Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
08-13-2003, 05:10 AM | #1 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
The Bridge Of Khazad-dum
Was the Balrog small enough to cross the bridge? If not then maybe Gandalf could have just run out and left it, thus avoiding death.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
08-13-2003, 05:27 AM | #2 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,036
|
It is a difficult matter to discuss the actual size of a balrog, being a creature of shadow and flame, an evil spirit covered in flames.
They are described as "man-like" except that fire streamed from them, and they were swathed in dark shadow. If you take this litteraly, a balrog would have the size of a man, and he would be able to cross the bridge. But "men-like" could also describe their appearance, and not the size. It could look like a man, but ten times bigger than a man. Hey, maybe he was to big to cross the bridge, but he could fly over it! But that leads us to another discussion... [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img] [img]smilies/evil.gif[/img]
__________________
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.- Confucius. |
08-13-2003, 05:30 AM | #3 |
Hungry Ghoul
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,719
|
The bridge was big enough to let men cross more or less fast and comfortably, and the Balrog was of "man-shape, yet greater", so, yes. The Balrog was already standing on the bridge, too. If it got narrower towards the middle, he might have had to leap.
And though I consider it unlikely, I would not categorily rule out the possibility that he might have been able to fly. |
08-13-2003, 09:29 PM | #4 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sharkey's End
Posts: 267
|
Even if the balrog was twice the size of a man (I think it says this in the fall of Gondolin of balrogs being twice man high) it should have had no problem crossing the bridge. This is shown by the fact that it did in fact go onto the bridge and began to cross, it took Gandalf's breaking the bridge to stop its advance.
__________________
His sword was long his lance was keen His shining helm afar was seen The countless stars of heavens field Were mirrored in his silver shield |
08-14-2003, 02:52 PM | #5 |
Tyrannus Incorporalis
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the North
Posts: 833
|
Balrogs were almost certainly not actually as big as the one in the movie. I think it probably could have pursued them as long as it wished.
In the movie, it did not make sense for Gandalf to stop on the bridge and challenge the Balrog, because it could almost certainly not have gone out the exit they escaped through, which was just big enough for someone of human or orc size to pass.
__________________
...where the instrument of intelligence is added to brute power and evil will, mankind is powerless in its own defence. |
08-14-2003, 04:19 PM | #6 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mirkwood Forest
Posts: 45
|
Considering the balrog was there for quite some time, and it certainly knew the bridge was there, I would doubt that it would have attempted to cross the bridge if it was not able to do so. Also, it may have used this bridge when the dwarves were exterminated .
__________________
By the starlit mere of Cuivienen, they rose from the sleep of Iluvatar |
08-15-2003, 08:32 AM | #7 |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: In The Deep Places Of The World
Posts: 61
|
Foot by foot? [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img] If it did have wings (I'm not saying it does) it was to too small a place to fly back up, and on the Watch Tower Gandalf defeated it. Maybe it did have wings.
__________________
Hail to the Lords of Angmar, for we are the true power! |
08-16-2003, 02:21 PM | #8 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
Lord of Angmar, you are right. Just another movie mistake.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
08-17-2003, 04:19 AM | #9 | |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the Shade of a Tree
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
[img]smilies/confused.gif[/img]
__________________
The English-speaking world is divided into those who have read The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit and those who are going to read them. Sunday Times Crickhollow |
|
08-17-2003, 07:27 AM | #10 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: round here
Posts: 39
|
yeah, I have to agree [img]smilies/tongue.gif[/img] And some parts in the movie are weak, but thats what you get i spose for turning a fantasy book into a movie.
__________________
I am going now . . . if i return before i get back, please ask me to wait. |
08-18-2003, 09:56 AM | #11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, I agree that when you turn a book into a movie, it is invariably very inferior... I don't think people should do this!!! Books are much better than movies. Always. [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]
|
08-18-2003, 12:08 PM | #12 | |
Estelo dagnir, Melo ring
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
Balrogs are fallen Maiar, are they not? I believe they could make it onto or across a bridges without much difficulty. And, yes, the film most likely exaggerated the size of the balrog greatly. Plus, I am sure the dwarves build bridges that are quite efficient in their purpose. What I wonder is...can balrogs burrow? Okay, nevermind, I'm going off on another discussion here. Unless anyone would like to discuss the possibility of balrogs burrowing? Eh? [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img] [ August 18, 2003: Message edited by: Durelin ] |
|
08-18-2003, 07:12 PM | #13 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sharkey's End
Posts: 267
|
I think the reason that Gandalf stayed to fight the balrog rather than running away from it was because he knew that it needed to be killed, and he was the only one who could have defeated at that moment. He didn't want the balrog to overcome its shyness and come out of Moria and start attacking things (especially Lothlorien) so he stayed to defeat it. No-one else in the fellowship could have defeated it, and only a few others in middle earth could have done so (Glorfindel maybe others) but the elves were leaving and may not have cared or been bothered to fight a balrog.
__________________
His sword was long his lance was keen His shining helm afar was seen The countless stars of heavens field Were mirrored in his silver shield |
08-18-2003, 11:27 PM | #14 |
Beholder of the Mists
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in the Northwest... for now
Posts: 1,419
|
Another reason why I think that Gandalf "had" to defeat the Balrog was that I think he had some kind of thought (similar to thinking Gollum had a additional part to play). That told him that the only way that Sauron would be distroyed was if he took on the Balrog, defeated it, and was "reborn".
__________________
Wanted - Wonderfully witty quote that consists of pure brilliance |
08-20-2003, 01:08 AM | #15 |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Touring Minas Tirith with Gimli and Legolas
Posts: 107
|
If it was not to make the story more interesting, I am sure Tolkien would have never allowed the Old Wizard to fall down after being hit by the Balrog's wip. He had already defeated the evil being and should have been able to invoke a spell not to fall down.
My guess is that Tolkien wanted to make him more human, though being so powerful he just lost his balance. If he could defeat or stand up to Ring Wraiths he could certainly stand up to Balrogs.
__________________
I can't believe I have not watched the return of the king yet. |
08-20-2003, 07:02 AM | #16 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
__________________
Nothing is evil in the beginning,even Sauron wasn't |
|
08-21-2003, 04:21 AM | #17 | |
Hauntress of the Havens
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IN it, but not OF it
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
Welcome to the Downs, samrohan! Enjoy being dead! [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img] [ August 21, 2003: Message edited by: Lhunardawen ] |
|
02-01-2004, 03:20 AM | #18 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
i think the balrogs are described to be men of fire
so i guess he could easily cross the bridge of khazad dum if aragorn and boromir could croos it so i think gandalf did the right thing by stopping and destroying the balrog thus ending the menace of the dwarves forever
__________________
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with the bull - The Phantom. |
02-01-2004, 06:21 AM | #19 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: round here
Posts: 39
|
Balrogs are just a tad bigger than men [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
And Balrogs are Maiar, not just men.
__________________
I am going now . . . if i return before i get back, please ask me to wait. |
02-01-2004, 08:19 AM | #20 |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dol Amroth
Posts: 94
|
The Balrog would have to have been at least the width of a Man, because I'm sure I read somewhere that the Bridge was wide enough for Dwarves and Men to cross in single file.
__________________
I go to my fathers. And even in their mighty company I shall not now be ashamed. I felled the black serpent. A grim morn, and a glad day, and a golden sunset! |
02-01-2004, 01:39 PM | #21 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
Perhaps Balrogs are particularly lanky? [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-01-2004, 04:19 PM | #22 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
I don't know, I kind of liked the way they did it in the movie. Again, PJ had to appeal to everyone, and if the Balrog was just a slightly-taller man-sized being, then the audience would be wondering what the heck is there to fear? I seem to recall the description of the Balrog as hulking and huge in the book.
As far as whether or not it could cross the bridge, the book clearly states it had wings. Whether it could fly or not, I don't know. Maybe it's like a penguin or a chicken's wings. Obviously Gandalf would not have stood against it unless there was a need to. ("Needless were none of the deeds of Gandalf") If you mean the weight, the dwarves built their bridges to withstand great weight, I'm sure. Quote:
But it's possible that there was a Greater Power again at work. If Gandalf remained his grey old self, I fear the War of the Ring would have gone much worse. Quote:
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
||
02-01-2004, 05:17 PM | #23 |
Ubiquitous Urulóki
|
Via some references in the Silmarillion, it stands to reason that the Balrog is big, but not huge. How else could they be slain. Ecthelion, in Gondolin, supposedly slew a Balrog (Gothmog, that is) with the pointy tip of his helm. If Balrogs are so big, wouldn't that spike have hit his thigh or ankle? Not a very vital spot. How could a man-size person slay any Balrog with a normal sized weapon if it was two stories tall. I always assumed that the Moria Balrog was roughly three times the size of Gandalf, making him freakishly huge, but not so freakishly huge that a sword couldn't reach his "chest". If he were this big, he could probably cross even a narrow bridge, since even a clumsy man can cross a wide balancing beam if his life depended on it.
