![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||||
Wisest of the Noldor
|
!truh niarb s'resreveR ehT sekam nokaH ,daed nehw nevE
I said this earlier:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Just to clear something up: Fea wasn't lynched, she dropped out.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. Last edited by Nerwen; 08-15-2009 at 06:56 AM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Well, I come back after last night's vote to a fine mess, don't I? Lynched the Seer, lost an ordo!Fea, and two other ordos in the Night.
Honestly, those who would look most dubious are Pitchwife voters, but here's something else: Wouldn't a wolf be more likely to inconspicuously slide into a bandwagon, rather than start or finish one so out in the open? I know Tum seems suspicious because she was the deciding vote, but I don't think a wolf would do something that brings so much attention to them. More thoughts, maybe a list, to come. ![]() edit: crossed since Nerwen
__________________
Joined together wrote our names upon the page Seven times alliance our loyalties we gave |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Speak of the devil.
Nessa, you voted me yesterday for personal reasons, did you not? Talk about an easy way out... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Personal reasons? I do not recall saying "Rikae, I'm voting you for personal reasons."
It's nothing against you, just that the way you jumped out at Hakon, when he was only trying to help. You effectively stated that you did not like talking about useless subjects, like how bad Day one is, or the Bear, or surveys, and that worked to take the eyes off you, yet you persisted in actively participating in those same conversations, and steering the talk away from the most important subject-catching a baddie. But no, I don't think you are a baddie, you've suceeded in catching the spotlight and no wolf would do anything to get so much scrutiny.
__________________
Joined together wrote our names upon the page Seven times alliance our loyalties we gave |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I talked about the surveys after the mod's permission, without I would have considered it cheating. I talked about the bear because I found phantom suspicious and wanted to say why. I talked about Fea because I was trying to trap baddies. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Quote:
Now, The Phantom has somehow managed to stick himself both to the top and bottom of my suspicions. His part in finding Pitch innocent can be interpreted in multiple ways, but that is his own fault for not supporting words with actions. I can see him as maybe being a gifted, but that would be a stretch, and gifteds and baddies are often meshed together.
__________________
Joined together wrote our names upon the page Seven times alliance our loyalties we gave |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Dead Serious
|
Okay, I have family wanting the computer and I need to say Lauds before noon. If God should give me a private revelation therein about the baddies, I'll undoubtedly be back soon, but barring that, I'm not sure when I'll be back. Soonish rather than laterish, I imagine, but let's emphasize the "ish" either way.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
All of which said... I'm inclined to agree with you that Rikae is innocent, but your basic premise that a wolf would not have subjected him/herself to the spotlight doesn't fly for me, and I think its possible that we have a wolf or bear among yesterday's loudmouths. Maybe the phantom--he is certainly capable of pulling it off. If he wasn't dead and the seer, it could have been Pitchwife--but, obviously, that's a case of the seer under scrutiny. Hmm... Hakon's the only other spotlight yesterday that I'm really remembering... and he was, I thought and have been proven correct, in the spotlight very clearly despite himself... Okay... Maybe the wolves/bear weren't in the spotlight yesterday... or I can't remember everyone who was... but it's not, conceptually, impossible.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
just to add to the above - a silly move right now, I mean. If it were necessary for the baddies to find a scapegoat, later in the game, probably, baddies going after the cobbler would make sense, but it doesn't really make sense now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |