TIG LXIX: Meeting at the House of Usher - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Roa_Aoife · 11-05-2009, 04:51 PM

Not a huge fan of it, no. I like capitalism.

(Or at least the ideal form of it.)

Ah! McCaber you startled me, jumping in and out so quickly like that. I don't see how Boro could be traceless- he had far too many opinions and suspicions for that. You would have been a no trace kill, as would have Wilwa, or Lari, or Sally, or any of the other submarines.

A no trace kill would have been very easy in this game, and it's practically SOP for wolves on Night 2. But that's not what the wolves did and I think there must be a reason for it.

Feanor of the Peredhil · 11-05-2009, 04:57 PM

Perhaps it's more accurate to say that Boro could have been a no-accurate-trail kill. You can pick a reindeer and have no trail at all ("How can we know who killed her when she only posted once, to say hello!?") or you can pick somebody knowing that there are false trails people will think they've picked up.

It's the difference between no trail and a set-up kill, but on a Night 2 when wolves don't have anything better to do? Like you said, Roa, it's practically SOP for wolves to just pick someone that doesn't mean anything.

Roa_Aoife · 11-05-2009, 05:06 PM

Alright, then, Fea, who do you suspect?

11-05-2009, 04:51 PM	#1
Roa_Aoife Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it. Posts: 1,696	Not a huge fan of it, no. I like capitalism. (Or at least the ideal form of it.) Ah! McCaber you startled me, jumping in and out so quickly like that. I don't see how Boro could be traceless- he had far too many opinions and suspicions for that. You would have been a no trace kill, as would have Wilwa, or Lari, or Sally, or any of the other submarines. A no trace kill would have been very easy in this game, and it's practically SOP for wolves on Night 2. But that's not what the wolves did and I think there must be a reason for it. __________________ We can't all be Roas* when it comes to analysing...* -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen Last edited by Roa_Aoife; 11-05-2009 at 04:52 PM. Reason: out, not so

11-05-2009, 04:57 PM	#2
Feanor of the Peredhil La Belle Dame sans Merci Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: perpetual uncertainty Posts: 5,517	Perhaps it's more accurate to say that Boro could have been a no-accurate-trail kill. You can pick a reindeer and have no trail at all ("How can we know who killed her when she only posted once, to say hello!?") or you can pick somebody knowing that there are false trails people will think they've picked up. It's the difference between no trail and a set-up kill, but on a Night 2 when wolves don't have anything better to do? Like you said, Roa, it's practically SOP for wolves to just pick someone that doesn't mean anything. __________________ peace

11-05-2009, 05:06 PM	#3
Roa_Aoife Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it. Posts: 1,696	Alright, then, Fea, who do you suspect? __________________ We can't all be Roas* when it comes to analysing...* -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen