning would you have? I am not one to go into loyerly Gobtwiddling for the sake of mere gray matter exercise.

As to "person Fea would likely pick as a Wolf", what player in this game does not fit that description?