Tol-in-Gaurhoth XLIX - At the Source of Darkness

[Nerwen]

A Little Green's last words.

Day 4.

#454. Explains why she hadn't posted earlier. Says the Nog-Dury affair is weird. Says she would rather think about possible wolves, one of whom she is sure is keeping a low profile Says most of the votes on the previous Day could have been evil.

#456. Makes a list:

The villagers.

Shasta - I still don't have a read on him. His theories do seem quite far-fetched but I don't know whether it's to be read as wolvery or cobblery or innocence.
Eönwë - I think he might well be an under-the-radar wolf. Then again, I can't be sure of him since I remember very little of what he has said. I should have a look at him and will if I have the time.
Nerwen - I still categorise her as innocentish because she seems as much.
Kath - The consensus seems to be that she's a cobbler. I think she isn't. I think the cobbler assassin might have checked her the night people expected him/her to take Form. Or am I mixing the days up? I'm really too lazy and tired to check...
Dury - Feels innocent, though not as much as before. She might be a cobbler, but I don't think she is a wolf.
Brinn - Under my reindeer, my first impression is a vague "she usually makes sense". Should have a look on her, though..
Nog - He could be anything. No idea.
Greenie - Me!! (Woo hoo.) I'm no wolf. Nor a cobbler, for that matter. Definitely not.
the phantom - YesterDay I was pretty sure he was just a bored innocent. ToDay I have the feeling that he might well be a wolf...
Lommy - I never suspect her. Never. My gut says once again that she is innocent but maybe I should check her. Gah. Too lazy.

So who, then, could be the wolves? Eönwë and phantom? Or maybe cuddly little Lommy? Brinn? Nog? Shasta? I'm too confused. Don't know...

#463. Says Phantom-Shasta debate is silly. Says Shasta's reasoning is weird, but so is the phantom's.

#461. Says she's too tried to make an analysis.

#470. Says we shouldn't concentrate on Nogrod and Durelin so much. Thinks Brinn's last post (#468, making points against Durelin) sounds a bit wolvish.

#474. Says Nogrod's last post sounded "very wolvish". (#471, where he says he has "a bad feeling" that the people who had already voted against him– Durelin and Kath– were evil.)

#475. Votes Shasta!! Explains the surprise vote as being because Shasta is "under the radar" (????) That's such a strange comment I can't understand how none of us picked it up. (Ah, 20-20 hindsight!)

Comments: tries hard to play down both the phantom-Shasta brawl, and the Nogrod-Durelin one, and looks for an alternative lynching candidate. Clearly, she thought she had allies among the combatants. It looks as if Durelin was her guess for the most likely wolf/cobbler and Shasta the least... although just before voting she thought it was Nogrod... I suppose she looked at the case she'd made against him, realised she might be right, and panicked.

She didn't go after anyone strongly or consistantly, so I think it's unlikely she was killed for being dangerous, or to frame anyone.

EDIT: fixed bolding.