Werewolf XXXI: The Unknown Enemies

[Macalaure]

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

We don't know if we have a ranger though, so if we go a night with out a kill, we cannot assume that a person was protected. Roa

So no kill means that the wolves just decided not to kill anybody? Why not come to the sensible conclusion that no kill = ranger? Why is she trying to make us doubt even this? TGWBS

It just occurred to me that we might have a Cursed Villager among us, a villager who, when attacked by the wolves, turns into one of them. This would result in a night without a kill, too.

[Legate of Amon Lanc]

Originally Posted by Macalaure

It just occurred to me that we might have a Cursed Villager among us, a villager who, when attacked by the wolves, turns into one of them. This would result in a night without a kill, too.

But why would then Menel speak about delaying the deadline because of the wolves not sending him the kill?

[Mithalwen]

I doubt he would have actually stated that he had decided not to kill anyone in those circumstances. But that doesn't mean that there isn't a cursed of course....

[Macalaure]

Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc

But why would then Menel speak about delaying the deadline because of the wolves not sending him the kill?

Oh, no, no! You misunderstand me. Or I wasn't clear enough...

I was referring to Mith, who was referring to Roa's and tgwbs's general point about being able to count with a ranger if there's no kill in one night. If there is nothing special, as there was tonight, Roa is right here, because of the possible existance of a Cursed.