![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,651
![]() ![]() |
So phantom was Feanor obligated to have Melkor taint him? Perhaps he could devalue his possessions enough. I think the Feanor story is all about point of view and we have a different point of view. Why is it the Valar's job to bail him out?
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Beloved Shadow
|
![]() Quote:
Once Melkor decided that ruining Feanor was his top priority, it was going to happen. Melkor is that powerful. If his target of choice would've been Finrod during those years in Valinor, then Finrod would've done something nutty (unless the Valar had stepped in to counter Melkor). Quote:
Why is it their job to try and undo Melkor's evil? Why is it their job to have compassion on a child of Eru and attempt to set them right? You've gotta be kidding. If you want to see how Feanor should've been dealt with, look at Melian and Hurin. She did the right thing and showed compassion and undid Melkor's malice. The Valar on the other hand strengthened Melkor's lies with their harsh banishment. They dropped the ball, plain and simple. Anyway, this is exactly why I didn't want Feanor included in this thing. Hardly anyone thinks about him properly.
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |