![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Posted by Emrys:
Quote:
But it is a just critique of our editing and would like to here other about that point. But what do you think of the passage from about Húrin as an admirer of Felagund? Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
![]() |
While I think that in my opinion this first part maybe could stand:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
From Emrys version:
Quote:
Nonetheless I agree that this sentence about the people having no homes or lands of thier own being more ready to join Húrin has some apeal. But in my view it does fit some inhabitants of Brethil much better then the Wooodmen from south of Taeglin. In sofare Aarons version is mor to my liking. What is about such a editing: Quote:
Quote:
Findegil P.S.: Aiwendil, Maedhros, please comment at least at this, since it seems we come to the point were we start editing the text we three once agreed upon. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
![]() |
just a note...
It seems to me that you have omitted this: Quote:
- Emrys - |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Indeed that would from my next §, as it does in our version as you have it.
Why do you think it should come before the meeting with Asgon? Húrin meet Asgon at the crossing of Taeglin, so how could Húrin before that gather any of the wood-men that lived south of Taeglin? Or do you consider that the wood-men all left their former homes at the time of Túrins activity with the Outlaws and that Húrin did not gather them from south of Taeglin but from within Brethil? If that would be the case than "having no homes or lands of their own" would realy fit them very well. Really that is case to be considered: Did all the wood-men left their homes and did Húrin gather them from Brethil? Or did he gather the last remants that still lived south of Taeglin? Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
![]() |
Yes, I think that the point is this one: Who are the Woodmen?
1) people of the folk of haleth living in the forest (without homes or lands...) 2) outlaws living in the forerst: a) north of taeglin b) south of taeglin I think best of the first choice; don't think there should be any more outlaws south of taeglin after the departure of the wolf-men. Don't know for sure what Tolkien intended with that note. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Thinking further on it and re-reading what is said in the Narn I agree that taken in combination it is most probable that Húrin did not gather any woodmen south of Taeglin. Rather he would find followers by woodmean tha had come to Brethil and lingered their 'having no homes or lands of their own'.
If we can agree on that, this is what our version shuold become: Quote:
Quote:
Findegil |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |