WWLXII: Dead Men Do Tell Tales

[Macalaure]

Originally Posted by Lommy

-Snifflin’ Mac Sparrow ~ Cooper
LYNCH HIM!

Originally Posted by Rikae

Mac

KILL KILL KILL

Mac ~ *RAISES EYEBROW*

I have to say that the way the suspicion level against Kath has been carefully and continuously raised just before she came back is rather suspicious. Lommy, Rikae, Sally... unfortunately only one of those is even alive anymore. Talking of which:

Originally Posted by Kath

Mac why do you assume Eomer wasn't a mutineer?

Because he was killed by the mutineers?

Originally Posted by Kath

I said before that the fighting between Boro and Mac was quite likely to mean one of them was a wolf. I don't know which. To be on the opposite side of the fence to Lommy, given that Rikae was suspicious of Mac before she was killed it would seem to put him in a better light. Yet Boro doesn't seem suspicious. I guess by elimination and by the fact that I do believe Mac might be a bold enough wolf to kill Rikae knowing he might go down with her I'd probably vote for him. That said, I am more inclined to vote Gwath because of the modfire.

What you said up there made sense til here. You say you said before that Boro or me are a mutineer - where? I checked, but I must've missed that. Is your only actual reason to think I'm evil that I could be bold enough to? That's a ridiculous reason!
Also, the modfire is, I believe, a reason not to vote Gwath.

[Thinlómien]

Originally Posted by Macalaure

Also, the modfire is, I believe, a reason not to vote Gwath.

Hey, for once we agree. It is indeed ridiculous to vote him if he's to be modfired (I was supposed to comment on that but I forgot). We don't want to waste another chance.

[Macalaure]

I thought I'd better start a new post to reply to Lommy's big post about me. I expected to see some good points that I'd have to concede, plenty of bad points that I'd have to defend myself against. Instead, I would have to array one quote after the other and comment each with "what the heck?".

Seriously, Lommy, you're as far off as one can be.


Oh, darnit, let's try it anyway (all quotes by you-know-who)...

He pleasantly admitted it (that's what person of any role could do) and insisted he had added some points about people's activity.

For the love of... I made a list and you accused me of just agreeing in it. I definitely wasn't, and proved it by telling you that I considered ideas in there that nobody else had considered. Savvy?

And then he retaliated by (carefully friendlily jokingly) accusing me of being generic in return. Not too innocent especially as he was kindly not really suspecting me in return.

I retaliated with friendliness? Oh noes!!

I simply told you that your "points" against me were generic, and thus suspicious, but that your behaviour otherwise continued to make me feel innocent about you.

I accused him of agreeing with people too much and what does he say? "I disagreed with Nogrod on Day1."

That was not all I said, and you know it! Tell me how an innocent can quote this way to make her points?

An innocent would be more on guard about attacks against him because he would be annoyed by their untruthfulness.

But there was no untruthfulness in your attacks so far. There was nothing in your attacks so far. And that was exactly what I criticised.

I don't like his quarrel with Boro. It hardly looks like both of them are innocent.

This is another quite popular statement right now - one that nobody actually bothered to give reasons for. Parrots!

No one can honestly say that's not wolvish. Really, the way he takes it so jokingly and easily and smoothly just sets all my radars beeping.

Inconceivable! I replied jokingly to a joking accusation! String me up, please!


Reading over it again, it is actually a very finely crafted piece of demagogy. Now I have to make up my mind what's up with you. Mutineer, conspirator who's sure about an innocent, or completely misguided ordo. My problem is, I don't think a real mutineer would be so single-minded.

Let's read some more...