Werewolf XXXI: The Unknown Enemies

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by Roa_Aoife

++Nogrod
As if it's any surprise.

Well, in a sense it is. I mean it took you up to Day3 to come up with that action...

Okay. I've read the thread through with some speed. I need to eat now but will be back soon enough.

But I must say that Roa's vote didn't help to lower my suspicion of her at all. Not that she voted for me - as anyone has the right to vote for whomever they wish - but the lack of anything credible behind it. That doesn't sound like an innocent Roa at all. I'll be back with this later.

Also I've been thinking that as we clearly don't seem to have a werebear in this game (there was only one kill last Night and none in the first) it would suggest that we have lovers on board. Menel promised surprises and having a cobbler hardly counts as one. There might even be other ones but it's probably insensible to go on speculating about those too much.

It's looking interesting how f.ex. Macalaure has defended Roa from Day1 on quite insistently - his last post is one of the most curious where he says that he can't find anything suspicious about her - and basically suspects only Lommy - but when he finally lists his last doubts; whether Gil, Legate, Rikae or myself have indeed fooled him marvellously, he doesn't mention the chance that Roa has fooled him (which should always be on one's mind...). I'm just curious about that. I'll come to this later as well.

And a small correction still:

Originally Posted by Roa

Right now, Legate and Nogrod are not looking to good because they insist on dismissing the possibilities. Wolves wanting to hide their true reasoning would do that.

I have nowhere stated that we should not look at what Brinniel has said. I openly said we might gain something from her posting - as from anyone's posting. And here we know she was innocent at least, so even if she didn't knew any more than we do, we can rely on her having good intentions and not trying to mislead us. Surely. But what I think was important to say was that I'm afraid the main reason she was killed lies elsewhere than in the actual substance she said. That I'm afraid is still true *cursed meta-reasons*. We should also remember that the wolves may also sway the interpretation on why someone was killed to serve their purposes. So insisting on reading something out of them is not any less suspicious than remarking their possible non-exacteness at particular situations. Indeed the wolves are much more ready to twist the interpretation of the dead one as they have had time to discuss and think the situation before the Day dawned.