__________________
"What mortal feels not awe/Nor trembles at our name, Hearing our fate-appointed power sublime/Fixed by the eternal law. For old our office, and our fame," -Aeschylus, Song of the Furies |
02-01-2004, 09:51 PM | #24 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
That's just as big as the movie Balrog is! The book describes it as drawing to a great height (I read the passage after responding to this post earlier), but it was not so tall that Gandalf could not deliver a blow to his chest in The Two Towers. (I refer to the movie here, chiefly because I really liked it, and want to defend the images expressed therein)
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
02-02-2004, 08:15 AM | #25 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
In the movie, the only way that Gandalf could strike the Balrog in the chest was because he was balancing on him as they were falling. If the two were standing on the ground, movie-Gandalf would have been to the Balrog as a duck is to a man.
ie, very small, too small to get Glamdring anywhere near the Balrog's chest.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-02-2004, 10:09 PM | #26 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Couldn't find the picture, but at the peak of Zirak Zigal, Gandalf thrust Glamdring into the Balrog's chest. This is where I was referring to the height issue.
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
02-02-2004, 10:14 PM | #27 |
Deathless Sun
|
We have the "statistics" for the Balrogs in the First Age, but what if they "shrunk" just as all the other heros shrunk? Think about it. As the Ages went on, all the heroes became comparatively weaker. Elrond wasn't as strong as Fėanor, and Aragorn probably wasn't as strong as Tuor or Turin. What if the same principle could be applied to Balrogs or other creatures of darkness? If they waned in power (and in size) as the ages went on, it would be a lot easier for Gandalf, being a Maia, albeit a "hooded" Maia, to slay or defeat a Balrog in the Third Age, than it was for, say, Glorfindel to defeat that Balrog in the First Age.
__________________
But Melkor also was there, and he came to the house of Fėanor, and there he slew Finwė King of the Noldor before his doors, and spilled the first blood in the Blessed Realm; for Finwė alone had not fled from the horror of the Dark. |
02-03-2004, 09:44 PM | #28 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Good theory. (Short post - mine, that is)
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
02-05-2004, 09:53 AM | #29 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
But were the Ainur really 'of the world' as the Children of Iluvatar were? Perhaps the diminishing of the world had no effect on Balrogs, other than an opportunity for easier prey.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-06-2004, 08:54 PM | #30 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! Last edited by The Saucepan Man; 11-28-2004 at 11:43 AM. |
|
02-06-2004, 09:40 PM | #31 | |
Raffish Rapscallion
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Far from the 'Downs, it seems :-(
Posts: 2,835
|
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2004, 10:19 PM | #32 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
||
02-13-2004, 02:43 AM | #33 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 25
|
in regards to that posted movie pic- yes that 'exit' certainly seems big enough to let exit the balrog.
but if you recall, the little stairway right before the exit (where aragorn lingers to look until orcs start shooting arrows) was not large at all. not even a troll would be able to fit through. |
02-13-2004, 10:58 PM | #34 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
True...
Yes, that's true, but that could just be the "mortal" way for the Fellowship to take...it's all we saw. Perhaps the Balrog flew out another exit!
__________________
Eagerly awaiting the REAL Return of the King - Jesus Christ! Revelation 19:11-16 |
02-13-2004, 11:58 PM | #35 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 25
|
Yeah that's true too, but no matter how you slice it, the roggy in the movie was way too slow. To me it looked like they could've just outrun him.
With all that said, I think it was executed perfectly for film. Wouldn't change a thing! |
11-28-2004, 06:25 AM | #36 |
Haunting Spirit
|
It is said in book that Balrog was just a bit higher than a human,so he could have passed the bridge.In film they made him too big.Echtelion of Gondolin slayed Gothmog,the greatest of all Balrogs.How could he slayed him if ge was that big?So,my opinion is that Gandalf definetly made a good choice.
|
|
|