WW XXXIII - Other Minds and Hands

[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by Volo

But what I do want to hear is if you think that the end of the post #357 is against the rules.

No, I don't consider it to be against the rules. Bad form, even for a Wolf or Cobbler, but not against the rules.

In my view, it should stand as the evidence it represents (ie highly damning). Your suggestion that such evidence might be destroyed is simply another indication of your bad intent, as far as I am concerned.

Have you ever heard the saying:

Oh what a complex web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive.

Edit: Crossed with the voice from above et seq

[Volo]

You say that I and Legate are Wolves. Who is the last Wolf then? And no, that isn't a confession.

[Volo]

My turn to be talkative is it?

Well, how do you explain this:

Originally Posted by Rikae

In one trailer, a Downer flipped randomly through a copy of LOTR, then, finding something, sat back and frowned, deep in thought.

[Aganzir]

No use, Volo. They know as well as you who is lying. It's all about time now. They still have a slight chance to win, so of course they want to lynch you.

[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by Volo

You say that I and Legate are Wolves. Who is the last Wolf then?

I cannot be sure that you are a Wolf. You may well be the Cobbler, for all I know. Neither can I be sure of the remaining Wolf or Wolves, although I have some ideas. One step at a time, though. I have two baddies in my sights at the moment, as you well know.

Originally Posted by Volo

Well, how do you explain this:

What, the narrative that you picked up on as part of your ruse? I have no idea. Perhaps it relates to Lommy's role, as we have no clear idea how it worked. Or possibly it is an element of the Cobbler role. Indeed, that would make sense if you are the Cobbler.

[Volo]

Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man

What, the narrative that you picked up on as part of your ruse? I have no idea. Perhaps it relates to Lommy's role, as we have no clear idea how it worked. Or possibly it is an element of the Cobbler role. Indeed, that would make sense if you are the Cobbler.

Originally Posted by Rikae

Two trailers were watched by unseen eyes that night; but for what purpose I cannot say.

Doesn't that sound more like the typical Ranger-text...

And how do you manage to relate this ("In one trailer, a Downer flipped randomly through a copy of LOTR, then, finding something, sat back and frowned, deep in thought.") to a Cobbler?

[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by Volo

And how do you manage to relate this ("In one trailer, a Downer flipped randomly through a copy of LOTR, then, finding something, sat back and frowned, deep in thought.") to a Cobbler?

How the heck should I know? Perhaps you could elaborate, although don't worry - I can wait 'til the afterthread.

One thing I do know, however, is that section of narrative does not get anywhere near to establishing your claim. And with all the evidence in favour of your claim being a false one, I have little doubt now that you are malign.

I don't propose debating with you any further. There's no point, given your alignment.